Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
This is no different.
Why would I want to serve with a bigot like that in charge. he sounds more like an animal than a leader. He needs to have his head examined IMO to find out what his problem is.
This is no different.
I'm not losing anything. The man is a bigot and that is not name calling that is what he is. If you want a bigot running a branch of your military knock yourself out. Who else among the troops does this guy hate? Women, blacks, short people etc. He is a hateful bigot and has no business leading anyone anywhere.
That is only the opinion of a person that will not allow another opinion to be heard withoutg calling them names and you on the left say we are the intolerant ones........what a joke.......
Come on! That's different. That type of bigotry was not okay. The one Navy holds on to is perfectly fine. Now watch him complain about how we are intolerant of his intolerance.
It took a grand total of 1 minute for him to prove my point. :lol:
The truth just hurts doesn't it my left wing friend.........:2wave:
You got it right.......you call me a bigot. I say your intolerant of other peoples opinions........
Its as different as night and day.......You can't compare a race of people with a class of people who are defined by their sexual preference.......
Navy, would you approve of a law that bans black people from the military because of somebody's opinion?
Come on! That's different. That type of bigotry was not okay. The one Navy holds on to is perfectly fine. Now watch him complain about how we are intolerant of his intolerance.
So, you've never served in the military, yet feel you have room to call a man that devoted his life to the service of this country a horse's ass?
How 'bout you go walk a mile in this shoes, then come back and tell us what you think of the situation.
This isn't bigotry.
# the intolerance and prejudice of a bigot
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
# A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigotry
# bigot - a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
# bigot - A person obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious creed, opinion, or practice; a person blindly attached to an opinion ...
Dictionary
The Commandant is supporting soldiers's rights. You don't want to violate a soldier's rights, do you?
Navy, would you approve of a law that bans black people from the military because of somebody's opinion?
That is only the opinion of a person that will not allow another opinion to be heard withoutg calling them names and you on the left say we are the intolerant ones........what a joke.......
Which right is that?
As i said anyone that would support this man is a bigot as well because they hold his views.
Would you want to ban anyone because of someone's opinion?
Such as katigrl's opinion that this guy is a bigot?
Although, he never said anything about not allowing gays in the military.The fact that the's in favor of building the appropriate billets proves he's open to the idea.
But, hey, it's the usual Liberal BS: all, or none. Ya'll can't meet anyone half way.
Yes I do. I am capable of seeing bigotry where it is at. This is what this man is. I would further state that anyone that would support him is a bigot as well.
Serving in the military does not require rocket science and is a low profession that almost any one with an IQ over 50 can get into. My IQ is well over 50 so I have the brains not to do such things. I would rather be actually useful and not killing innocents in the invasion of a sovereign nation. So what would my serving in the military have to do with my ability to see the cream of the crop of the low life that find a career being ordered what to do.
No. Which is basically the point I'm trying to make to your illiterate mindset.
Who the hell is katigrl?
Ridiculous. Separate housing for members of the same sex is an expenditure which would create more people in opposition to it than for it.
This is rich.
The right to live in work in a harassment free environment.
Harassment is not more likely to occur because somebody is gay and sleeping in a bed 6 feet from you.
This is your response and you call me illiterate?
Please stop using your dogmatic labels against me.
I just happen to think that, believing somehow that gays will have a negative impact on straight soldiers because they live in the same barracks. Is as rediculous as the notion that somehow black soldiers would make white soldiers worse soldiers.
It's old, fearful thinking.
If they're gay, and they're there anyway. Wouldn't it be like, secretly feeding your kid broccoli, and then him eating it. And then you telling him it's broccoli. And then all of a sudden he hates it, even though he had nothing to say before.
Well, it just shows that its prejudice and fear.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?