Really? So you think when an email is sent that it only goes through the one email server and that's it? :lol:
Yeah and the parsing is you when you put "personal account" in quotes like that so you can control the narrative of the discussion around your new found phrase there. It isn't about a "personal account". It's about use of a "private server".
Or, he wasn't lying about it and that's why Mueller is pissed off.
Funny how that got leaked...today...right after the news of Mueller yanking the plea deal.
Paragraph 5.
Apparently not.
Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk
Who is "she"
There was a former US attorney on Laura Ingraham's show last night that said it best about this farce: It's not about whether or not Manafort, Stone, or Corsi did anything in the eyes of Mueller, but rather it's that they "lied" to him. And he touched on this supposed report that Mueller is assembling. What the report will basically say is "these 3 guys were lying to me and preventing any real work to be done. I'm so mad because they're lying that they need to go to jail for lying to me." That's what the report will imply because as far as evidence found in the past 2 years for Trump/Russia collusion, there is none. So Mueller can't put down his "report" (which I don't think there will be one if he tries to base it on the real truth). Instead, if there is a "report" from his farce (the sorry excuse that we call an investigation) that would have "evidence" against Trump, he'd simply make it up.
Real collusion with Russia comes from the Clinton campaign which there is real, documented evidence. They hired Russia, along with Christopher Steele, to write up that pee dossier, which was never vetted. It was an opposition research paper to try and smear Trump during the campaign, but yet it was somehow accepted evidence, even though there no evidence to back up it's claims? Then of course there's the matter of the FBI planting a spy in Trump's campaign team. "Well, he was there so he can make sure Trump was protected from the Russians." If that's true, why didn't Hillary's campaign team have an FBI spy to do the same thing for her? For the spy in Trump's camp, that guy would have informed the FBI immediately if Manafort met with Julian Assange, but that spy didn't. Why now is this coming out? In an actual investigation, information like that would come out almost instantly, so let's not fool ourselves on this topic.
Lastly, Obama recently said that he, his campaign, and his administration had no indictments nor any controversies that involved him. Well if that's true, what the hell are these:
-"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." Wasn't true
-"If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." Also not true
-"Premiums will go down under my plan." REALLY not true (I work at a doctor's office and I can confirm this statement wasn't even remotely close to the truth, same with the other 2 things listed above)
-Solyndra failing, and it did with our tax payer money.
-Telling miners and laborers that their jobs were being shipped oversea. Audio and video backs that.
-VA patients dying while waiting to be seen (his practice of socialized medicine).
-Giving Iran, a sponsor for terrorism and continues to call for the destruction of both the US and Israel, billions of dollars for their nuclear arms program.
-Flaming the violent protests and anarchy after the Treyvon Martin, Michael Brown, and the Eric Gardner cases.
-The apology tour to the other nations and apologizing that, somehow, our country is wrong and dishonorable.
-Bashing on Christians
-Bringing the traitor, Bowe Bergdhal, whose fellow soldiers died looking for him when he deserted his unit, back to US soil without a court martial.
There's many others but I want to name the most controversial, IMO, of all the controversies he was involved with:
-Benghazi, and we STILL don't know who ordered the stand down order during that time. My money is on Obama himself issued that order. That is simply too big of situation for any other of his cabinet members to give an order such as that.
Thanks for the story. Wikileaks is the connection between the Trump Campaign and Russia. The "collusion" Trump keeps whining about.
Oh. That’s right.
Your answer will depend on if it’s Hillary or Ivanka.
Wikileaks refuted the report that Manafort met with Assange calling it one of the great embarrassments in journalism history.
he Washington Times found that Paul Manafort’s passport does not show any trips to London in the years he reportedly met with Julian Assange.
The Guardian report is a complete lie. Never trust the Fake News Media!
Their trick is report with really big headlines, kind of like shouting it from the roof tops. Then retract or correct the story with a tiny little whisper that can barely be heard. It's how the fake news media works. And hey why bother trying to get corroborating sources or actual evidence BEFORE we report the story. They know damn well that the first impression is all that counts...
they can print any lie they want and retract it quiety...but what sticks in the average idiot's head? The original lie.
Absolutely astonishing. Add this to the already mountainous stack of evidence. Countless lies. Countless secret encounters. And yet Trump knew nothing about nothing. This is so disgusting it smells of pure sewage.
How could anyone really imagine Trump colluded with Russia to win the election? Trump or anyone on the
Trump team somehow approaching Russia stating we can't win against such a super candidate like Mrs. Clinton and is
there anyway at all that Russia can alter the outcome in our favor, & if you can we will return the favor down the line.
In future decades there will not be another proceeding more laughable than this effort, an indulgence born of genuine stupidity
How could anyone really imagine Trump colluded with Russia to win the election? Trump or anyone on the
Trump team somehow approaching Russia stating we can't win against such a super candidate like Mrs. Clinton and is
there anyway at all that Russia can alter the outcome in our favor, & if you can we will return the favor down the line.
In future decades there will not be another proceeding more laughable than this effort, an indulgence born of genuine stupidity
So you think that google uses less protection on their email server system than Hillary's home brewed server used? Interesting. I guess that is why she felt comfortable referencing three different undercover agents in her emails. S*** like that can get people killed. But in Hillary's words "What difference does it make anyway?"
he
Good lord. Here we go with the semantics games.
Private server. She used a private server. Doesn't mean she owned the server. It means she used a private server. You may continue with your games now to parse it even further.
In this particular case, its accurate. She set up her own server.
Google is a publically traded company so its a public server.Private server. They both still used private servers.
Google is a publically traded company so its a public server.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?