Or, he wasn't lying about it and that's why Mueller is pissed off.
Funny how that got leaked...today...right after the news of Mueller yanking the plea deal.
There was a former US attorney on Laura Ingraham's show last night that said it best about this farce: It's not about whether or not Manafort, Stone, or Corsi did anything in the eyes of Mueller, but rather it's that they "lied" to him. And he touched on this supposed report that Mueller is assembling. What the report will basically say is "these 3 guys were lying to me and preventing any real work to be done. I'm so mad because they're lying that they need to go to jail for lying to me." That's what the report will imply because as far as evidence found in the past 2 years for Trump/Russia collusion, there is none. So Mueller can't put down his "report" (which I don't think there will be one if he tries to base it on the real truth). Instead, if there is a "report" from his farce (the sorry excuse that we call an investigation) that would have "evidence" against Trump, he'd simply make it up.
Real collusion with Russia comes from the Clinton campaign which there is real, documented evidence. They hired Russia, along with Christopher Steele, to write up that pee dossier, which was never vetted. It was an opposition research paper to try and smear Trump during the campaign, but yet it was somehow accepted evidence, even though there no evidence to back up it's claims? Then of course there's the matter of the FBI planting a spy in Trump's campaign team. "Well, he was there so he can make sure Trump was protected from the Russians." If that's true, why didn't Hillary's campaign team have an FBI spy to do the same thing for her? For the spy in Trump's camp, that guy would have informed the FBI immediately if Manafort met with Julian Assange, but that spy didn't. Why now is this coming out? In an actual investigation, information like that would come out almost instantly, so let's not fool ourselves on this topic.
Lastly, Obama recently said that he, his campaign, and his administration had no indictments nor any controversies that involved him. Well if that's true, what the hell are these:
-"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." Wasn't true
-"If you like your plan, you can keep your plan." Also not true
-"Premiums will go down under my plan." REALLY not true (I work at a doctor's office and I can confirm this statement wasn't even remotely close to the truth, same with the other 2 things listed above)
-Solyndra failing, and it did with our tax payer money.
-Telling miners and laborers that their jobs were being shipped oversea. Audio and video backs that.
-VA patients dying while waiting to be seen (his practice of socialized medicine).
-Giving Iran, a sponsor for terrorism and continues to call for the destruction of both the US and Israel, billions of dollars for their nuclear arms program.
-Flaming the violent protests and anarchy after the Treyvon Martin, Michael Brown, and the Eric Gardner cases.
-The apology tour to the other nations and apologizing that, somehow, our country is wrong and dishonorable.
-Bashing on Christians
-Bringing the traitor, Bowe Bergdhal, whose fellow soldiers died looking for him when he deserted his unit, back to US soil without a court martial.
There's many others but I want to name the most controversial, IMO, of all the controversies he was involved with:
-Benghazi, and we STILL don't know who ordered the stand down order during that time. My money is on Obama himself issued that order. That is simply too big of situation for any other of his cabinet members to give an order such as that.