- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 133,543
- Reaction score
- 31,244
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Relaxing and slipping into unconscious is not the same as an OBE or NDE.
Like, not even close
In your opinion...
Relaxing and slipping into unconscious is not the same as an OBE or NDE.
Like, not even close
You will find out someday that its more than just my opinionIn your opinion
You will find out someday that its more than just my opinion
But what evidence is there for those explanations? That was my original question. How does one prove that the NDE experience is simply a fantasia, given that you can't get into the head of the person experiencing it? Somone, Lisa I believe, cited a study in which the experimenters claimed to have collated dozens of reports and had framed an "explanation" from whatever common factors they claimed to find. But their interpretation of those reports is just that, an interpretation. I don't think they were the ones who advanced the strange explanation that involved opossum-style faux deaths. But what's the evolutionary advantage of the opossum-human hallucinating that he's going down a long corridor? How does that fantasia enhance survival in the Classical Darwinist manner? The scientists are also free to ignore anecdotal evidence, but the insistence that NDE subjects are (a) accurate about their fantasias but (b) not accurate about seeing things from some astral-body perspective makes the materialist argument sound strained and dogmatic. And lest anyone ask, I've never had an NDE.No one is saying NDEs doesn't exist. There are rational, physiological explanations for them. It's the claims of the reported metaphysical being actually real that is questionable.
But what evidence is there for those explanations? That was my original question. How does one prove that the NDE experience is simply a fantasia, given that you can't get into the head of the person experiencing it? Somone, Lisa I believe, cited a study in which the experimenters claimed to have collated dozens of reports and had framed an "explanation" from whatever common factors they claimed to find. But their interpretation of those reports is just that, an interpretation. I don't think they were the ones who advanced the strange explanation that involved opossum-style faux deaths. But what's the evolutionary advantage of the opossum-human hallucinating that he's going down a long corridor? How does that fantasia enhance survival in the Classical Darwinist manner? The scientists are also free to ignore anecdotal evidence, but the insistence that NDE subjects are (a) accurate about their fantasias but (b) not accurate about seeing things from some astral-body perspective makes the materialist argument sound strained and dogmatic. And lest anyone ask, I've never had an NDE.
The problem is science hasnt invented instruments sensitive enough to detect the Astral world.Prove it and I will listenj
Then one cannot claim an astral world exists.The problem is science hasnt invented instruments sensitive enough to detect the Astral world.
No one accepted it then either.It would be the same as asking for evidence the. bacterial world exists, before Antoni van Leeuwenhoek invented the microscope in 17th century.
Which is subjective and scientifically invalid.So until that happens I can only give you anecdotal evidence.
Its all about the evidence. Anecdotal "evidence" is the weakest of all.I dont blame people for being skeptical, cause if it hadnt happen to me I wouldnt believe it either
Stalin killed millions in defense of a non-religious belief system. Was his materialism the result of his having thought rationally about life, morality and death?
The problem is science hasnt invented instruments sensitive enough to detect the Astral world.
It would be the same as asking for evidence the bacterial world exists, before Antoni van Leeuwenhoek invented the microscope in 17th century.
So until that happens I can only give you anecdotal evidence.
I dont blame people for being skeptical, cause if it hadnt happen to me I wouldnt believe it either
But what evidence is there for those explanations? That was my original question. How does one prove that the NDE experience is simply a fantasia, given that you can't get into the head of the person experiencing it? Somone, Lisa I believe, cited a study in which the experimenters claimed to have collated dozens of reports and had framed an "explanation" from whatever common factors they claimed to find. But their interpretation of those reports is just that, an interpretation. I don't think they were the ones who advanced the strange explanation that involved opossum-style faux deaths. But what's the evolutionary advantage of the opossum-human hallucinating that he's going down a long corridor? How does that fantasia enhance survival in the Classical Darwinist manner? The scientists are also free to ignore anecdotal evidence, but the insistence that NDE subjects are (a) accurate about their fantasias but (b) not accurate about seeing things from some astral-body perspective makes the materialist argument sound strained and dogmatic. And lest anyone ask, I've never had an NDE.
You're starting to sound like a broken record.Then one cannot claim an astral world exists.
No one accepted it then either.
Which is subjective and scientifically invalid.
Its all about the evidence. Anecdotal "evidence" is the weakest of all
Says the one going on about NDEs and astral worlds.You're starting to sound like a broken record.
Ask yourself the same question. At least I provide the science which explains NDEs. Anecdotes not required or necessary.By now we know you dont believe in it, so why do you insist on being a 1-trick pony??
You're the guy who falsely claimed no studies had ever been done on NDE's, OBE's, and astral projection.Says the one going on about NDEs and astral worlds.
Ask yourself the same question. At least I provide the science which explains NDEs. Anecdotes not required or necessary.
I claimed physiological processes explains NDEs, the science of which i cited. There is nothing which establishes the veracity of any actual "astral worlds" or other things one "experiences" in a NDE. You seem to think the things experienced in a NDE are actually real, is that correct?You're the guy who falsely claimed no studies had ever been done on NDE's, OBE's, and astral projection.
I proved you wrong by posting dozens of studies.
I then asked if you could at least admit you were wrong that studies had been done.
I asked you a simple yes/no answer, and you still couldnt do that.
For that reason you cannot be taken seriously.
Here are all the studies again for those who missed it
The International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS)
The International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS) is a non-profit working to advance global understanding of near-death experiences.iands.org
And here are some of the peer-reviewed research papers:
![]()
Long-term transformational effects of near-death experiences - PubMed
The results support the notion that NDEs lead to a profound spiritual awakening and a reorientation towards life distinct from changes following LTEs without NDEs.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
![]()
AWAreness during REsuscitation - II: A multi-center study of consciousness and awareness in cardiac arrest - PubMed
Consciousness. awareness and cognitive processes may occur during CA. The emergence of normal EEG may reflect a resumption of a network-level of cognitive activity, and a biomarker of consciousness, lucidity and RED (authentic "near-death" experiences).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
![]()
"He should stay in the grave": Cultural Patterns in the Interpretation of Near-Death Experiences in African Traditional Religions
Abstract: A wide-ranging survey of ethnographic, explorer, and missionary literature demonstrates that although historical accounts of near-death experiences (NDEs) are attested in indigenous African societies, they are comparatively rare. Correspondingly, there is also a scarcity of...digital.library.unt.edu
![]()
“The Sun told me I would be restored to life”: Native American Near- Death Experiences, Shamanism, and Religious Revitalization Movements
This article discusses near-death experiences as a central theme of Native American afterlife beliefs, and Native Americans' response to Christian missionaries. It argues that NDEs and socio-political factors can explain Native American religious revitalization movements and beliefs in general.digital.library.unt.edu
![]()
Frontiers | Near-death experiences in non-life-threatening events and coma of different etiologies
Background: Near death experiences (NDEs) are increasingly being reported as a clearly identifiable physiological and psychological reality of clinical signi...www.frontiersin.org
![]()
Terminal Lucidity in a Pediatric Oncology Clinic - PubMed
The sporadic occurrence of unusually enhanced mental clarity before death has been documented over time and cultures, and reported in patients with and without neurodegenerative diseases, psychiatric disorders, and other neurocognitive deficits, as well as those with nonterminal and terminal...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
journals.lww.com
![]()
Empirically-Based Best Estimates of After-Death Communication (ADC) Phenomena: A Systematic Review of Research
Article discussing and ranking 35 studies on after-death communication (ADC) related phenomena.doi.org
DUH!!! Obviously I think they're real.I claimed physiological processes explains NDEs, the science of which i cited. There is nothing which establishes the veracity of any actual "astral worlds" or other things one "experiences" in a NDE. You seem to think the things experienced in a NDE are actually real, is that correct?
What you think is real is not necessarily so. Like a dream or hallucination. Thats what the studies i cited demonstrate.DUH!!! Obviously I think they're real.
After all my posts ITT you still have to ask that question??
Now let me ask you again, and please respond with just a yes or no answer.
After I posted the studies, do you now admit there have been dozens of studies done on NDE's?? Yes or no??
I didnt ask you whether you think the studies I posted are real or not.What you think is real is not necessarily so. Like a dream or hallucination. Thats what the studies i cited demonstrate
I didn't ask about your studies. I asked if think whatever you saw was actually real and not some dream or hallucination?I didnt ask you whether you think the studies I posted are real or not.
Answer the question again, after I posted the studies, do you now admit there have been dozens of studies done on NDE's??
Yes or no??
Still cant answer with a simple yes/no answer.I didn't ask about your studies. I asked if think whatever you saw was actually real and not some dream or hallucination?
Such projection.Still cant answer with a simple yes/no answer.
It shows your lack of honesty.
I'm done with you, I dont have time for trolls.
Life's too short for that
But some people apparently think hallucinations are real things rather than mere hallucinations. Go figure.Brains hallucinate even everyday shit. Like the color "purple" and the visual lacuna between the eyes.
Well, to be fair, much of what occurs in the visual field is hallucinatory. That's my point. Brains are hallucination machines. Some of these visual constructs are quotidian. They are functional solutions to perceptual problems. They are also rigorous, in so much as brains are regularly solving these problem across multiple persons and instances. Everyone who sees purple is "hallucinating" it, for example. The brain is "smudging" blue and red wavelengths the eye cannot process well at the same time.But some people apparently think hallucinations are real things rather than mere hallucinations. Go figure.
NDEs are all about the brain, especially in response to traumatic events and related stimuli leading to death. There was a case a few years ago where a patient was having a brain EEG and he died as it was recording brain activity. The EEG recorded what happens in the brain immediately before and after death, namely brainwaves similar to dreams and memory recall. This would explain the claims of NDEs.Well, to be fair, much of what occurs in the visual field is hallucinatory. That's my point. Brains are hallucination machines. Some of these visual constructs are quotidian. They are functional solutions to perceptual problems. They are also rigorous, in so much as brains are regularly solving these problem across multiple persons and instances. Everyone who sees purple is "hallucinating" it, for example. The brain is "smudging" blue and red wavelengths the eye cannot process well at the same time.
This may or may not be the case with NDEs, which have similar elements (probably related to occipital structures) but also are wildly individual.