You guys must have some online clearinghouse for this rightwing news slop. You people are spamming.
This is another example of why it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an honest and reasonable discussion with leftists. They utterly IGNORE all facts and reality. If the leftist is pro-choice and a violent leftist viciously, and without provocation, attacks a peacefully protesting pro-life person, the leftist will always side with the violent attacker.
Now watch me get dinged by "moderation" for telling the truth.
What are you gibbering about? Check the feed to make sure your news slop hasn't already been spammed.
Racial slurs are generally considered “fighting words” in most jurisdictions.
This joke of a forum demands "civility" from conservatives while you have "asshole" in your avatar. Hilarious.
As I understand it, the judge claimed she couldn't find "intent" in the attacker to do harm.
I've watched those videos. Regardless of what you think of the people who were attacked, that claim is utter BS. It was clearly a deliberate, fairly brutal, assault against elderly people.
Here, for example. Having rushed up and knocked his elderly victim to the ground, the attacker is rearing back to kick them in the face, while his victim tries to curl into the fetal position.
View attachment 67583759
But hey. These people were pro-lifers, so, they got what they had coming to them, ya? Rule of Law Schmool of Law.
This is also really stupid for the Left, even if it lets a violent criminal continue targeting elderly persons he doesn't like. When the Liberals refuses to enforce the law, the Country will eventually elect Fascists to do it, instead. Hope this guy and this judge enjoys their future time in Alligator Alcatraz or torture prisons in El Salvadore. We can just tell them that the agents who sent them there didn't have intent to harm them by do so.
Trial? Why should they get trials? Trials are for innocent people, not bad people (defined as "people I don't like"). Rule of Law Schmool of Law, right?
This joke of a forum demands "civility" from conservatives while you have "asshole" in your avatar. Hilarious.
As I understand it, the judge claimed she couldn't find "intent" in the attacker to do harm.
I've watched those videos. Regardless of what you think of the people who were attacked, that claim is utter BS. It was clearly a deliberate, fairly brutal, assault against elderly people.
Here, for example. Having rushed up and knocked his elderly victim to the ground, the attacker is rearing back to kick them in the face, while his victim tries to curl into the fetal position.
View attachment 67583759
But hey. These people were pro-lifers, so, they got what they had coming to them, ya? Rule of Law Schmool of Law.
This is also really stupid for the Left, even if it lets a violent criminal continue targeting elderly persons he doesn't like. When the Liberals refuses to enforce the law, the Country will eventually elect Fascists to do it, instead. Hope this guy and this judge enjoys their future time in Alligator Alcatraz or torture prisons in El Salvadore. We can just tell them that the agents who sent them there didn't have intent to harm them by do so.
Trial? Why should they get trials? Trials are for innocent people, not bad people (defined as "people I don't like"). Rule of Law Schmool of Law, right?
The victims must be white. You usually love this kind of vigilante violence.
It seems rather ironic and hypocritical the victim complains about his rights while advocating pregnant women lose their rights and autonomy just for being pregnant."What about my rights and my well-being?" one of the victims in the attack, Mark Crosby -- who was 73 years old at the time -- reportedly shouted at Bryant on Thursday as she left the bench.
Maybe they didn't agree there was clear intent to cause serious bodily harm. It was one tackle, one punch, and one kick. then he walked away. There's no excuse for that, but maybe 1st degree assault would've been an overcharge and he gets away scott free.A big part of the problem was the jury declining to convict for first degree assault, presumably based on the injuries not being deemed ‘serious’.
It seems rather ironic and hypocritical the victim complains about his rights while advocating pregnant women lose their rights and autonomy just for being pregnant.
It seems rather ironic and hypocritical the victim complains about his rights while advocating pregnant women lose their rights and autonomy just for being pregnant.
Intelligent people understand abortion is a political issue, not a moral one.
Competing individual rights. The right to life vs the right of self determination.
And “rights” are wholly political.
Funny how often I see people try to make moral arguments over abortion. But abortion is a medical and legal issue. As such, abortion is an issue between a woman and her doctor and no one else's business or concern. Neither is there any rational or real basis to restrict abortion. The problem is politics getting in the middle.Intelligent people understand abortion is a political issue, not a moral one.
Where is the "right to life" enumerated in the Constitution? The unborn do not have rights to begin with, so there is nocompetition. Rights are a legal matter. Political is the problem.Competing individual rights. The right to life vs the right of self determination.
And “rights” are wholly political.
You get the impression that a lot of people on this board can see themselves in the shoes of the guys beat up. Yelling racial slurs at someone and shocked they got whooped.
Where is the "right to life" enumerated in the Constitution?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?