• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lt. Col. Wilkerson: my party is full of racists

tres borrachos said:
Yes. Twice in the last 12 years, and not since 2004. So just how serious a Republican is this guy?
Click to expand...
LOL...you finally admitted he is a Republican....just not a serious one....in your opinion.

Thanks for playing, a parting gift is waiting for you at the door.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Oh my bad, her husband is related to Dick..but the point still stands, I already showed you that Wilkerson contributed to 2 Republicans....you still cannot recognize that or your misunderstanding of English.
Click to expand...

Yes, he donated to 2 whole Republicans - but not for the last 8 years.

So by me showing he's only donated to Democrats in the last 8 years - and a few of them at that - that means I'm right, and he's a Democrat now, at least for the last 8 years. Okay. Glad you agree. So he was referring to the Democrats when he was talking about his party - unless he's having a flashback to 2004?
 
Gimmesometruth said:
LOL...you finally admitted he is a Republican....just not a serious one....in your opinion.

Thanks for playing, a parting gift is waiting for you at the door.
Click to expand...

I asked a question that nobody could answer, because there is none. You admitted he's a Democrat because you claim that donating to a party means you associate with that party.

Big news flash for you - it's not 2004 anymore. He donated to Dems the last 8 years. So by your logic he's a Democrat.

Glad we cleared that up.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
LOL...you finally admitted he is a Republican....just not a serious one....in your opinion.

Thanks for playing, a parting gift is waiting for you at the door.
Click to expand...

So then in the same vein, is Pat Caddell a democrat? Look, followers of Chomsky are not republicans.
 
tres borrachos said:
Which has what to do with the false claims that this guy is a "Republican"?
Click to expand...

Oh dear GAWD party first !

Judging by his donation he seems to be more Republican at 2 to 1 than anything else.
 
winston53660 said:
Oh dear GAWD party first !

Judging by his donation he seems to be more Republican at 2 to 1 than anything else.
Click to expand...

Really? That's some fuzzy math there. He donated $1500 so far in 2012 alone - all to Democrats. Forget the last 8 years - all to Democrats.

So $400 is now 2:1 of $1500 (in a single year alone)?
 
tres borrachos said:
Really? That's some fuzzy math there. He donated $1500 so far in 2012 alone - all to Democrats. Forget the last 8 years - all to Democrats.

So $400 is now 2:1 of $1500 (in a single year alone)?
Click to expand...

Where is his donation record? I know it is in the thread I just can't find it. What I recalled is the he supported to R canidates and one D
 
tres borrachos said:
I asked a question that nobody could answer, because there is none. You admitted he's a Democrat because you claim that donating to a party means you associate with that party.
Click to expand...
Huh....when did I "admit" that.

You based your argument on this false criteria, you argued that he is a Dem because he contributed ONLY to one Dem, further you claimed to not be able to find ANY evidence that he supported Republicans. I showed you 2 Republicans he supported, and you still refuse to acknowledge them....you keep ASKING for examples.

Big news flash for you - it's not 2004 anymore. He donated to Dems the last 8 years. So by your logic he's a Democrat.

Glad we cleared that up.
Click to expand...
You are relying on as much straw as your horse, and you are producing the same results as your horse.

I already explained that I am sure he is never going to support any more neocons, like GW Bush, who he did support. i suppose he will probably still support other retired military officers of his choosing, and you still have no concept of "brothers in arms".
 
So if he donated to Republicans, he's a Republican? But if he donates to Democrats, he isn't a Democrat.

I love Liberal logic. If A=B, and B=C, A still doesn't equal C.
 
winston53660 said:
Well I guess he is supporting Ds now

Who knows maybe if Rs reflect more of his values or what ever he votes for he'll support them in the future like he has in the past. Since it seems he doesn't put party before all else.
Click to expand...

What I've been saying all along. His "party" is either Democratic, or he's referring to the one he supported years ago.

I have no idea what he is. I know he isn't a Republican.
 
tres borrachos said:
So if he donated to Republicans, he's a Republican? But if he donates to Democrats, he isn't a Democrat.

I love Liberal logic. If A=B, and B=C, A still doesn't equal C.
Click to expand...
Uh, he contributed to BOTH GOP and Dem candidates, so your argument goes nowhere based on that criteria.

Got anything else to prove that this decorated Col is lying?
 
tres borrachos said:
What I've been saying all along. His "party" is either Democratic, or he's referring to the one he supported years ago.

I have no idea what he is. I know he isn't a Republican.
Click to expand...
You know little to nothing about the Col, and you still can't bring yourself to repeat his words in any accurate manner, all you can do is twist his words and lie about them.

But then, you are developing that reputation, all by yourself.
 
tres borrachos said:
What I've been saying all along. His "party" is either Democratic, or he's referring to the one he supported years ago.

I have no idea what he is. I know he isn't a Republican.
Click to expand...

It is almost like "Though shall have no political party before the Republican party"

Sheesh the guy has supported both D's and R's in the past. Maybe he will support Rs in the future since he doesn't seem to be constrained by some construct of party before all else.
 
winston53660 said:
It is almost like "Though shall have no political party before the Republican party"

Sheesh the guy has supported both D's and R's in the past. Maybe he will support Rs in the future since he doesn't seem to be constrained by some construct of party before all else.
Click to expand...

Yup, meaning he probably doesn't really have a "party", making his comment about his "party" disingenuous.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Uh, he contributed to BOTH GOP and Dem candidates, so your argument goes nowhere based on that criteria.

Got anything else to prove that this decorated Col is lying?
Click to expand...

So then he isn't a Republican since he contributed to both. He has no "party".

Thanks for admitting that. Looks like this whole thread was a sham.
 
tres borrachos said:
Yup, meaning he probably doesn't really have a "party", making his comment about his "party" disingenuous.
Click to expand...
One doesn't "have" a party, one is registered with a party...and he is registered as a Republican, and made it very clear when speaking to Ed Schultz which party he was speaking about:


 
tres borrachos said:
So then he isn't a Republican since he contributed to both. He has no "party".

Thanks for admitting that. Looks like this whole thread was a sham.
Click to expand...

Or he could think that the people he is supporting for office are more in line with Republican ideals vs. the people than the people on the R ticket.
 
joko104 said:
:2bigcry::rofl:

"WAR HERO" = John McCain. Did you vote for him?
Click to expand...

Did you vote for him given your how-dare-anyone-question-a-war-hero? Or is that just another example of zero integrity in your messages?
 
tres borrachos said:
So then he isn't a Republican since he contributed to both. He has no "party".

Thanks for admitting that. Looks like this whole thread was a sham.
Click to expand...


More, it means that Wilkerson is a sham. And a liar.
 
tres borrachos said:
So then he isn't a Republican since he contributed to both. He has no "party".

Thanks for admitting that. Looks like this whole thread was a sham.
Click to expand...
You are the one trying to negate his party affiliation, which you have failed on, while continuing to ignore that it has no effect upon his words.

Your argument is pointless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom