ocean515
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 36,760
- Reaction score
- 15,468
- Location
- Southern California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
You're refusing to answer questions and it shows how slimey partisans can be.
Let's play Occam's Razor.
Which is more logical.
Trump wanted to gain from the statement of an investigation into a political rival, and in order to do so he dangled official acts, and withheld apportioned aid.
-or-
A conglomerate of global professionals spanning multiple countries over multiple years, with no evidence found whatsoever, engineered a fake scandal by using a drunkard ex-mayor from NYC to be the guy who single handedly brings about their plans, the removal of DJT as president.
Which one is the more logical possibility, and which one has actual evidence to display its potential reality?
What a pathetic effort.
Care to tone down the absurdity in your examples Obscurity? You don want to be taken seriously, don't you?