• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lots Of Impeachment Evidence But One Thing Missing

You're refusing to answer questions and it shows how slimey partisans can be.

Let's play Occam's Razor.

Which is more logical.

Trump wanted to gain from the statement of an investigation into a political rival, and in order to do so he dangled official acts, and withheld apportioned aid.

-or-

A conglomerate of global professionals spanning multiple countries over multiple years, with no evidence found whatsoever, engineered a fake scandal by using a drunkard ex-mayor from NYC to be the guy who single handedly brings about their plans, the removal of DJT as president.

Which one is the more logical possibility, and which one has actual evidence to display its potential reality?

What a pathetic effort.

Care to tone down the absurdity in your examples Obscurity? You don want to be taken seriously, don't you?
 
Oh, I agree with you on Bush, whole heartedly, but somehow, I don't believe you personally felt that way when Bush did it.

As for Trump, can you please expand on how he is an "outsider"?


Ha!


You still don't get why Trumps is popular do you?
 
There are a few other possibilities: Guliani was going Rogue and Trump didn't know. Sondland was going rogue and Trump didn't know.

Hmm... is that why Trump decided not to fire those rogue traitors who caused him so much grief? ;)
 
giving money and weapons to a country with HUGE corruption history should never be easy decision....Trump trusted his gut that Z would do the right thing....clean up his country
Oh, there was no assurance from Zelensky, it was "from the gut" by Trump.

Can you link to that? I did not see that announcement from potus or the WH.
 
nobody but Dems and never trumpers believe any laws have been broken....this is about politics.

Trump understands he gets his shot at Schiff in Senate trial and has come to embrace that opportunity as I

Your popular view make sense in the Alternative Facts driven Trump World. Back in the Real World, Impeachment looms large and imminent due to overwhelming and irrefutable evidence.
 
I asked for a definition, not an example. Furthermore, you sort of defeat your own point above; they don't have to like him, so what do you expect them to do with him?

Further, I'll have your answer to my final inquiry in the original post, please.

Pelosi should stop being so butt hurt and work with Trump ....Hillary lost get over it
 
Pelosi should stop being so butt hurt and work with Trump ....Hillary lost get over it

Trump should quit using rogue diplomacy and abusing the powers of President. Government power is limited, get over it.
 
But you need to answer this in order for that to be a positive comment.

Why did Trump only care that the investigation be announced, not opened?

Further, why on CNN?

let the world know that Z was serious about reform and would be held accountable with public statement
 
Ha!


You still don't get why Trumps is popular do you?

Plenty of people find him refreshing because he has a big mouth and speaks bluntly. Big deal. For me that's not relevant to how one leads the country.
 
Your popular view make sense in the Alternative Facts driven Trump World. Back in the Real World, Impeachment looms large and imminent due to overwhelming and irrefutable evidence.

bring it on!

Whistle blower will be first witness in Senate trial ....Schiff will be second
 
Pelosi should stop being so butt hurt and work with Trump ....Hillary lost get over it

Hillary is irrelevant, don't you see that? If Hillary had won, this would simply be the reverse. The narrative would be the reverse. That is the entire point you and the rest of the right wing media is missing from Hill's testimony.

BTW, Pelosi has had over 400 bills passed by the house. Work with Trump? That's not possible when the Senate won't do anything - even on stuff Trumpm supports, like fixing pharma prices. I suppose you were not aware of that?
 
From AP, not Fox News:

Yet the witness accounts left one prominent hole that offered a lifeline for Trump and his GOP allies. None of the witnesses could personally attest that Trump directly conditioned the release of the $400 million in military aid on a Ukrainian announcement of investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and the Democratic National Committee.

Analysis: Lots of impeachment evidence but one thing missing


I just saw a video of a bank robbery and two people were murdered and they ran out of the building with money funny thing none of the bank robbers mentioned murder or bank robbery during the crime

Using Republican logic they are innocent

I am really sick of Republicans stupidity and you should be too
 
let the world know that Z was serious about reform and would be held accountable with public statement

What evidence do you have to support this notion?
 
bring it on!

Whistle blower will be first witness in Senate trial ....Schiff will be second

Guiliani should be the first witness, Trump second if they were interested in getting to the bottom of the actual problem.

But thanks for showing it's all a partisan show about constructing deflections and excuses.
 
Trump should quit using rogue diplomacy and abusing the powers of President. Government power is limited, get over it.

not limited enough to stop Obama from giving pallets of cash to Mullahs in Iran
 
Pelosi should stop being so butt hurt and work with Trump ....Hillary lost get over it

Pelosi is not inclined to give Trump any legislative wins which he would then tout as promises kept during his 2020 re-election campaign.
 
not limited enough to stop Obama from giving pallets of cash to Mullahs in Iran

Obama did it. Clinton did it. Blah blah blah.

I know that your only rebuttals are excuses, but it's rather pathetic.
 
What evidence do you have to support this notion?
He can't backup his claim that the release of aid was due to the potus's "gut feeling" that Zelensky would work on corruption....so I wouldn't expect much.
 
Hillary is irrelevant, don't you see that? If Hillary had won, this would simply be the reverse. The narrative would be the reverse. That is the entire point you and the rest of the right wing media is missing from Hill's testimony.

BTW, Pelosi has had over 400 bills passed by the house. Work with Trump? That's not possible when the Senate won't do anything - even on stuff Trumpm supports, like fixing pharma prices. I suppose you were not aware of that?

Hillary started this whole RussianUkraineHoax to cover the fact she lost and try and **** on Trumps Presidency
 
Pelosi is not inclined to give Trump any legislative wins which he would then tout as promises kept during his 2020 re-election campaign.

It would be nice, though, if we had a system that encouraged bi-partisan support to pass laws and regulations that benefit the Republic.

 
let the world know that Z was serious about reform and would be held accountable with public statement

OK, but what caused Trump to release the aid without that "favor" getting done (immediately after the WB complaint)?
 
Hillary started this whole RussianUkraineHoax to cover the fact she lost and try and **** on Trumps Presidency

Again, Hillary is irrelevant, and you have no, not one shred, of credible evidence to support this. Do you now deny Russia interfered and tried to put in place narratives that are still playing out today?
 
Obama did it. Clinton did it. Blah blah blah.

I know that your only rebuttals are excuses, but it's rather pathetic.

non response .....limited government only works when R in White House...we get it
 
Again, Hillary is irrelevant, and you have no, not one shred, of credible evidence to support this. Do you now deny Russia interfered and tried to put in place narratives that are still playing out today?

Obama laughed at the thought Russia could influence our elections







UNTIL HILLARY LOST
 
non response .....limited government only works when R in White House...we get it

Actually, as we see here, it obviously isn't working when a Republican in in the White House. As demonstrated by the Party-Before-Country GOP-Partisan's defense of Trump's abuse of power.

Sorry, your victim card doesn't work here.
 
Back
Top Bottom