• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Los Angeles ranks No. 1 in move-outs for second year, PODS data shows

I'm not optimistic Californians will elect the right candidate for our next Governor. Don't think much can be done about affordability, but plenty room for improvement in other areas. Would start by reigning in legislative overkill.

 
Yeah, I wouldn't be a fan of dealing with that traffic on the daily.
A lot of new car designs include the kind of comforts that people need if they are in them (during commutes) a long time.....Thanks LA traffic.
 
Yes, and cost of living is drastically increased by "progressive" policies, and every additional government "service" requires increasing taxes to pay for it.
That's what happens when you have lots and lots and lots of people.
 
If Georgia is an example, the answer is no. We’ve had a huge influx of folks from the northeast moving down here over the last 25 years, they bring their voting habits with them. Hence, Georgia has gone from a solid red state to a swing state that is trending blue.
So there's hope for some backward red states.
 
That's what happens when you have lots and lots and lots of people.

In general, the cost of government "services" per capita tends to go down as population density goes up due to economies of scale.
 
Meanwhile patients die of thirst in NHS hospital wards. Now that's what I called a "great public service".


That was 2012, after years of Conservative Party incompetent mismanagement.
 
So there's hope for some backward red states.
As time goes by, states change their party affiliaitons or go from red to swing to blue and blue to swing to red. Growing up the south was solid blue with the northeast red. California was a red state until 1992, now it’s a blue state. There are several states in the process of changing colors. There has been movement from 2000-2024 for the states from red to blue or blue to red. Below is the movement based on PVI, Partisan Voting Index along with their number of electoral votes for the 2024 presidential election. I only included swing states, no solid red or blue states.

Arizona from an R+6 down to an R+2. Moving blue. 11 electoral votes

Florida from R+1 to a R+3 getting slightly redder. 30 electoral votes

Georgia from a R+10 down to an R+3 Moving blue 16 electoral votes

Michigan from a D+6 to a R+1 Moving Red 15 electoral votes

Minnesota from a D+10 down to a D+1 moving Red 10 electoral votes

Nevada from D+3 to R+1 Moving Red 6 electoral votes

North Carolina from an R+9 down to a R+3 moving blue 16 electoral votes

Ohio From an R+4 up to an R+6 Becoming more red 17 electoral votes

Pennsylvania from D+4 to R+2 moving red 19 electoral votes

Texas from an R+10 down to an R+5 moving blue 40 electoral votes

Wisconsin from a D+10 to a R+2 moving red 10 electoral votes

 
Yes, and cost of living is drastically increased by "progressive" policies
???

Do the gay landlords charge you too much rent?

, and every additional government "service" requires increasing taxes to pay for it.
Unless we use slaves. Wanna be a slave?

Cost of living is associated with income. High income areas have a high cost of living. Using your "theory," that would mean progressive policies will make you rich. Wanna be rich?
 
The entire list is people leaving blue states for red, other than a few areas in Florida. This is going to change political representation in the 2030 census. Dems will lose both house seats and EC votes.
Or the states that Californians are moving to will turn Blue. As Colorado did.
 
Or the states that Californians are moving to will turn Blue. As Colorado did.

Texas, Arizona, and Nevada are the top three states they move to, and they are not turning blue.
 
Texas, Arizona, and Nevada are the top three states they move to, and they are not turning blue.
Arizona and Nevada are "bluer" than they were. Nothing like California, which is why people like those states.

Arizona and Nevada are also libertarian states. Thinking they are bastions of MAGA "conservatism" would be incorrect.

And Las Vegas is more liberal than Reno, yet Reno has a higher cost of living. It would seem "progressive policies" aren't what you claim them to be.
 
???

Do the gay landlords charge you too much rent?

San Francisco is the gayest city in the country, and one of the most progressive.

Since the 1960s, San Francisco and the surrounding Bay Area have enacted strict zoning regulations. Among other restrictions, San Francisco does not allow buildings over 40 feet tall in most of the city, and has passed laws making it easier for neighbors to block developments. Partly as a result of these codes, from 2007 to 2014, Bay Area cities have issued building permits for only half the number of needed houses, based on the area's population growth.

A 2021 study by housing economists Joseph Gyourko and Jacob Krimmel estimated that artificially inflated land prices—referred to as a "zoning tax", or the cost for the "right to build"—brought on by tight residential zoning rules amounted to more than $400,000 per home in San Francisco.

 
Arizona and Nevada are "bluer" than they were. Nothing like California, which is why people like those states.

Ok, so we agree that California is awful.

Arizona and Nevada are also libertarian states.

What's libertarian about them?

Thinking they are bastions of MAGA "conservatism" would be incorrect.

I'm only claiming they are Republican.

And Las Vegas is more liberal than Reno, yet Reno has a higher cost of living. It would seem "progressive policies" aren't what you claim them to be.

That's because not all progressive policies are economic.
 
Actually, it's high-income earners who gain by moving out of high-tax states. California's top bracket is 13.3%. Several states have no income tax, including its neighbor, Nevada. Someone in the bottom bracket pays 1% in CA. They don't stand to gain much by moving.

Cost of living is the main factor.
I was actually thinking of the New York metro area. I know folks that were literally taxed out of their home
 
Ok, so we agree that California is awful.
??? Why would I think California is anything but awful? When have I ever praised California?

What's libertarian about them?
Nevada has no income tax. Alcohol, gambling, cannabis and prostitution is legal 24/7. It's also one of the most diverse states. Do what you want and leave others to do what they want. Spend money. About as libertarian as you can get.

I'm only claiming they are Republican.
Using what metric? AZ and NV are represented by Democratic Senators and several Democratic Representatives. Voter registration is fairly even, last I checked.

They're not Republican. They're independent. Voting for Trump once doesn't make a state Republican.

That's because not all progressive policies are economic.
Nah. Has nothing to do with that.
 
I was actually thinking of the New York metro area. I know folks that were literally taxed out of their home
You're the one who mentioned fixed income. Someone on a fixed income who can't afford property tax has several options.

The point stands. Those with high income, or property, gain the most by moving from high tax states.
 
Last edited:
Cities and states that don't build housing become too expensive and become overrun with homelessness, making the city a worse place to live for everyone.

LA and SF are two of the most overrated cities in America IMO.
 
The point stands. Those with high income, or property, gain the most by moving from high tax states.

Yes, blue states drive out their most productive residents, and then increase taxes on those left to make up for it until you're left with something that looks like Detroit.
 
Back
Top Bottom