- Joined
- Jul 23, 2005
- Messages
- 6,923
- Reaction score
- 1,738
- Location
- Staffs, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Israel and France. The London law literally only applies to the London Underground which the city owns.
So...how about you? What level of censorship do you support? Because just as with the other guy, you DO support censorship at least to some extent.
View attachment 67202846
It's already here. And yes indeed, "Freedom Can Go to Hell" when Islam arrives. You've learned nothing in your however many years on earth.
40% of all of the 3 million Muslims in the UK live in London. I'm sure they're tickled pink by this edict. I wonder what next thing they'll be 'okay' with? Ooh, I know how about "Sharia patrols"?
Man hospitalised by Austria 'Sharia patrol' after he told them to stop threatening family | Daily Mail Online
That'll be fun, won't it?
I've learned to recognise a photoshop when I see it.
Are you denying those signs are carried in demonstations? Now please prove it is photoshoppped.
The onus is on you to prove it wasn't.
In the future, only women wearing Burqas will be allowed on billboards.
London's Muslim Mayor Bans Sexy Women In Advertisements | The Daily Caller
Well, that didn't take long...
Body shaming, Iman? Is that it?
OK
:wink2:
Sure...
Londoners have no one to blame but themselves.
I'll tell you this; I wouldn't support white Brits moving into Pakistan and demanding that they change their culture and start putting scantily clad pictures of women everywhere.
See what I'm saying? When in Rome, do as Romans do, don't threaten to behead Romans for not being exactly like you.
People seem to be blowing this out of proportion. It is just a ban from the city's public transportation system.
It also has absolutely nothing to do with his being a Muslim, but we would not want to let little facts like that get in the way of their hysterical rant...
How do we know that? Because Mullah Khan found a figleaf to justify it?
No, they're not. It's the camel's nose in the tent. It's an issue of freedom of expression, and if a ban can be justified based (supposedly) on image issues then it can be broadened to other flimsy reasons.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?