Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence Of Trump’s Push For National Guard

[Athanasius68]

Yes , 29 is a good post, especially the last sentence. But I'm asking about the meeting before J6. The OP is about that meeting but I'm not sure who understands what happened.

How about you?


Do you know why his mention of NG was not ordered?

Do you know why trump was asking for the NG?

Security, one would imagine

 

[Michael Cole]

Security, one would imagine

If you order a pizza, do you wait three hours before calling and asking, "Where's my pizza?"

 

[Peacenik]

Let us never forget and always remember: It was Republicans who killed the creation of an independent 911-style Commission to investigate the horrific events of January 6th 2021.

There never would have been a Congressional Select Committee headed by Liz Cheney, (who was never a Senator btw, but I'm sure she is thankful for such elevation) if Republicans had allowed an independent investigation. Republicans knew very well what an independent investigation would have been likely to uncover: Donald caused January 6th. McConnell knew it and said so.

Republicans have been backpedaling ever since, trying to play the propaganda game to muddy the understanding of what happened. We who take in valid and well vetted information understand quite clearly what happened on J6. It is only those followers of Donald who have any doubt. Those doubts are well amplified by the Right Wing Propaganda Machine, the Federalist being right at the core of it.

Thank you. Carry on.

 

[Superfly]

For the leftist whiners....... source police weenies

---------------

“The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative," said Chairman Loudermilk. "Mr. Ornato's testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along, President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down.

Chairman Loudermilk Publishes Never-Before Released Anthony Ornato Transcribed Interview

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

You mean this Congressman Loudermilk?

~ snip ~ Loudermilk, who chairs the panel’s Oversight Subcommittee, was investigated by the select committee for allegedly giving a reconnaissance tour on Jan. 5, 2021, to a group of up to 15 people, some of whom took photos of stairwells, security checkpoints and entry points to the Capitol. ~ snip ~

He’s had his own drama, so maybe he better sit down and be quiet, and be thankful that he didn’t get in more trouble than he did. You’d think he would try to keep a low profile, but no. The new GOP doesn’t care about that anymore. They parade their lawlessness out in the open, and dare you to say anything about it.

 

[j brown's body]

So-- there was no insurrection and thus Trump was not part of one.
There was no incitement to riot by Trump. Thus he was not charged for that.
He wasn't charged for 'fake electors' (by Smith).

Smith is arguing is that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud, and knowingly made false claims as to the power of the VP during his counting of electoral votes. Given the banality of this, why shouldn't Trump complain he is the victim of politicized prosecution?

Hmmmm

Trump was 'pouring gasoline on the fire' with Pence tweet, making January 6 'much worse,' former aide Sarah Matthews testifies

Sarah Matthews, a former Trump deputy press secretary, testified that she had seen firsthand how Trump's followers interpreted his words.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[Athanasius68]

If you order a pizza, do you wait three hours before calling and asking, "Where's my pizza?"

If you wish to argue that Trump ought to have been more proactive in deploying security on J6, no objection.
If you wish to argue it was a CRIME for him not to have been, it isn't (and course Smith isn't charging him here).
If you wish to argue his impeachment should have focused on this area (rather than its grandiose claims Congress actually made), probably correct.

But if you wish to argue that his failure was due to some conspiracy about the riot, no.
No facts.

 

[Paradoxical]

Proof of Trump pushing for the National Guard?

Is this what you are looking for?

**Liz Cheney**, a member of the January 6 Committee, **suppressed evidence** that could have exonerated former President Trump regarding the deployment of National Guard troops during the Capitol riot. According to **Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato**, he overheard **White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows** urging **Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser** to request as many National Guard troops as needed to protect the city on January 6¹²³. However, it's important to note that this information is part of a larger context and ongoing investigations.

Additionally, there have been claims that **House Speaker Nancy Pelosi** prevented the National Guard from responding to the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, but this has been rated as **false**⁵.

The events surrounding January 6 remain a topic of intense scrutiny and debate, and further investigation is necessary to fully understand the actions and decisions taken by various individuals involved.

Source: Conversation with Bing, 3/10/2024
(1) Exclusive: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating .... https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4222988/posts?page=1.
(2) Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence of .... https://joemiller.us/2024/03/liz-ch...g-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/.
(3) Liz Cheney & January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating ... - Infowars. https://www.infowars.com/posts/liz-...of-trumps-push-for-national-guard-at-capitol/.
(4) Did Pelosi Prevent National Guard from Responding to Capitol Attack?. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pelosi-national-guard-capitol/.
(5) Trump did not have 10,000 troops ready to deploy on Jan. 6 ... - CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/january-6-trump-did-not-have-10000-national-guard-troops-ready/.

 

[Athanasius68]

Hmmmm

Trump was 'pouring gasoline on the fire' with Pence tweet, making January 6 'much worse,' former aide Sarah Matthews testifies

Sarah Matthews, a former Trump deputy press secretary, testified that she had seen firsthand how Trump's followers interpreted his words.

www.businessinsider.com

Smith had access to the same testimony.
No charges.
And that is because there was no actual attack on Pence. And even if there was, it still might not have been incitement.

 

[j brown's body]

Smith had access to the same testimony.
No charges.
And that is because there was no actual attack on Pence. And even if there was, it still might not have been incitement.

You can say he wasn't charged for it, but he clearly did it.

 

[jnug]

Because the facts do not support an allegation there was an 'insurrection.'




So-- there was no insurrection and thus Trump was not part of one.

That is a stretch. If a person murders somebody and a Prosecutor does not assert that he can make a case, did the person not sill commit murder?

There was no incitement to riot by Trump. Thus he was not charged for that.
He wasn't charged for 'fake electors' (by Smith).

He was charged for the crime Smith asserts he can make before a Jury. Funny how extremist righties deny how the federal system works even when it benefits their boy.

Smith is arguing is that Trump knowingly made false claims of election fraud, and knowingly made false claims as to the power of the VP during his counting of electoral votes. Given the banality of this, why shouldn't Trump complain he is the victim of politicized prosecution?

Trump's actions were efforts to subvert the system to his benefit. Smith has Indicted for crimes he can prove before a jury. Trump should be thankful....but course he won't be.

 

[Michael Cole]

If you wish to argue that Trump ought to have been more proactive in deploying security on J6, no objection.
If you wish to argue it was a CRIME for him not to have been, it isn't (and course Smith isn't charging him here).
If you wish to argue his impeachment should have focused on this area (rather than its grandiose claims Congress actually made), probably correct.

But if you wish to argue that his failure was due to some conspiracy about the riot, no.
No facts.

If you're trying to say you wait three hours before asking, "Where's my pizza," I have a bridge to sell you.

Trump sat on his ass. Case closed.

 

[j brown's body]

Is this what you are looking for?

**Liz Cheney**, a member of the January 6 Committee, **suppressed evidence** that could have exonerated former President Trump regarding the deployment of National Guard troops during the Capitol riot. According to **Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato**, he overheard **White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows** urging **Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser** to request as many National Guard troops as needed to protect the city on January 6¹²³. However, it's important to note that this information is part of a larger context and ongoing investigations.

Additionally, there have been claims that **House Speaker Nancy Pelosi** prevented the National Guard from responding to the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, but this has been rated as **false**⁵.

The events surrounding January 6 remain a topic of intense scrutiny and debate, and further investigation is necessary to fully understand the actions and decisions taken by various individuals involved.

Source: Conversation with Bing, 3/10/2024
(1) Exclusive: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating .... https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4222988/posts?page=1.
(2) Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence of .... https://joemiller.us/2024/03/liz-ch...g-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/.
(3) Liz Cheney & January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating ... - Infowars. https://www.infowars.com/posts/liz-...of-trumps-push-for-national-guard-at-capitol/.
(4) Did Pelosi Prevent National Guard from Responding to Capitol Attack?. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pelosi-national-guard-capitol/.
(5) Trump did not have 10,000 troops ready to deploy on Jan. 6 ... - CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/january-6-trump-did-not-have-10000-national-guard-troops-ready/.

Where, specifically, is the proof?

 

[soap box]

Security, one would imagine

Security for who from what perceived threat?

Did you find it curious that trump mentioned NG before J6, but refused to call for them during the riot? You have any idea why?

 

[DCCougar]

thefederalist.com

I assume this story is complete bullshit coming from an extreme right wing questionable source... which is a typical post coming from disinformation-master vysky.

The Federalist: A questionable source that exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence​

 

[DCCougar]

Mr. Trump is not being charged with causing the riot, or anything to do with the riot.

Guess again.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Fiz Cheney, the disgraced former Republican Senator, withheld information during her 1/6 Kangaroo Court type fAiL

The machine is doing its best to avoid having to do what the left is starting to make noise about.

Even with the myth called global warming, there are still grassy knolls in their wet dreams.

We are even seeing some (used to be) here at DP with sick fantasies of the unthinkable.

And day now.......... any day now..... they'll get Trump.

But they have to hide the truth to get any traction

========================

Exclusive: Jan. 6 Committee Hid Trump-Exonerating Evidence

Cheney and her Jan. 6 committee falsely claimed they had 'no evidence' the Trump White House had asked for 10,000 National Guard troops.

thefederalist.com

This is a lie.

 

[watsup]

Say it ain't so?....they were suppressing testimony/speech to form a false narrative? Seems as more time passes, bits of truth keep coming out and the real/true culprits are being seen. Corruption runs deep, no doubt.

Who are the real and true culprits in the Jan 6 riot that attempted to keep Congress from doing their duty as regards the Electoral College? If they had been unable to confirm the EC votes, does that mean that Trump could have remained as president?

 

[watsup]

No, I mean someone here suggests he was supposed to know that a few people would break into the Capitol building. Is that what The Libs of DP think?

“A few people”? Do you have a TV? What was the goal of the “few people” I doing so?

 

[Paradoxical]

Where, specifically, is the proof?

In the post. What do you want? A confession? You asked, and I delivered.

 

[Paradoxical]

“A few people”? Do you have a TV? What was the goal of the “few people” I doing so?

Once again, folks. How many does it take to break a window?

 

[Tangmo]

Glad the concession that lack of security during the riot was not due to Trump.

Unhappy to know it was due to politicized military brass.

The absence of the armed forces was the astute work of the civilian Acting SecDef Miller. He ignored Trump's verbal meandering about 10,000 troops to the capital city on J6.

It was the absence of the armed forces that Trump had wanted to Trumpize into his insurrection that failed due to the savvy civilian SecDef Miller. The military takes its orders from the SecDef or the Potus/CinC only and exclusively. In this instance Gen. Milley took his orders from the Acting SecDef Miller who advised Milley to sit tight, that he Miller had it covered.

Indeed, Miller is your classic American Quiet Man in the crisis and chaos of J6. Miller averted Trump trying to Trumpize the military on that day that would have failed anyway but would have been damaging to US civil-military relations nonetheless. Civil-military relations you don't know beans about. It was an insurrection conceived, pursued, instigated and executed by PutinTrumpRowers who also abound hereabouts. It was the civilian Acting SecDef with a military background who navigated the US through the chaos and violence of the MAGA traitors who give aid and comfort to Putin.

 

[j brown's body]

In the post. What do you want? A confession? You asked, and I delivered.

Are you saying that testimony that Trump's chief of staff pushed the mayor for a Guard presence at the capitol on 1/6 is proof, but testimony that he knew his demonstrators were armed is not proof?

 

[Corpsie]

I hope that when the people on that committee fall, they fall hard.

It still shocks me the lengths some people will go to hurt someone. It's hard to believe really. I hope they all pay dearly for what they have done to those folks. They have destroyed them, and their families, just because they could.

 

[Paradoxical]

Are you saying that testimony that Trump's chief of staff pushed the mayor for a Guard presence at the capitol on 1/6 is proof, but testimony that he knew his demonstrators were armed is not proof?

Yep.

 

[Lord Tammerlain]

T

Trump is supposed to be psychic now?

Heck the predictions of violence that day by Trump supporters was huge, I recall a good 6 or 7 Trump supporters just on DP predicting a lot of violence that day that would keep Trump in power


I expect very few predicted the capital would be stormed.

Allowing the capital building to be stormed was genius on the government. It made the Trump supporters look dangerous and limited support to Trump