• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Live coverage of Kavanaugh Hearing with new witnesses

yep and he has signed statments by people that he went to college with at yale that say the opposite.
they have submitted those to the committee.

no one can corroberate her story she doesn't even know if he was at the party.

The entire New Yorker report is filled with no one can corrobroate whether he was there or not type of stuff.
Multiple papers including the TIme slam the New Yorker for it's lack of due dillegence in what they reported.

Even the Times could not corroborate what she said as true.
so there you have it have a nice day.

that is what we call evidence. you should learn what that is.

it is pretty disgusing that you guys believe accusers but you don't believe the people that defend him.
So what makes their testimony any less credible other than partisanship liberal hacks just not wanting to believe it?

You didn't even bother to address what I said. Just quoted me and spammed your nonsense like a pre-programmed bot would.

One would think conflicting testimonies would need investigating under penalty of perjury but not in trumpland.
 
Unbelievable... Blumenthal, Harris and Booker, who will forever be known as the three :stooges stormed out of the senate chamber because it's "soooo unfair" that they have to vote.

Such high drama. :roll:

the whining from the hateful twit from California and the hysterics of the intellectual lightweight from Hawaii is hilarious. Now the hateful twit from the fruitcake district of the country is upset that Judge Kavanaugh called those gaping assholes out for what they are-gaping assholes
 
Unbelievable... Blumenthal, Harris and Booker, who will forever be known as the three :stooges stormed out of the senate chamber because it's "soooo unfair" that they have to vote.

Such high drama. :roll:

Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms | Fox News

all 3 of them are a POS. booker the self acknowledge sexual assaulter shouldn't even be in the senate according to his own high an mighty attitude.
harris's look when he said i have tons of women that support me from high school, college and my clerking days.

her smile just went to the floor she knew it was true but too much of a hack to say it outloud.
 
the whining from the hateful twit from California and the hysterics of the intellectual lightweight from Hawaii is hilarious. Now the hateful twit from the fruitcake district of the country is upset that Judge Kavanaugh called those gaping assholes out for what they are-gaping assholes

Delay, delay, delay!
In her next life, she should try acting as a career.
 
One would think conflicting testimonies would need investigating under penalty of perjury but not in trumpland.

You stop Kavanaugh crowd members never can tell us this

once someone states-under penalty of perjury, they have no recollection and have no memory or information of attending a party that the accuser hasn't even a clue WHAT YEAR it happened, what is there left to investigate? Why don't you all tell me what the FBI is supposed to investigate?
Where were you BETWEEN May 1981 and the time Kavanaugh started at Yale?

What did you do every night during that time period?

Knock on every door within a 20 mile square area near that country club asking people who may have been teens during that 2 year period if they had a gathering of a few kids

so tell me-since I know a bit about FBI investigations, tell me what they will investigate


Its funny watching a complete scum sucking POS like Blumenthal whining about truthfulness. He's the asshole who lied and claimed he was some sort of Vietnam Combat vet-he's part of the same military effort that had Hillary dodging sniper fire
 
One would think conflicting testimonies would need investigating under penalty of perjury but not in trumpland.
It's not a trial, it's a job interview... remember?
 
Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms | Fox News

all 3 of them are a POS. booker the self acknowledge sexual assaulter shouldn't even be in the senate according to his own high an mighty attitude.
harris's look when he said i have tons of women that support me from high school, college and my clerking days.

her smile just went to the floor she knew it was true but too much of a hack to say it outloud.

I don't know how the Democrats can look in the mirror. Such cowards.
 
which is why you should never be on a jury.
we do not judge people by that
we judge people by evidence not that you care about evidence you haven't cared about it yet.

his temper was justified.

she didn't directly answer questions either.

hence all the i don't knows and i can't remember.

I will remind you once again, that this was not a trial, it was a hearing and demeanor and conduct is most certainly a factor during a hearing. Even in a formal trial, although the non-verbal communications of a witness cannot be sited as a reason to either convict or acquit, it most certainly makes an impression on a juror and ultimately it's taken into consideration in their decision. Even the most subtle non-verbal cues, jurors try to discover a hidden narrative that exists the behind the verbal testimony of witnesses and other evidence presented in the case.

Non-verbal communication such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, and posture --all convey information to an observant juror. Different jurors may interpret a defendant’s tendency to fidget or look uncomfortable is often an indication of anxiety or boredom.The trial process boils down to formally introduced evidence and argument mixed with a variety of non-verbal communication, which may at times yield unpredictable results.

We saw profound anger, and even though he may view it as justified, is inherently disqualifying for someone who's going to have a lifetime appointment.
 
Karma's a bitch.
What they've attempted to do will come back on them...

quota chick is having a meltdown. she's whining about raw power-WTF was she when obamacare got rammed down our throats or when the assholes denied Estrada a hearing when a majority of the senate was going to vote to confirm him. Her hysterics are an attempt to start her 2020 campaign.

its fun watching intellectual lightweights like bar flunker Harris, the hysterical howler from Hawaii and the Stolen Valor scumsucker having a hissy fit.
 
The three stooges :stooges, Kamala Harris, Blumenthal, and the shut up bitch from HI are now having melt downs outside the chamber in front of the camera.
They don't think it's fair that the Republicans have the "power" by majority. Waaaaaaaaaaaa

Someone get the clowncar a tissue.
 
I will remind you once again, that this was not a trial, it was a hearing and demeanor and conduct is most certainly a factor during a hearing. Even in a formal trial, although the non-verbal communications of a witness cannot be sited as a reason to either convict or acquit, it most certainly makes an impression on a juror and ultimately it's taken into consideration in their decision. Even the most subtle non-verbal cues, jurors try to discover a hidden narrative that exists the behind the verbal testimony of witnesses and other evidence presented in the case.

Non-verbal communication such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, and posture --all convey information to an observant juror. Different jurors may interpret a defendant’s tendency to fidget or look uncomfortable is often an indication of anxiety or boredom.The trial process boils down to formally introduced evidence and argument mixed with a variety of non-verbal communication, which may at times yield unpredictable results.

We saw profound anger, and even though he may view it as justified, is inherently disqualifying for someone who's going to have a lifetime appointment.


what objective evidence existed to support Ford's claim-a claim she couldn't narrow to a date, let alone a year
 
The three stooges :stooges, Kamala Harris, Blumenthal, and the shut up bitch from HI are now having melt downs outside the chamber in front of the camera.
They don't think it's fair that the Republicans have the "power" by majority. Waaaaaaaaaaaa

Someone get the clowncar a tissue.

three of the intellectual midgets in the senate. IT must be tough for a guy who was top of his class at Yale Law being judged by someone who has her job because she is an walking ethnic quota convenience store and who flunked the bar or Mr. Stolen Valor
 
it's all relative.

Ford clearly felt she had barely escaped death and rape.

Kavy boy clearly felt the party was a hoot.

It's amazing how we all live in our little worlds.

you're lying again, he never stated he was at that party

come to think of it-no one else did except the pawn
 
quota chick is having a meltdown. she's whining about raw power-WTF was she when obamacare got rammed down our throats or when the assholes denied Estrada a hearing when a majority of the senate was going to vote to confirm him. Her hysterics are an attempt to start her 2020 campaign.

its fun watching intellectual lightweights like bar flunker Harris, the hysterical howler from Hawaii and the Stolen Valor scumsucker having a hissy fit.

Rules for thee but not for me is the hallmark of the hypocritical Democratic Party.
#Draintheswamp Vote these clowns out for the good of the country.

They know the Republicans have enough votes and that is why they are "performing" for the cameras.
 
What are you giving to dems? Is picking a candidate that deserves to be on the bench and is impartial that damn hard to find

no one wants IMPARTIAL justices-I want ones who actually follow the constitution. The dems want judges who think the constitution is a roadblock to more socialism or more government power
 
I will remind you once again, that this was not a trial, it was a hearing and demeanor and conduct is most certainly a factor during a hearing. Even in a formal trial, although the non-verbal communications of a witness cannot be sited as a reason to either convict or acquit, it most certainly makes an impression on a juror and ultimately it's taken into consideration in their decision. Even the most subtle non-verbal cues, jurors try to discover a hidden narrative that exists the behind the verbal testimony of witnesses and other evidence presented in the case.

Non-verbal communication such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, and posture --all convey information to an observant juror. Different jurors may interpret a defendant’s tendency to fidget or look uncomfortable is often an indication of anxiety or boredom.The trial process boils down to formally introduced evidence and argument mixed with a variety of non-verbal communication, which may at times yield unpredictable results.

We saw profound anger, and even though he may view it as justified, is inherently disqualifying for someone who's going to have a lifetime appointment.

If it is your standard that someone can come forward 36 years later, make charges without any claims filed at the time or any evidence to support the claim and this person is believable this country is truly in dire strakes. Wonder how you would react to charges made against you 36 years later and specifically after holding a Federal Judge Job for years after going though the initial hearings and then getting a promotion going through hearings again yet no glove laid on you?

Try and be honest for a change and get off the political bs bandwagon. This issue would never get into the courtroom but because you want to believe it without evidence that is all that matters
 
Oh you mean Elena Kagan in his raving lunatic rant? No, I didn't listen to it. I have no stomach for contrived theatrics. So, now I know.

you best not watch the mental midgets now if you have no stomach for contrived theatrics. Harris is leading for an Oscar in Llama drama but Stolen Valor star Blumenthal is making a strong Push. The howling hysterical man hater from Hawaii seems to have run out of steam
 
I will remind you once again, that this was not a trial, it was a hearing and demeanor and conduct is most certainly a factor during a hearing. Even in a formal trial, although the non-verbal communications of a witness cannot be sited as a reason to either convict or acquit, it most certainly makes an impression on a juror and ultimately it's taken into consideration in their decision. Even the most subtle non-verbal cues, jurors try to discover a hidden narrative that exists the behind the verbal testimony of witnesses and other evidence presented in the case.

Non-verbal communication such as eye contact, facial expressions, gestures, and posture --all convey information to an observant juror. Different jurors may interpret a defendant’s tendency to fidget or look uncomfortable is often an indication of anxiety or boredom.The trial process boils down to formally introduced evidence and argument mixed with a variety of non-verbal communication, which may at times yield unpredictable results.

We saw profound anger, and even though he may view it as justified, is inherently disqualifying for someone who's going to have a lifetime appointment.

Yes and that anger was 100% justified at the level of ubsurdity that was being leveled at him.

are you telling me that you would not be pissed off to hell if someone accused you of gang rape and sexual assault?
seriously you are going to sit there and tell me you would not be outraged and upset?

hmmm if you say you wouldn't be you are lying.
 
no he didn't lie under oath.
no she didn't are you just making stuff up.

as was testified she was calling her own friends from yale telling them she wasn't even sure that
he was there.

she doesn't even believe her own story she doesn't know what happened or didn't happen.

he never testified that he passed out you are now lying.

How do you play the "drinking game" Devil's Triangle?

I'm pretty sure the only way that's a drinking game is if the game is to get a girl drunk and then share her with your friends.
 
you best not watch the mental midgets now if you have no stomach for contrived theatrics. Harris is leading for an Oscar in Llama drama but Stolen Valor star Blumenthal is making a strong Push. The howling hysterical man hater from Hawaii seems to have run out of steam

Your response is nothing other than deflection and 'whataboutism'
 
How do you play the "drinking game" Devil's Triangle?

I'm pretty sure the only way that's a drinking game is if the game is to get a girl drunk and then share her with your friends.

yet no one can prove it happened and there is plenty of evidence that says it didn't.
He doesn't even know who this women is.

There is plenty of evidence that she was paid off big time.
Her ex issued a warrant against her for threatening him and says she is not credible.

she is connected to katz's firm through another sexual harassment suite she brought.

we have the prosecutor has said based on what she heard she wouldn't get a warrant nor charge the judge.
evidence over uncorroborated stories.
 
Your response is nothing other than deflection and 'whataboutism'

your studious ignoring the factual infirmity of Ford's story is telling.

remind me what other factual support she had?
 
yet no one can prove it happened and there is plenty of evidence that says it didn't.
He doesn't even know who this women is.

There is plenty of evidence that she was paid off big time.
Her ex issued a warrant against her for threatening him and says she is not credible.

she is connected to katz's firm through another sexual harassment suite she brought.

we have the prosecutor has said based on what she heard she wouldn't get a warrant nor charge the judge.
evidence over uncorroborated stories.

Answer the question. WHAT KIND OF DRINKING GAME IS DEVILS TRIANGLE? How do you play?
 
Back
Top Bottom