Lisa Page's interview

[trouble13]

Yes or no

Page and/or Strozk leaked about the Trump investigation before the election? Since they were hell bent and had “insurance” not to let it happen.

I could not tell you who leaked what. They may of been involved in the leaks. Why does it matter?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[JasperL]

No, its a valid counter argument to your position. Your claiming that two comparitively similiar acts are different based on the size of the audience or at least that was your argument until i pointed out that the media made both audience sizes sbout the same. Now your changing your argument and centering it on her intentions.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Believe what you want. IMO, these are fundamentally different in every meaningful way:

1) Texts between two people intended to be private
2) President screaming an orgasm using your name at a rally televised perhaps worldwide to an audience of at least 10s of millions, and texting about you like a creepy stalker on your Twitter account with 10s of millions of followers worldwide.

 

[JasperL]

You know the acts. They've been presented over and over. Obviously you chose to ignore them completely.

The greatest adulterer of all time?

You have no credibility.

No, I've asked several people - what acts did Lisa Page do that were illegal or improper? - and I get crickets, like you just did. Weird.

 

[trouble13]

Believe what you want. IMO, these are fundamentally different in every meaningful way:

1) Texts between two people intended to be private
2) President screaming an orgasm using your name at a rally televised perhaps worldwide to an audience of at least 10s of millions, and texting about you like a creepy stalker on your Twitter account with 10s of millions of followers worldwide.

Right, your argument is centered around the size of the audience because you seem to think that it matters. I maintain it does not matter nor is it valid because Trump did not respond to her until after her actions became public. Most if not everyone Trump reached were slready aware of the things Page said and done. Trump can respond any way he deems appropiate provided he stays within the boundries of the law. Page is free to throw herself a pity party as well. She just wont be receiving any from me.

Heres a good question for you;
Once her private texts became public and her open disdain for Trump became infamous, do you think she should of made a public appplogy to him? Maybe of she had, Trump might not of been as harsh toward her as he has been.

The lesson to be learned here is dont pick fights with people bigger than you if you cant take a punch.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[US&THEM]

I could not tell you who leaked what. They may of been involved in the leaks. Why does it matter?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Ok then please tell me why Page and Strozk are villains because of their personal text between on another?

 

[trouble13]

No, I've asked several people - what acts did Lisa Page do that were illegal or improper? - and I get crickets, like you just did. Weird.

Ask Mueller that question. Why did he remove her from the investigation, if everything she was doing was legal and proper?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[trouble13]

Ok then please tell me why Page and Strozk are villains because of their personal text between on another?

They were full of hate directed at Trump. Why shouldn't he respond?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[eohrnberger]

Page's interview is simply to get ahead of the IG's report and spin the story into her favor before it's released.

This happens all the time when a significant story it about to break, such as the IG's report. All those who've committed malfeasance leak ahead and spin it.
Funny that people keep getting fooled by this, taking these leak driven interviews as facts (they are not), given how often it happens.

I'll wait for what the IG's report states, and trust that to be far closer to the facts than anything she has to say about it.

 

[ocean515]

No, I've asked several people - what acts did Lisa Page do that were illegal or improper? - and I get crickets, like you just did. Weird.

When you ask a stupid question, what do you expect?

 

[Airyaman]

Only the deviant and malicious make such statements.

Or Epstein worshipers...

They're usually all one in the same anyway.

I suppose at one time you expected people to take you seriously on Debate Politics. It appears that time has passed.

 

[OscarLevant]

Like Creepy Joe accusing Trump of quid pro quo?

Incompetent rebuttal

 

[OscarLevant]

So you mix in your opinions with facts, declare yourself the victor, and attempt to end any further conversation, lol.

You calling Trumps comments unjust is not a fact, its your opinion. How about her opinions about Trump, do you view them as unjust too... of course you don't, you agree with her. That makes her bias acceptable in your eyes.

Trump has every right to defend himself against smears (your word) being directed at him.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Everyone has that right, but when a despicable human being's argument is that he's being defamed, I doubt any jury would buy it.

And if you want evidence of "despicable", unfortunately, there is a 5000 character limit.

On occasions when I have stayed within that limit, what has been the response on the right?

Usually 1. TDS. 2. "You lost the election, quit whining".


Both of which are incompetent rebuttals.


Unflattering criticism backed by evidence is not a "smear", and that argument will not win a defamation suit.

 

[JasperL]

Right, your argument is centered around the size of the audience because you seem to think that it matters. I maintain it does not matter nor is it valid because Trump did not respond to her until after her actions became public. Most if not everyone Trump reached were slready aware of the things Page said and done. Trump can respond any way he deems appropiate provided he stays within the boundries of the law. Page is free to throw herself a pity party as well. She just wont be receiving any from me.

Heres a good question for you;
Once her private texts became public and her open disdain for Trump became infamous, do you think she should of made a public appplogy to him? Maybe of she had, Trump might not of been as harsh toward her as he has been.

The lesson to be learned here is dont pick fights with people bigger than you if you cant take a punch.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

No, she has no obligation to pucker up and kiss Trump's fat ass like his sycophantic supporters. He's President, not King, and being critical of the President IN PRIVATE shouldn't earn any of us public attacks by POTUS at least until we've been convicted of a crime.

I get it - the cruelty is the point. He's punching the libs and that's all that matters. He's a disgrace to the office, but so long as he punches down at liberals like the insecure schoolyard bully he is, you're good with it.

 

[JasperL]

Ask Mueller that question. Why did he remove her from the investigation, if everything she was doing was legal and proper?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I'm asking you and others. Name the acts. Weird that everyone insists they know but can't type out a couple sentences explaining it.

And Mueller never named her part of "the investigation" so how could he "remove her" from it?

 

[JasperL]

When you ask a stupid question, what do you expect?

It's not a stupid question.

In the time it took to respond like that you could have identified the illegal or improper act, linked to an article explaining what SHE did wrong, and yet you didn't do it.

 

[ocean515]

It's not a stupid question.

In the time it took to respond like that you could have identified the illegal or improper act, linked to an article explaining what SHE did wrong, and yet you didn't do it.

Page and Strzok have been the topic of conversation for how long now? 1 year, 2 years? There acts have been clearly identified. They've been fired or demoted.

And you ask these questions? They are stupid, so that is why you get no answer.

 

[US&THEM]

Page and Strzok have been the topic of conversation for how long now? 1 year, 2 years? There acts have been clearly identified. They've been fired or demoted.

And you ask these questions? They are stupid, so that is why you get no answer.

Page left the FBI by her own choice. Strozk and McCabe were fired.

 

[JasperL]

Page and Strzok have been the topic of conversation for how long now? 1 year, 2 years? There acts have been clearly identified. They've been fired or demoted.

And you ask these questions? They are stupid, so that is why you get no answer.

Name the acts by Page that were illegal or improper. If her acts have been clearly identified, show me where, and by whom. Thanks!

 

[ocean515]

Page left the FBI by her own choice. Strozk and McCabe were fired.

Fair enough. How does that change anything?

 

[US&THEM]

Fair enough. How does that change anything?

Look at why McCabe was fired. He was fired for leaking, remember what he was accused for leaking? McCAbe wanted everyone to know the FBI was actively investigating Hillary’s email issue.

Strozk was fired for the personal ant-Trump texts to Page.

Both are suing to get their jobs back.

 

[tres borrachos]

Innocent?
She was literally involved as one of the plotters working to undermine his presidency. She got caught and now is whining about being mocked over it.

Perhsps if she acted more professionally to begin with her fragile delicate feelings would still be in tact.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Can you cite the code that says it's illegal for a woman to text her boyfriend and say (accurately) that Trump shouldn't be President, which is what everyone with a working brain also said? I'd like to know what crime she committed. Being unprofessional isn't a crime. If it was, your crush Trump would have already faced a firing squad.

 

[tres borrachos]

Haha, Americans are cheering on their POTUS, as he leads a smear campaign against an American citizen, 'cause she hurt his feefees. :lamo

What a joke America has become, no wonder it's the laughing stock of the world.

I just got back from Europe again. Yes, we are the laughing stock of the world, and it's because of Trump and the ignorance of the citizens of Trump Fan Nation.

For the first time in my life I'm not proud to be American. Thanks Trump and Trump supporters.

 

[trouble13]

Can you cite the code that says it's illegal for a woman to text her boyfriend and say (accurately) that Trump shouldn't be President, which is what everyone with a working brain also said? I'd like to know what crime she committed. Being unprofessional isn't a crime. If it was, your crush Trump would have already faced a firing squad.

Can you cite where i accussed her of committing a crime. I dont think i ever did.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[trouble13]

I just got back from Europe again. Yes, we are the laughing stock of the world, and it's because of Trump and the ignorance of the citizens of Trump Fan Nation.

For the first time in my life I'm not proud to be American. Thanks Trump and Trump supporters.

You're welcome.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

[tres borrachos]

Can you cite where i accussed her of committing a crime. I dont think i ever did.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Ah, so you agree with Page that she didn't commit a crime.