• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lisa Page's interview

The FBI spokesperson has zero authority to release anything, hence Rosenstein had to ok the release.

Fair enough - the point was mainly that the texts being made public were because DoJ first leaked, then released them. Page had no intention to make her criticisms of Trump made public.
 
Fair enough - the point was mainly that the texts being made public were because DoJ first leaked, then released them. Page had no intention to make her criticisms of Trump made public.

Intent matters here, even with a leak the texts only fueled the rightwing conspiracy nuts.
 
Republicans need to show me ONE time they have EVER criticized a Republican in the FBI for being partisan, when there was no evidence they did anything wrong other than not like a Democrat in office.

They can't. The 'rule' that an FBI official can't have political opinions only applies to Democrats.
 
Rosenstein decided to release the texts, not sure why but he did.

Because he's a Republican and he wanted to please the guy who appointed him, trump?
 
Using that as some sort of a justification is whats silly

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Let's get back to the start of this, you wrote:

The only thing im saying is that her complaining that trump mocked her is silly.


The only thing I'm saying is your premise is absurd, for the facts I've presented, for which you have yet to provide compelling rebuttal.

In fact, it's absurd on it's face, and there is no rebuttal. The facts I've presented are irrefutable. Getting ragged on unjustly by the most powerful in the world with a world wide bully pulpit is worthy of complaint, and it sure as hell isn't silly. Trump has a lot of crazy followers who threaten people he hounds with death threats, this is true.


You are not just being silly, you are being beyond the pale ridiculous, I'm talkin' la la land.

'nuff said.
 
Please provide the proof that she tried to "bring down" Trump.

You mean apart from us finding out that she and her lover planned to undermine Trump, or are you pretending that she's done nothing that would cause others to an unflattering view of her?
 
Really??

How so?

I doubt that most of the people they worked with even knew about it.

Yes really. I said how so. They are public servants. Their work is our property. Doubt all you want. I don’t.
 
It's far more than what they have on Trump at the moment.

Only the blind and ignorant make such statements.

Or Trump supporters.

(One in the same?)
 
OK, that's the worst argument I've ever seen on this subject. Gold Star for that!

She intended them to be private, Trump's people release them to smear her, they're released, Trump smears her for years, and it's HER fault that Trump's minions released the texts and made them public.
No, its a valid counter argument to your position. Your claiming that two comparitively similiar acts are different based on the size of the audience or at least that was your argument until i pointed out that the media made both audience sizes sbout the same. Now your changing your argument and centering it on her intentions.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
I have no idea, did they?
We know there were leaks.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

The answer is no. Comey had a press conference 11 days before the election and I am sure you remeber what he announced on that day.
 
Surely you're not worried about adultery given who's President. He's the greatest adulterer of all time!

More to the point, what illegitimate acts did she take to take down Trump? Specifically.

You know the acts. They've been presented over and over. Obviously you chose to ignore them completely.

The greatest adulterer of all time?

You have no credibility.
 
Yes really. I said how so. They are public servants. Their work is our property. Doubt all you want. I don’t.

Have you been yelling from the rooftops demanding all WH communications concerning Ukraine?
 
wasn't that happening about the same time that the republican presidential candidate was fraudulently working with his now incarcerated personal attorney to pay off a stripper he repeatedly had sexual relations with - because he was then fearful she would expose him and undermine his candidacy

No.

And who was plotting to over turn the will of 63 million American citizens?
 
Let's get back to the start of this, you wrote:




The only thing I'm saying is your premise is absurd, for the facts I've presented, for which you have yet to provide compelling rebuttal.

In fact, it's absurd on it's face, and there is no rebuttal. The facts I've presented are irrefutable. Getting ragged on unjustly by the most powerful in the world with a world wide bully pulpit is worthy of complaint, and it sure as hell isn't silly. Trump has a lot of crazy followers who threaten people he hounds with death threats, this is true.


You are not just being silly, you are being beyond the pale ridiculous, I'm talkin' la la land.

'nuff said.
So you mix in your opinions with facts, declare yourself the victor, and attempt to end any further conversation, lol.

You calling Trumps comments unjust is not a fact, its your opinion. How about her opinions about Trump, do you view them as unjust too... of course you don't, you agree with her. That makes her bias acceptable in your eyes.

Trump has every right to defend himself against smears (your word) being directed at him.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
What seems to be the problem.

You unconditionally believe a married man who paid off the people he was ****ing, while plotting with Russians to insure that he would get sworn in as President.

You Trumpsters ought to know better than to make a argument attacking someone’s virtue.

Total bull****. Just more indoctrinated nonsense from a member of the usual crowd.
 
The answer is no. Comey had a press conference 11 days before the election and I am sure you remeber what he announced on that day.
Your attempting to provide answers you don't have.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Innocent?
She was literally involved as one of the plotters working to undermine his presidency. She got caught and now is whining about being mocked over it.

Perhsps if she acted more professionally to begin with her fragile delicate feelings would still be in tact.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Haha, Americans are cheering on their POTUS, as he leads a smear campaign against an American citizen, 'cause she hurt his feefees. :lamo

What a joke America has become, no wonder it's the laughing stock of the world.
 
Your attempting to provide answers you don't have.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Yes or no

Page and/or Strozk leaked about the Trump investigation before the election? Since they were hell bent and had “insurance” not to let it happen.
 
Only the blind and ignorant make such statements.

Or Trump supporters.

(One in the same?)

Only the deviant and malicious make such statements.

Or Epstein worshipers...

They're usually all one in the same anyway.
 
Haha, Americans are cheering on their POTUS, as he leads a smear campaign against an American citizen, 'cause she hurt his feefees. :lamo

What a joke America has become, no wonder it's the laughing stock of the world.
Am I supposed to feel sorry for her, because I don't.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom