- Joined
- Dec 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,138
- Reaction score
- 807
- Location
- Volunteer State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Those on the radical left do not acknowledge the existence of a unique human organism in the mother's womb. They are the true primeval savages among us.... simply greedy pigs.
Women OWN their bodies and anything within.
It doesn't matter how ****ing unique you think it is, it's a risk to her life. If she wants to take that risk, it's up to her. If not, stay the hell out of her business. She has a right to self preservation that trumps the fetal right to exist.
The primeval savages are those tribal asshats who think their ancestors' ghost stories can justify contemporary tyranny. Women OWN their bodies and anything within. It doesn't matter if some man thinks their god gives them authority to control them. Conservative religious fanatics show the depth of their madness when they value the contents of a woman's womb over the woman herself. That they come on to web sites and shamelessly brag about their ignorance is a mystery but, really, nothing surprises me any more. Being entitled to a subjective ignorance is as much a part of faith as anything.
You want to talk about radical, how radical is a theocrat who treats women like state property?
FYI groups like Planned Parenthood have "secret abortions" with minors that were raped. They provide abortions for rape victims, no questions asked. It actually is a sanctuary for the rapists. That's right. A rapist can bring his rape victim into PP and the abortionist doctors will gladly help abort the baby instead of calling the police.
Of course, a polar bear fetus in the womb is polar bear but not a polar bear. And likewise an elephant fetus in the womb is elephant but not an elephant.
Watch In The Womb Videos Online - National Geographic Channel - Sub-Saharan Africa
Prove it. Please post from a credible source. I trust the police have been called and PP charged if this is truly the case so there should be a police report.
In 2001, 32-year-old Alfaro began sexually assaulting 11-year-old “Caitlin.” She became pregnant at 14 and he took her for an abortion. It is clear no report was filed by the clinic since Alfaro continued to sexually assault Caitlin for approximately a year after the abortion. In 2005, she revealed the situation to her family and they notified the authorities. Alfaro was convicted for predatory criminal sexual assault and given 20 years in prison. [Chicago Tribune, 12-23-2005]
Bailey, 53, began sexually molesting his stepdaughter “Hillary” in 1992 when she was seven years old. He started having intercourse with her when she was 12 and, within two years, he was raping her four or five times a week. Court documents show that, at 16, Hillary became pregnant by Bailey and was taken for an abortion. Given that Bailey continued to assault Hillary for another year, it is evident the abortion clinic did not file a report. After authorities were made aware of the situation, Bailey was arrested, convicted and given 20 years in prison. [Gannette’s Delmarva Now, 6-14-2011 • Ocean City Today, 6-10-2011, 8-12-2011 • Daily Times, 1-7 & 12, 2011]
Those on the radical left do not acknowledge the existence of a unique human organism in the mother's womb. They are the true primeval savages among us.... simply greedy pigs.
FYI groups like Planned Parenthood have "secret abortions" with minors that were raped. They provide abortions for rape victims, no questions asked. It actually is a sanctuary for the rapists. That's right. A rapist can bring his rape victim into PP and the abortionist doctors will gladly help abort the baby instead of calling the police.
Of course it's not hard to find reasonable, moderate sources. Dont use the fact that yours are extremist pro-life sources as an excuse to get out of it.Also, I can provide sources for my post I just made but what is the point?
Actual Cases - Child Predator
I can post more but my heat aches when I post these stories which pro abortion clinics salivate over.
Sorry, but I totally disagree with your characterization of the radical left on this topic. Why drag a true primeval savage down to their level? A savage does not really know what they are doing. This is purposeful conscious thought along with organizational skill applied to killing millions.Those on the radical left do not acknowledge the existence of a unique human organism in the mother's womb. They are the true primeval savages among us.... simply greedy pigs.
Pure tripe.It doesn't matter how ****ing unique you think it is, it's a risk to her life. If she wants to take that risk, it's up to her. If not, stay the hell out of her business. She has a right to self preservation that trumps the fetal right to exist.
The primeval savages are those tribal asshats who think their ancestors' ghost stories can justify contemporary tyranny. Women OWN their bodies and anything within. It doesn't matter if some man thinks their god gives them authority to control them. Conservative religious fanatics show the depth of their madness when they value the contents of a woman's womb over the woman herself. That they come on to web sites and shamelessly brag about their ignorance is a mystery but, really, nothing surprises me any more. Being entitled to a subjective ignorance is as much a part of faith as anything.
You want to talk about radical, how radical is a theocrat who treats women like state property?
Actual Cases - Child Predator
I can post more but my heat aches when I post these stories which pro abortion clinics salivate over.
Of course, a polar bear fetus in the womb is polar bear but not a polar bear. And likewise an elephant fetus in the womb is elephant but not an elephant.
Watch In The Womb Videos Online - National Geographic Channel - Sub-Saharan Africa
When the radical pro-aborts on this site complain and wonder why I compare you to slavery supporters, don't wonder. This is why.
You cannot ever rightfully own another human being. Your support for legally owning other human beings, D_N, is utterly contemptible.
D_Natured or Disturbed_Nature?
A child should not be provided a death sentence for the crimes of the father. That my friend is unconstitutional/undemocratic.
FYI groups like Planned Parenthood have "secret abortions" with minors that were raped.
They provide abortions for rape victims, no questions asked. It actually is a sanctuary for the rapists. That's right. A rapist can bring his rape victim into PP and the abortionist doctors will gladly help abort the baby instead of calling the police.
Pure tripe.
We have nothing even approaching a theocratic state in the US.
Although the expressions in your post show symptoms of voluntary cretinism, we should appreciate all human forms even with expressions so afixed to a subhuman point on the scale.
Religion doesn't have to have anything to do with it. This claim of theocracy grows stale from inapplicability. I am not religious whatsoever, so how do you account for that?
The basics of humanity should apply. Now some may be born lacking this human quality, either congenitally or voluntarily renouncing that common bond with other humans, informed by most of us from our conscience, that inner voice that tells one what is right and wrong. Lacking that, one indeed should probably seek the guidance of a religion or good philosophy so as not to go off the rails and do something one shouldn't. But that is generally not a prerequisite if one, from womb on is able to develop this inner voice of good guidance.
Women want and are given choices, more than ever in the history of the planet...
all the way up until they conceive another totally distinct human.
Then the only truly lawful way to put that other human to death is after they have been properly adjudicated to have committed a capital crime.
Period.
Theocracy = a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god. Sorry, try as you will, we DO NOT have that here. We DO have a republican form of democracy and if WE, the people, vote in legislatures and Presidents that agree with us,even should most have a religious viewpoint, sorry, that is how it goes. It cannot be a specific church or a specific god but WE, you know the People, get to decide and you cannot exclude people from having religious views. Not under our Constitution.First of all, we have god in our pledge and on our money. Deal with reality, if you can. Secondly, if the only argument against legal abortion is religious, then theocrats they are. If we can't find a secular argument against granting women the right to defend themselves from physical intruders, there isn't one.
... if you appreciate zygotes the same way you appreciate fully actualized women, you're crazy even before you begin speaking in tongues or asking invisible beings for favors. Fetuses are not sub-human, they are pre-human. A person is more than just a DNA signature.
Saying religion has nothing to do with it when the religious dominate the anti-choice side of the debate is the height of ignorance and denial... If you remove the people who attach their god's magic to another woman's fetus, the ones left, with the secular arguments, would be statistically zero.
... There is no excuse for believing in a supernature that demands we treat women like chattel. I think your "little voice" is a misogynist.
If it's not equality, it's not worth mentioning. Men can defend themselves from threats but women can't, is your ridiculous stance.
OK, genius, when you start claiming that a newly conceived zygote has more rights than the woman who bears it, you have crossed the line into Sillytown. When you further imply that it is "distinct, while it is living inside and threatening the life of a woman, you've gone further into Retardedville. The zygote has distinct DNA but it is not a distinct organism until some woman risks her life growing it inside her and allows it to burst forth into life...
Obviously, Roe vs. Wade proves that statement to be utterly absurd and a big fat lie. ...
Thought experiment where you left the thinking out. Kind of hard to do no?Lets use this hypothetical thought experiment. Can a Siamese twin just arbitrarily kill its twin? Since they are attached and all?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?