• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

@LibsofTikTok

I think she is a coward for bitching about being identified.
So she's a coward for being concerned about threats and harassment for her political views?

That bitch Taylor Lorenz already admitted to harassing her family at their home following the article of the doxxing.
 
You do know the professor in your OP is a college professor, not someone who is teaching 7 year olds, right? The good news is you don't have to send your children to Old Dominion.
It doesn't matter what age group he's teaching. He's advocating legitimizing pedophilia. That is sick on so many levels.
 
So she's a coward for being concerned about threats and harassment for her political views?

That bitch Taylor Lorenz already admitted to harassing her family at their home following the article of the doxxing.

Threats and harassment are not appropriate. If her family is being harassed they should call the police.

Has that “bitch” been charged with harassment or is this just more victimhood?
 
It doesn't matter what age group he's teaching. He's advocating legitimizing pedophilia. That is sick on so many levels.

This may come as a complete shock but pedophilia IS a LEGITIMATE mental illness.
 
Only the simple minded think research to PREVENT sexual assault of children is “soft-on-pedophilia”.

It’s like some people would rather we remain ignorant of ways to treat people with pedophilia.
Sorry, there's no debating what he/she did. It was -- in her own words -- an argument to destigmatize the desire to have sex with children. That is being soft on it.

Her motives are only truly known to her, but not her actions.
 
The next time you come across an OP that poses a problem that our friends on the left have difficulty explaining away, count how many of them take the time and effort to reply with something like:
  • Why is this important?
  • Who cares?
  • What exactly is this supposed to mean?
  • Is this a crime?
  • What?
  • Where?

I think we should call this their "Vinnie Barbarino strategy."


Awwww.... The sound bite approach didn't work out so well? Any other yucky topics to discuss?
 
This may come as a complete shock but pedophilia IS a LEGITIMATE mental illness.
What the person is advocating goes beyond that. As in the legality of it.
 
Sorry, there's no debating what he/she did. It was -- in her own words -- an argument to destigmatize the desire to have sex with children. That is being soft on it.

Her motives are only truly known to her, but not her actions.

Hypothetical for you... Let's say we discover as cheek swab test for pedophilia that is 100% accurate a month from now. We test 100 people and 10 turn up positive. What should we do with the 10 who test positive?
 
I think when a major media outlet like The Washington Post uses its resources to dox a private citizen whose opinions they don't like, there's an argument to be made.
Not to mention the fact that 2 of it's employees, one of whom is Lorenz, emphasizes the fact that the person is an Orthodox Jew. Makes you wonder about their ethnic views.
 
What the person is advocating goes beyond that. As in the legality of it.

Complete bullshit... The professor is arguing for TREATMENT of pedophilia before assault on children happens...
 
Hypothetical for you... Let's say we discover as cheek swab test for pedophilia that is 100% accurate a month from now. We test 100 people and 10 turn up positive. What should we do with the 10 who test positive?
For starters, keep them away from children.
 
Hypothetical for you... Let's say we discover as cheek swab test for pedophilia that is 100% accurate a month from now. We test 100 people and 10 turn up positive. What should we do with the 10 who test positive?
... and after that, perhaps see if Disney is hiring.
 
Complete bullshit... The professor is arguing for TREATMENT of pedophilia before assault on children happens...
You're right. I stand corrected.

I thought we were discussing another Pro Pedo freak professor.
 
How? Court order? Let's assume all 10 have never acted on the desire. What now?
Your hypothetical was not realistic given its 100% certainty, but nevertheless, you have my answer. And yes, a court order would be one method.
 
Your hypothetical was not realistic given its 100% certainty, but nevertheless, you have my answer. And yes, a court order would be one method.

So you would violate the constitutional rights of these people for simply being mentally ill? Yeah, I have your answer... LMAO...
 
If you've not been following the developments swirling around the formerly anonymous Twitter user @LibsofTikTok over the last week, it's worth a news search and reading about it. This woman has drawn the ire of the progressive left (and even of The Washington Post, but I repeat myself) for doing nothing more than curating social media posts of school teachers and university professors steeped in trans ideology. She shines a light on these educators own public social media posts as a way of highlighting what they advocate, both in public policy and in the classroom.

Here are two examples:





And for this she's vilified.

Im still waiting to know what transgender ideology is? Nobody will tell me what this supposed evil idea is.
 
billboard10-1.jpg


Church_Billboard.jpg

Yes, pastors can be woke too.
 
Back
Top Bottom