Are you intentionally sidestepping that point, or are you incapable of understanding?
Why do you think too wrongs make a right?> Have i ever claimed that was good?
Damn. That a stupid argument.
That is the point of a private school. They have tailored setting for parents who want such things. It is for like minded people, weather religeous, technical, etc. They get to set their admission standards.
Don't like it. Too damn bad.
Why one and not another? My whole point is that you have agendas filtrating the schools, against the parents wishes, that teach the children things the parents are against in the formative years.
But then you seem to demand such grooming.
How can you net see it? Are you really blind to it, or are you pretending to be?
The ones I know are not like that. It is only a few who are perverted to wanting to groom children.
Then what is all the heated debates about? haven't you seen all this in the past?
What in hell are you talking about. My God. You are acting like it is all of them I speak of. It is only a few radicalized ones, but you accept the radicals. The radical ones need to be shunned. Not supported.
I am incapable of understanding your logic or use of words. Remember, I don't fall for conspiracy theories.
I don't know what wrongs you'd be talking about? Only 1 I mentioned was referring to priests grooming boys.
That seems to be the only grooming in religions or schools.
You claim to hate schools grooming, but then want public money used for private schools that actually has a history of perverts and sex assault.
If they have tailored settings, then they can keep them, but they don't get public money. We don't need to have public money promoting discrimination.
Stupid points call for stupid arguments. Don't claim schools are grooming children. That is pure stupidity and a stupid reply is the result.
Here's another stupid point you keep wanting to bring up. Even though I told you there's no grooming, I don't want grooming. Your claims about grooming are likely lies or misinformation you read and push.
Why would you think I want grooming when I told you no public money to private schools who's only purpose is to groom. Either to hate other people or groom them into believing they have to hate other people so they don't burn in some firey lake for eternity.
You tell me I am for grooming, but it is you that actually want to promote grooming by using public money in private grooming schools.
You pay for your own grooming. I want no part of that sick world of manipulation and lying to children
Now, do you wish to tell lies about me wanting grooming or will you respond with valid points and issues. And not dive into BS nonsense about grooming.
The LGBT people you know are not like what? You are calling that group something but you don't know any who actually act like this thing you claimed? Maybe the issue isn't real? Or your like those parents and blowing it all out of proportion?
You know LGBT people don't groom, yet you worry about LGBT people grooming. It seems your reality of the people you know, don't fit the reality of what you want to claim. Seems likes it's made up.
You're the one acting like it's a national problem and all LGBT people want to do is groom children. Don't make a mountain out of a mole hill then.
I've been trying to tell you it's not a national issue. Now you're telling me you know it's maybe a handful or less of people in the entire county?
Every group has people that are extreme or radical. That doesn't mean we need to make laws or denigrate the entire group for a radical few.
You were blowing this grooming thing all out of proportion. And now you admit it's just a few people?
See, it's not a big issue.