• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Let them in!

How much are you willing to spend to prove you didn't earn that income?

If you have ever dealt with a government office, you will know you will have to prove you didn't earn it as it was reported iunder your number.

You should talk to people this has happened to and see how easy it was to resolve.

Also your refund will be held up until the situation is resolved, if they don't come after you criminally for not reporting extra income.

I actually did have the pleasure of an audit, and appeared on my own behalf. It was not pleasant, but it got resolved.

Since then I have twice had written questions, and answered them promptly. No further problems.

Ooops, I never get a refund.
 
Sorry you cannot understand the response I gave, and then you have to deflect from reality to cover up for your lack of knowledge. Since you have posted no source for your comment I will assume it is something your heard from one of your gods on Faux.

Its called the CAM program. Look it up its designed for refugee parents who are now living in the US the request the kids who are living back in their home country to be given refugee status as well and gets a free travel to the US to reunite them.
Maybe you can answer the proposed question instead of deflecting.
Why would a parent leave to the US seeking protection from persecution and leave their kids behind to be subjected to such persecution?
 
Its called the CAM program. Look it up its designed for refugee parents who are now living in the US the request the kids who are living back in their home country to be given refugee status as well and gets a free travel to the US to reunite them.
Maybe you can answer the proposed question instead of deflecting.
Why would a parent leave to the US seeking protection from persecution and leave their kids behind to be subjected to such persecution?

Oh, you mean this program that your god Trump eliminated:

"In-Country Refugee/Parole Processing for Minors in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala (Central American Minors – CAM)

Español

Update: On Nov. 9, 2017, the Department of State stopped accepting new applications for the Central American Minors (CAM) refugee program. USCIS will stop interviewing CAM cases on Jan. 31, 2018. After that date, individuals with pending applications who have not been interviewed will receive a notice with further instructions.

The decision to terminate the CAM refugee program was made as part of the U.S. government review of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for FY 2018.

The CAM program was established in 2014 to provide certain minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras the opportunity to be considered, while still in their home country, for refugee resettlement in the United States. Individuals who were determined to be ineligible for refugee status were then considered by USCIS for the possibility of entering the United States under parole. The parole portion of the CAM program was terminated in August 2017.

Please visit the Department of State’s website for more information.

Effective immediately, USCIS will no longer consider or offer parole under the CAM Parole program.
USCIS published a Federal Register notice announcing the termination on August 16, 2017.
The termination of the CAM Parole program does not affect the CAM Refugee program and its operation.
See the CAM: Information for Parole Applicants page for additional information."

Now, explain to me what is so hard to understand by a right winger like you that one may not want to drag a child across 3000 miles of countryside with no food, no water, and no place to sleep? Is that too hard for you to grasp, or is it something you would do seeing as to how you don't give a **** about the children, and the danger presented to the parent.
 
Oh, you mean this program that your god Trump eliminated:

"In-Country Refugee/Parole Processing for Minors in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala (Central American Minors – CAM)

Español

Update: On Nov. 9, 2017, the Department of State stopped accepting new applications for the Central American Minors (CAM) refugee program. USCIS will stop interviewing CAM cases on Jan. 31, 2018. After that date, individuals with pending applications who have not been interviewed will receive a notice with further instructions.

The decision to terminate the CAM refugee program was made as part of the U.S. government review of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for FY 2018.

The CAM program was established in 2014 to provide certain minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras the opportunity to be considered, while still in their home country, for refugee resettlement in the United States. Individuals who were determined to be ineligible for refugee status were then considered by USCIS for the possibility of entering the United States under parole. The parole portion of the CAM program was terminated in August 2017.

Please visit the Department of State’s website for more information.

Effective immediately, USCIS will no longer consider or offer parole under the CAM Parole program.
USCIS published a Federal Register notice announcing the termination on August 16, 2017.
The termination of the CAM Parole program does not affect the CAM Refugee program and its operation.
See the CAM: Information for Parole Applicants page for additional information."

Now, explain to me what is so hard to understand by a right winger like you that one may not want to drag a child across 3000 miles of countryside with no food, no water, and no place to sleep? Is that too hard for you to grasp, or is it something you would do seeing as to how you don't give a **** about the children, and the danger presented to the parent.

I don't understand that why I was hoping you would enlighten me with something I wasn't grasping. When you try and think about it from their perspective, they are poor with a government that is inept or doesn't give a **** and they are being rapped and slaughtered. Ok sounds like a perfect reason to leave. But then their choice. 1.)Stay 2.)Take their kids with them and leave 3.)Send just their kids and try and come later when you can 4.)Go yourself and leave your kids hoping you can go back and grab them later. We established #1 sucks. #2 Im assuming its cause they don't have means aka money for them all to go. But the choice between #3 and #4 I don't get. If you don't want to make a simple argument and trying to reason why they would make that choice that's fine, we don't have to have further discussion.
 
I don't understand that why I was hoping you would enlighten me with something I wasn't grasping. When you try and think about it from their perspective, they are poor with a government that is inept or doesn't give a **** and they are being rapped and slaughtered. Ok sounds like a perfect reason to leave. But then their choice. 1.)Stay 2.)Take their kids with them and leave 3.)Send just their kids and try and come later when you can 4.)Go yourself and leave your kids hoping you can go back and grab them later. We established #1 sucks. #2 Im assuming its cause they don't have means aka money for them all to go. But the choice between #3 and #4 I don't get. If you don't want to make a simple argument and trying to reason why they would make that choice that's fine, we don't have to have further discussion.

I am sadly getting quite used to the right wing partisan constantly changing the argument, and then making asinine comments like "and trying to reason why they would make that choice". Where is the choice between 3 & 4 you speak of? Trump did away with protecting the children if they arrived alone (and right wingers ridiculed the program), and no sane parent would send their child on a 3000 mile journey with no means of support. Then there is number 4 which you have already denigrated, and seem to have forgotten you did so.

If you want to continue making such asinine comments rather then rational arguments then you will have to do it with yourself.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a2c3cbefc578

"The Trump administration on Wednesday formally terminated an Obama-era program that granted Central American minors temporary legal residence in the United States, shutting the door on 2,714 people who had won conditional approval to enter the country.

President Barack Obama’s administration established the “CAM parole” program in 2014 to respond to a massive spike in the number of unaccompanied minors and families entering the country illegally from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. Under the terms, minors who failed to win refu*gee status could enter on a two-year, renewable parole if they had a parent already legally present in the country.

But the program’s future was put in doubt in February when the Department of Homeland Security froze it and announced an internal review as part of President Trump’s executive orders aimed at tightening immigration controls.

DHS’s termination announcement in the federal register means that the agency will begin the process of notifying families that the minors who had been approved for entry would have to reapply through other immigration channels that could be more difficult."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom