• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Leftist Trump-opposing women in the US will now go on a 4-year sex strike to oppose Trump even more.

Checkerboard Strangler said:
Yeah I've seen 1000 Pound Sisters on reality TV so you didn't need to point that out.

View attachment 67542431
Click to expand...


A lot of people have trouble with information that cuts against their biases. Let’s see what SCIENCE has to say.

Conservatives Really are Better Looking Research says:


Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs - PubMed

Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the "halo effect" are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Don’t be angry, be beautiful.
 
It makes it easier for them to explain why they can't get any guy to screw them in the first place.
 
Bighorn66 said:
A lot of people have trouble with information that cuts against their biases. Let’s see what SCIENCE has to say.

Conservatives Really are Better Looking Research says:


Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs - PubMed

Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the "halo effect" are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Don’t be angry, be beautiful.
Click to expand...
She didn't get the message

Debbie Schultz.webp
 
This was brought up as a protest tactic when Roe vs. Wade was overturned. It went nowhere then and it'll go nowhere now.
 
Bighorn66 said:
A lot of people have trouble with information that cuts against their biases. Let’s see what SCIENCE has to say.

Conservatives Really are Better Looking Research says:


Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs - PubMed

Physical attractiveness is an important social factor in our daily interactions. Scholars in social psychology provide evidence that attractiveness stereotypes and the "halo effect" are prominent in affecting the traits we attribute to others. However, the interest in attractiveness has not...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Don’t be angry, be beautiful.
Click to expand...

"Controlling for socioeconomic status" means "if you throw all the poor rednecks aside".
It was very entertaining watching you self-own like that.

The thousand pound sisters are your spirit animals whether you like it or not.
Pretending that only the rich Republicans are the ones who count in a study isn't going to help you.
 
They got this idea from the "The Contest" episode of Seinfeld. This should meet with equal success.
 
lolol

It's always the fat, ugly chicks making threats about witholding sex.

Screenshot (276).webpScreenshot (276).webp
 
Having grown up as a middle kid between two sisters and a mother who all have a sense of self-worth and are successful in their own ways in terms of their professions and family. Having dealt with the same in the workplace with women who were either working for me or that I worked for...

If they don't wish to have sex with anyone, they aren't going to. Period. As my wife once put it, women don't need men for sexual gratification as long as they have a good vibrator. Men, on the other hand...will have issues. I mean, it's why we have incels.

And I love the reactions of these he-men who honestly think that women can't live without their wonderful dicks...how could they possibly live without their glorious cocks and not be lesbians... That narcissistic bullshit is just laughable.

Now, will there be a nationwide movement for women to deny men sex? (shrugs) Perhaps, perhaps not. But I can tell you MAGA straight (supposedly) males out there...unless a woman wears her politics on her shirt, or somewhere obvious...you won't know where she's at. And if you find that you are getting shot down a bit more than normal...you might want to consider if you are wearing your politics for everyone to see, or just acting like a MAGA-douchebag. Because if that is what you are presenting, I am willing to bet a lot more women are going to walk away from you. So, just be ready for getting shot down more than normal and give your hand a lady's name.

Luckily for me, it's not a problem. The wife and I are happily married and on the same page.
 
Checkerboard Strangler said:
"Controlling for socioeconomic status" means "if you throw all the poor rednecks aside".
It was very entertaining watching you self-own like that.

The thousand pound sisters are your spirit animals whether you like it or not.
Pretending that only the rich Republicans are the ones who count in a study isn't going to help you.
Click to expand...
You’re lying. Nowhere in the study does it say what you quoted and emboldened. You can cry and moan and stomp your feet and make up shit, but it stands. There are multiple studies that have shown this to be the case.

The lack of scientific intelligence among Progressives knows no boundaries.
 
Jason Warfield said:
Having grown up as a middle kid between two sisters and a mother who all have a sense of self-worth and are successful in their own ways in terms of their professions and family. Having dealt with the same in the workplace with women who were either working for me or that I worked for...

If they don't wish to have sex with anyone, they aren't going to. Period. As my wife once put it, women don't need men for sexual gratification as long as they have a good vibrator. Men, on the other hand...will have issues. I mean, it's why we have incels.

And I love the reactions of these he-men who honestly think that women can't live without their wonderful dicks...how could they possibly live without their glorious cocks and not be lesbians... That narcissistic bullshit is just laughable.

Now, will there be a nationwide movement for women to deny men sex? (shrugs) Perhaps, perhaps not. But I can tell you MAGA straight (supposedly) males out there...unless a woman wears her politics on her shirt, or somewhere obvious...you won't know where she's at. And if you find that you are getting shot down a bit more than normal...you might want to consider if you are wearing your politics for everyone to see, or just acting like a MAGA-douchebag. Because if that is what you are presenting, I am willing to bet a lot more women are going to walk away from you. So, just be ready for getting shot down more than normal and give your hand a lady's name.

Luckily for me, it's not a problem. The wife and I are happily married and on the same page.
Click to expand...


Looking at the liberal women who permeate those liberal protests I don't think many men will be all that bothered.
 
Bighorn66 said:
You’re lying. Nowhere in the study does it say what you quoted and emboldened. You can cry and moan and stomp your feet and make up shit, but it stands. There are multiple studies that have shown this to be the case.

The lack of scientific intelligence among Progressives knows no boundaries.
Click to expand...


Provide us with an alternate explanation for

"Controlling for socioeconomic status"

Give us an alternate definition, please.
 
Paradoxical said:
I think you misunderstood me. I already have the love of my life. And she's a Republican so no worries about this new plan by Democrat feminists.
Click to expand...
Really? Anna Paulina Luna is your partner? The photo you cropped from the article is your partner?

prisioneroenargentina.com

Otra (supuesta) mentirosa en el Congreso de los Estados Unidos | Prisionero en Argentina

♦ A estas alturas, mucha gente sabe sobre el mentiroso en serie Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) que inventó casi todo su currículum y afirmó ser judío en la campaña electoral. Se enfrenta a varias investigaciones y renunció a sus asignaciones en el comité, pero todavía está de alguna manera en el...
prisioneroenargentina.com prisioneroenargentina.com

"Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is an Air Force veteran and former Obama supporter who used to be called Anna Paulina Mayerhofer before she switched parties to run for Congress. He is now a member of the House Freedom Caucus and has argued that House members should be able to bring firearms to committee."
 
Argent said:
Really? Anna Paulina Luna is your partner? The photo you cropped from the article is your partner?

prisioneroenargentina.com

Otra (supuesta) mentirosa en el Congreso de los Estados Unidos | Prisionero en Argentina

♦ A estas alturas, mucha gente sabe sobre el mentiroso en serie Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) que inventó casi todo su currículum y afirmó ser judío en la campaña electoral. Se enfrenta a varias investigaciones y renunció a sus asignaciones en el comité, pero todavía está de alguna manera en el...
prisioneroenargentina.com prisioneroenargentina.com

"Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) is an Air Force veteran and former Obama supporter who used to be called Anna Paulina Mayerhofer before she switched parties to run for Congress. He is now a member of the House Freedom Caucus and has argued that House members should be able to bring firearms to committee."
Click to expand...
Okeeeeyyy?
 
Paradoxical said:
Okeeeeyyy?
Click to expand...
If she is your wife then you just outed your identity so you might want to have that post deleted unless you don't care about your privacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom