- Joined
- Feb 28, 2011
- Messages
- 10,566
- Reaction score
- 7,961
- Location
- So. California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Read more: Lawyers to ask Wis. court to rule in prayer death - NewsTimes
Im sorry, but a child health trumps a silly religous belief. Especially when the disease is treatable.
Unf---ing real!
This kind of nonsense should not be allowed to happen.
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A couple who prayed while their daughter slowly died of diabetes will try Tuesday to persuade the state Supreme Court to overturn their homicide convictions, arguing state law protects them from prosecution.
The case presents charged questions for the court about where religious freedom ends. The justices for the first time will have to weigh whether the state's faith-healing exemptions protect parents from criminal liability if their choices lead to a child's death.
It is a horrible practice, but they should be allowed to do it, and their convictions should be overturned.
It's a horrible practice, but they should be allowed to kill their child.
Is that what you are saying?
It is a horrible practice, but they should be allowed to do it, and their convictions should be overturned.
They didn't kill their child, diabetes did....
They didn't kill their child, diabetes did....
They didn't kill their child, diabetes did....
They didn't kill their child, diabetes did....
Since diabetes is entirely treatable, that's a little like arguing that a parent who never feeds their kid didn't kill the kid, starvation did.
The parents should be in jail, what they did to their daughter was un-freaking believable. What the state should have done was take her away, and get her the proper medical attention she needed. If an adult wants to forgo treatment due to religious beliefs then fine, but a parent should not have the right to kill their child because of a religious belief they hold.
They didn't kill their child, diabetes did....
LOL. No, they neglected their child and failed to get medical attention that she needed. I blame them and their silly beliefs.
Since diabetes is entirely treatable, that's a little like arguing that a parent who never feeds their kid didn't kill the kid, starvation did.
Another victim of faith healing...
And abortion is hardly ever necessary but we don't mind when women have their babies brains blended out do we?
What if the parents deliberately withheld food, from their child because they believed God would ensure their child wouldn't starve to death?
What if the parents left their child in the middle of the busy highway because they believed God would ensure their child's safety?
What if the parents threw their child in tiger exhibit at the zoo because they believed God would ensure their child's safety?
When the Godless side of the aisle rails against Darwinism, and the pro-abortion side of the aisle suddenly rails against parental rights, I LOL at their silly hypocrisy.
Ah. A totally irrelevant off-topic response. Well argued.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?