- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 39,593
- Reaction score
- 13,575
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Part of the complexity of deciding what is our normal climate,
Is that we live in a very cyclic system.
We have a 24 hour Daily Cycle, that is superimposed onto a 365.25 annual cycle,
that is superimposed onto an 11 year sunspot cycle.
The entire premise behind AGW, is that extra Co2 is adding enough time lag(latency)
to the energy leaving earth, that the energy persists longer than the cool down cycle.
Each unit of energy which survives the cycle, accumulates.
While I think there are several weaknesses in this concept,
What I would like input on in this thread, is how much latency does each unit of Co2 add.
There are places at the same latitude which receive equal hours of sunlight, and have the same
Co2 levels, yet have vastly different warm up and cool down cycles.
Is that we live in a very cyclic system.
We have a 24 hour Daily Cycle, that is superimposed onto a 365.25 annual cycle,
that is superimposed onto an 11 year sunspot cycle.
The entire premise behind AGW, is that extra Co2 is adding enough time lag(latency)
to the energy leaving earth, that the energy persists longer than the cool down cycle.
Each unit of energy which survives the cycle, accumulates.
While I think there are several weaknesses in this concept,
What I would like input on in this thread, is how much latency does each unit of Co2 add.
There are places at the same latitude which receive equal hours of sunlight, and have the same
Co2 levels, yet have vastly different warm up and cool down cycles.