• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Kash Patel

george48

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
4,329
Reaction score
2,779
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Socialist
Seriously?

He is certifiable...

He said he wants to go after Trumps enemies...

Seriously?
 
Yeah, lol, from the party opposed to weaponizing government.
 
A
No. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy.
So you are cool with dems, no matte4 how bad, being arraigned? If just guilty of being anti trump?
 
A
So you are cool with dems, no matte4 how bad, being arraigned? If just guilty of being anti trump?
? On what legal grounds would someone be arraigned for being anti-Trump?
 
These people don't need a reason.
The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution. He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.
 
The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution.
He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.
Yes, exactly.
 
The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution. He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.

Yes-- however in doing so it simply employs the oldest rule of politics:

What goes around, comes around.
 
Except that it never "went around" in the first place.

Oh of course it did.
It really can't be denied.
James, Willis and Bragg all said if they were elected in their respected elections, they would go after Trump.
And so they were elected, and they went after him.
 
Oh of course it did.
It really can't be denied.
James, Willis and Bragg all said if they were elected in their respected elections, they would go after Trump.
And so they were elected, and they went after him.
And he was convicted of the charges by a unanimous jury—beyond a reasonable doubt.

If you don’t like our judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China, or perhaps Saudi Arabia?
 
And he was convicted of the charges by a unanimous jury—beyond a reasonable doubt.

If you don’t like our judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China, or perhaps Saudi Arabia?

Then why all the talk of preemptive pardons and concern of a 'hit list' prepared by Kash Patel?
If charges are not sufficiently supported, the accused will be acquitted.
If you don't like out judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China or perhaps Saudi Arabia?
 
Then why all the talk of preemptive pardons and concern of a 'hit list' prepared by Kash Patel?
If charges are not sufficiently supported, the accused will be acquitted.
If you don't like out judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China or perhaps Saudi Arabia?
Didn't like it, did you?
 
Seriously?

He is certifiable...

He said he wants to go after Trumps enemies...

Seriously?
Yes, I hope he does. The enemy within needs to be destroyed. Go, Kash! (y)
 
Yes, I hope he does. The enemy within needs to be destroyed. Go, Kash! (y)
You want your fellow always to be destroyed
 
Back
Top Bottom