Are you cheering him then? Hypocrisy?Yeah, lol, from the party opposed to weaponizing government.
But I guess it's lols to youYeah, lol, from the party opposed to weaponizing government.
No. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy.Are you cheering him then? Hypocrisy?
So you are cool with dems, no matte4 how bad, being arraigned? If just guilty of being anti trump?No. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy.
Lefties are wetting their pants, isn't it fund to watch.Seriously?
He is certifiable...
He said he wants to go after Trumps enemies...
Seriously?
? On what legal grounds would someone be arraigned for being anti-Trump?A
So you are cool with dems, no matte4 how bad, being arraigned? If just guilty of being anti trump?
These people don't need a reason.? On what legal grounds would someone be arraigned for being anti-Trump?
The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution. He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.These people don't need a reason.
Yes, exactly.The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution.
He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.
No. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy.
I don’t know why anyone is surprised by Trump’s picks.Seriously?
He is certifiable...
He said he wants to go after Trumps enemies...
Seriously?
The courts would. Patel is an moron. He would simply squander DOJ resources and force defendants to spend money against malicious prosecution. He would do exactly what the MAGA folks here erroneously claim Trump prosecutors have been engaged in.
Yep. Keep that in mind.Yes-- however in doing so it simply employs the oldest rule of politics:
What goes around, comes around.
Except that it never "went around" in the first place.Yes-- however in doing so it simply employs the oldest rule of politics:
What goes around, comes around.
Except that it never "went around" in the first place.
And he was convicted of the charges by a unanimous jury—beyond a reasonable doubt.Oh of course it did.
It really can't be denied.
James, Willis and Bragg all said if they were elected in their respected elections, they would go after Trump.
And so they were elected, and they went after him.
And he was convicted of the charges by a unanimous jury—beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you don’t like our judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China, or perhaps Saudi Arabia?
Didn't like it, did you?Then why all the talk of preemptive pardons and concern of a 'hit list' prepared by Kash Patel?
If charges are not sufficiently supported, the accused will be acquitted.
If you don't like out judicial system, might I suggest Russia, China or perhaps Saudi Arabia?
You've been wetting your pants over all manner of things. And it hasn't been fun for us, either.Lefties are wetting their pants, isn't it fund to watch.
Yes, I hope he does. The enemy within needs to be destroyed. Go, Kash!Seriously?
He is certifiable...
He said he wants to go after Trumps enemies...
Seriously?
You want your fellow always to be destroyedYes, I hope he does. The enemy within needs to be destroyed. Go, Kash!![]()
I think you're missing his point.....read again.A
So you are cool with dems, no matte4 how bad, being arraigned? If just guilty of being anti trump?