• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Karzai’s Isolation Worries Afghans and the West

donsutherland1

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
11,691
Reaction score
9,981
Location
New York
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Today, The New York Times revealed:

The two men who resigned over the weekend, Interior Minister Hanif Atmar and the intelligence director, Amrullah Saleh, had strong relationships with American and British officials and were seen as being among the most competent of his cabinet members, said several Western officials in Kabul. Mr. Saleh, in particular, had built an intelligence agency that the West had come to depend on in a region where reliable partners are hard to find, they said.

Their ready dismissals have left the sense that, in trying to ensure his own survival, Mr. Karzai will not hesitate to make decisions counter to the interests of his staunchest Western allies or the Afghan government as a whole, or even to make decisions that seem counter to his own long-term interests.
News Analysis - Karzai

This development does not surprise me, but it renews my concerns about U.S. policy being overly reliant on Kabul and Mr. Karzai. What I noted in a November 2009 discussion (http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...his-war-options-changed-2.html#post1058360373) on U.S. strategy planning for what led to the troop surge in Afghanistan, namely its Kabul-centric orientation, is worth restating.

Although I agree that additional manpower is needed, I believe a full discussion needs to examine, among other things, the past experiences concerning Czarist, British, and Soviet forces in Afghanistan, the failure of earlier "surges" to bring about a stable outcome, and Afghanistan's historically decentralized framework in which tribal leaders/local institutions play a larger role than its central government. Former Soviet President Gorbachev's warning, while unpleasant, goes to the heart of the convergence of Afghanstan's history and lack of governance structure. The Soviets had much greater manpower and much freer operating constraints and still failed to pacify Afghanistan.

Currently, Kabul is defined by corruption, cronyism, and incompetence, if not leadership that may not adequately represent all of Afghanistan's various ethnic or tribal groups. Afghanistan remains closer to a failed state than a viable national unit. The leadership issue is one that the military planners need to address. In the wake of previous failed strategies, they have a genuine burden to address the issues as to why the previous troop surges in Afghanistan, including one from earlier this year, proved ineffective, why their earlier plans failed to foresee how events unfolded to date, why one should have confidence that the outcome this time around will be different given Afghanistan's historic experience and current dynamics. They need to identify who specifically will be the key tribal leaders whose efforts will be leveraged in implementing the plan and how reliable have they been in the past. They need to identify what local institutions will be relied upon to complement the efforts of the additional troops, among others.


Although I continue to hope for the best in Afghanistan, the deeply flawed focus around Mr. Karzai undermines prospects for U.S. success. Given the strategic importance of a successful outcome in Afghanistan, I believe this latest development only adds to the urgency of a policy correction there. Otherwise, the gains in Afghanistan will be less than otherwise might have been possible and there will remain a risk that they could be lost altogether in the more distant future.
 

justabubba

long standing member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
49,737
Reaction score
31,562
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
shades of diem
the comparisons to the political situation in a failed south vietnam campaign are uncanny
JFK and the Diem Coup
 
Top Bottom