• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kari Lake meets with Florida man at mar-a-lago. Says she will become governor of Colorado. After she lost of course.

Gore, to this day, still makes comments that illudes to him thinking he won.
He may allude to it but that is a far cry from what Trump and now Lake say and do. They are very direct, loud and forceful about having the election stolen and being the real winners.
 
The same cloth as Stacy Abrams, Al Gore, and Hillary?
You still don't answer the poster's question.

Do you think Kari Lake won for governor of AZ?

You instead jumped right over the poster's question to Al Gore in 2000 v Bush. Then to Stacy Abrams and Hillary.

So you tripped over your own attempt at fancy footwork.
 
AZ Republican former governor Jan Brewer called Democrat Katie Hobbs to congratulate her on becoming Governor-Elect.

AZ Republican term limited outgoing Gov. Doug Ducy called Hobbs to congratulate her on her victory in the governors race.

Each of 'em said they've looked at the dwindling outstanding vote and concluded Hobbs is the winner.

Each of 'em are calling on Lake to concede, without success of course. With Lake Trump comes first and foremost above all else. Lake is irredeemable and unyielding -- she needs to be dealt with accordingly when the time comes.
 
In before the GQP cheerleaders run in here to jeer about the thread title. Lake is the failed candidate for governor of AZ not CO.

I fully predict a high-profile position for her with the Trump campaign. With the inevitable end of Trump throwing her under the bus for something stupid that he did.
Or she could be wife #4. 🤷‍♂️
 
Gore, to this day, still makes comments that illudes to him thinking he won.
I think he won too. But he still gracefully conceded. Bush was not elected, he was selected by the conservative SC. No one will ever know what would have happened in Florida had the count been allowed to proceed.

Hillary conceded as well, 24 hours after the election. Abrams should have conceded. But I understand her complaint about Kemp.
 
She is running.
 
Nobody cares. What we care about is illegal attempts to overthrow elections. When you find one of those not named Trump, lemme know.
The people who rioted at the Capitol have been arrested. However, you did have a gunman show up to a Republican softball game to kill them all. A guy that was on his way to assassinate a SCOTUS member. You had people try and get faithless electors to overturn 2016. There were about 200 arrests on inauguration day in 2016.

Plenty to work off of here, despite your week attempts to excuse constant and historic Dem election denials.
 
You attempted to dismiss it with the same false equivalencies you folks always trot out.

The circumstances of the Bush/Gore election in 2020 bears no resemblance to Trump or Lake's false stolen election stories. Well, other than there was an election- and someone won.
Except it does bear resemblance. How do I know this? Because you didn't bring the goods. You said nothing more than "Nuh-uh!". Sorry, that only works with your base.
 
Your GOPs stole the century with the 2000 election.
Be proud of who and what you are.
^----election denier!
 
He may allude to it but that is a far cry from what Trump and now Lake say and do. They are very direct, loud and forceful about having the election stolen and being the real winners.
No it isn't.
 
You still don't answer the poster's question.

Do you think Kari Lake won for governor of AZ?

You instead jumped right over the poster's question to Al Gore in 2000 v Bush. Then to Stacy Abrams and Hillary.

So you tripped over your own attempt at fancy footwork.
Seems she didn't but the vote was so close that anything could tip the balance. There is a high likelihood that no matter what is looked at she lost.
 
I think he won too.
^--election denier!
But he still gracefully conceded. Bush was not elected, he was selected by the conservative SC. No one will ever know what would have happened in Florida had the count been allowed to proceed.
No he didn't. He was saying he had his election stolen over a decade later. That's not conceding, gracefully or not.
Hillary conceded as well, 24 hours after the election.
No, she didn't. She has incessantly gone on about how the elections were stolen from you because of Russian interference.
Abrams should have conceded. But I understand her complaint about Kemp.
Of course you understand. Of course you do.
 
The people who rioted at the Capitol have been arrested. However, you did have a gunman show up to a Republican softball game to kill them all. A guy that was on his way to assassinate a SCOTUS member. You had people try and get faithless electors to overturn 2016. There were about 200 arrests on inauguration day in 2016.

Plenty to work off of here, despite your week attempts to excuse constant and historic Dem election denials.
 
Seems she didn't but the vote was so close that anything could tip the balance. There is a high likelihood that no matter what is looked at she lost.
I must have missed your criticism of Lake's resumption of her loud and many election denials.

Then again maybe not because you haven't criticized Lake on this.

You must be okay too with Lake traveling to Maralago to physically team up with Trump in his election denials, to include for AZ governor where the D Kattie Hobbs is declared the winner and Lake refuses to concede. And as we are seeing Lake and Trump have the AZ Republican AG raising election denier hell in the state.
 
^--election denier!

No he didn't. He was saying he had his election stolen over a decade later. That's not conceding, gracefully or not.

No, she didn't. She has incessantly gone on about how the elections were stolen from you because of Russian interference.
In 2000 the 5 Supreme court members stopped the counting in FL once Their Guy Bush went ahead.

Then on the final decision for Bush, the 5 scotus members gave the court two votes in that election of the president, ie, one in their residence voting precinct and one on the court.

The 5 rightwing members of the court gave all the members two votes in the election of the Potus in 2000. So that's one supreme court member, two votes for Potus. That's quite the deal eh. You get to give yourself two votes for Potus and your vote is a deciding final one besides.

So this is an accusation (of corruption), not a denial.
 
I must have missed your criticism of Lake's resumption of her loud and many election denials.

Then again maybe not because you haven't criticized Lake on this.
Why would I criticize her? The vote counting was a joke. It took almost a week. If she had a D next to her name and the R held the position of election supervision ya'll would be losing your minds right now.
You must be okay too with Lake traveling to Maralago to physically team up with Trump in his election denials, to include for AZ governor where the D Kattie Hobbs is declared the winner and Lake refuses to concede. And as we are seeing Lake and Trump have the AZ Republican AG raising election denier hell in the state.
I don't give a shit if she visits Trump....but the funny part if your post here, is what you then posted next.
In 2000 the 5 Supreme court members stopped the counting in FL once Their Guy Bush went ahead.

Then on the final decision for Bush, the 5 scotus members gave the court two votes in that election of the president, ie, one in their residence voting precinct and one on the court.

The 5 rightwing members of the court gave all the members two votes in the election of the Potus in 2000. So that's one supreme court member, two votes for Potus. That's quite the deal eh. You get to give yourself two votes for Potus and your vote is a deciding final one besides.

So this is an accusation (of corruption), not a denial.
1. Bush was always ahead. Every recount grew his lead.
2. It's awfully convenient that YOUR case is the real stolen election but this one has no merit, and if someone does bring up issues with it, they are crazy. OK...yeah....you're totally intellectually consistent.
 
Why would I criticize her? The vote counting was a joke. It took almost a week. If she had a D next to her name and the R held the position of election supervision ya'll would be losing your minds right now.
The counting isn't the issue. You can't count then until you get them and AZ has very strict rules on signature verification for mail in ballots. When you allow day of ballot drops offs and follow strict verification rules it takes time. These rules are rules put in place by Republicans.
 
Back
Top Bottom