She talks into a transcriber thingy. Easier than using a manual stenographer I think.I'm a bit fascinated by the court reporter. How does she keep up?
She talks into a transcriber thingy. Easier than using a manual stenographer I think.
I wish I had one of those then I could keep up.I know. I just don't know how she keeps up.
So he changed his report because it didn't work to prove Read guilty.Defense finished their cross, got pretty much everything they needed. She admitted she looked for injuries consistent with a motor vehicle accident like bleeding, broken bones, bruising and found no evidence of a vehicle impact site or collision. On redirect Brennan asked a bunch of nonsense that was objected to and sustained by the judge.
Another thing, Trooper Keefe testified he attended the autopsy alone. However, a photograph was produced from the location of the autopsy at the time and it shows Keefe and former trooper Proctor. Scordi-Bello also testified there were two law enforcement officers present, not just one.
View attachment 67570188
And after the ME testimony, there was some dramatic arguments about motions. The Commonwealth previously had their expert Whiffen testify about phone data, and he proved O'Keefe was alive after their crash reconstructionist says the collision happened (12:31am). So their crash reconstructionist has a new report that changes the timeline of the Commonwealth again to comport with the previously conflicting information, based on Whiffin's testimony. Defense is fighting it's admission because they have based their defense around the time that has been in the report all trial. Judge hasn't ruled on that issue yet. The other motion argued was regarding ARCCA. Brennan recieved all the ARCCA reports on how they plan to rebut his expert crash reconstructionist. Now he says it's too much stuff, he doesn't have time for his expert to review all the rebuttal evidence so he thinks his expert should get to testify again at the end of the defense case. Judge hasn't ruled on that yet either.
Don't know who's up today yet. Maybe the Commonwealth crash reconstructionist.
Who are the other 2 people she ran over whose DNA was with O'Keefe's on the taillight? Where is O'Keefe's DNA on any of the pieces of taillight recovered from 34 Fairview? Not there. The unsealed blood evidence was also right next to the taillight for who knows how long. Oopsy DNA!So let me add this up, first we had Jen McCabe. Then we had two first responder's and now we have the Niece. Before that we had the Netflix documentary, Dateline and 48 Hours. I know I missed a few, all and more show Read confessing to backing up and hitting O'Keefe.
And now we Have DNA evidence. O'Keefe's DNA found on Read's passenger side Tail Light and the hair on the bumper is O'Keefe's as well.
What the Defense has going for it is a very young jury. Median age maybe 40 with at 5 or 6 under the age of 30. Today's youngsters are mostly critical of Government, they don't trust. Slick Willy new what he was doing when he helped concoct this jury.
What gets me about lawyers is this, even if Jackson thought Read was guilty, it wouldn't matter. Its the dark side of our legal and justice system. They sell they're souls, I personally could never be a lawyer, a prosecutor sure.
Brennan recieved all the ARCCA reports on how they plan to rebut his expert crash reconstructionist. Now he says it's too much stuff, he doesn't have time for his expert to review all the rebuttal evidence so he thinks his expert should get to testify again at the end of the defense case. Judge hasn't ruled on that yet either.