Kansas bans Sharia Law

[jet57]

Europe became Christian because of the Gospel. The Gospel went to Europe by God's direction as opposed to Asia.

Quantrill

Uh, okay . . . So historical fact doesn't enter in to it: go it.

 

[Quantrill]

Uh, okay . . . So historical fact doesn't enter in to it: go it.

No, historical facts enter into it.

Quantrill

 

[sangha]

No historical facts enter into it.

Quantrill

Fixed that for you

 

[Quantrill]

Fixed that for you

Really. So its allowed here to change what someone else said?

Not the kind of forum I would want to be part of.

Quantrill

 

[sangha]

Really. So its allowed here to change what someone else said?

Not the kind of forum I would want to be part of.

Quantrill

I didn't change what you said. I just fixed a typo

 

[Quantrill]

I didn't change what you said. I just fixed a typo

No, now your both a liar and a thief. You changed what I said to fit your argument.

Quantrill

 

[jet57]

No, historical facts enter into it.

Quantrill

You can't enter your theology as histroical fact in this instance. It wasn't until Constantine In in 325 A.D. declared the Christian religion the offical religion of Rome, that said Christianty accompanied the Roman empire from Constantinople into Europe. That's where Chritianity got its boost. Prior to that, it was as much shunned as were the Hebrews.

You can't speak of recorded historical fact from a Biblical perspective alone, when you do your assertions are not credible.

 

[jet57]

No, now your both a liar and a thief. You changed what I said to fit your argument.

Quantrill

No, he actually used yor own words against you, and it's quite funny: it tells a truth about your version of history

 

[Quantrill]

You can't enter your theology as histroical fact in this instance. It wasn't until Constantine In in 325 A.D. declared the Christian religion the offical religion of Rome, that said Christianty accompanied the Roman empire from Constantinople into Europe. That's where Chritianity got its boost. Prior to that, it was as much shunned as were the Hebrews.

You can't speak of recorded historical fact from a Biblical perspective alone, when you do your assertions are not credible.

How did Christianity get to Europe?

Quantrill

 

[Quantrill]

No, he actually used yor own words against you, and it's quite funny: it tells a truth about your version of history

So, you approve of changing anothers post to make it say what you want. And then call it 'truth'.

Quantrill

 

[blackjack50]

I think some of the regulations/rules in the NT, would be horrific if made into civil law.

Judaism too, for that matter.

Better than throwing rocks at rape victims? Oh wait. That is Sharia.

All that is really beside the point though.

Our court system is not to judge based upon laws that DO NOT EXIST within our Government. That would be certain Sharia laws. This is the United States of America. Not Iran.

 

[blackjack50]

You can't enter your theology as histroical fact in this instance. It wasn't until Constantine In in 325 A.D. declared the Christian religion the offical religion of Rome, that said Christianty accompanied the Roman empire from Constantinople into Europe. That's where Chritianity got its boost. Prior to that, it was as much shunned as were the Hebrews.

You can't speak of recorded historical fact from a Biblical perspective alone, when you do your assertions are not credible.

Are you saying that the Bible does NOT contain Historical fact?

 

[Deuce]

Better than throwing rocks at rape victims? Oh wait. That is Sharia.

All that is really beside the point though.

Our court system is not to judge based upon laws that DO NOT EXIST within our Government. That would be certain Sharia laws. This is the United States of America. Not Iran.

It doesn't and never has. US Courts are not under the impression that they are bound by Sharia laws. They will reference it when it's appropriate to the case, for instance when an ownership contract of a mosque stipulates that disputes will be arbitrated under Sharia law. It's a private contract and people can agree to whatever rules they like, so long as those rules don't violate any US law or the US constitution. In that case, it would absolutely be appropriate to reference Sharia law.

So, basically, your understanding of the situation is wrong. Referencing Sharia law does not mean a court is bound by Sharia law.

Are you saying that the Bible does NOT contain Historical fact?

While certain bits might be vaguely referencing something that actually happened, no, generally speaking the Bible does not contain historical fact. There was no worldwide flood and nobody made a sea split open so that it could be walked across.

 

[Manc Skipper]

Are you saying that the Bible does NOT contain Historical fact?

Unless it is supported by other sources, no. It's not a historical document. The Exodus, for example, left no traces in the Sinai peninsula from an alleged 40 years of wandering. There are no Egyptian records of a loss of all their slaves and a Pharaoh, either.