• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kamaga Agrees to Interview But Needs a Man with her.

Not after stiffing we the people for forty days. You're entitled to think it doesn't look weak, I'm entitled to think it does.
Then why did you say "she needs a Man with her" instead of just "she needs her running mate with her"? One of those is sexist, the other is not. You chose poorly.
 
Then why did you say "she needs a Man with her" instead of just "she needs her running mate with her"? One of those is sexist, the other is not. You chose poorly.

Because Democrats insist on identity politics. Don’t flip flop now.
 
It’s always refreshing to see how petrified conservative men are of vaginas. Not that ever really get to see any, anyways.
Unless they pay for the view!!!

Ahahahahahahahahahhahhhh....Conservative men.....knuckle dragging jackasses
 
Not after stiffing we the people for forty days. You're entitled to think it doesn't look weak, I'm entitled to think it does.
Except you don't really believe it. You're just trolling, as usual.

And all Presidential candidates do interviews with their Vice-Presidential running mates. This is nothing new.
 

Is she planning to bring Walz with her to the debate on the 10th? Does this seem like a strong confident woman who can't do a solo interview without a man next to her?
Did this ****in guy just try to mansplain being a strong woman? Passive aggressively, no less? Because passive aggressive mansplaining is a ****in feat, let me tell you
 
Except you don't really believe it. You're just trolling, as usual.

And all Presidential candidates do interviews with their Vice-Presidential running mates. This is nothing new.
....and most national interviews are pre recorded...and most release teaser clips....but all of a sudden these norms are conspiracies. I guess when it's all you got, it's all you got but it sure smells of fear.
 
Not after stiffing we the people for forty days. You're entitled to think it doesn't look weak, I'm entitled to think it does.
You're entitled to pretend that, yes, but the reason we all know you are lying is because Trump's white house went three hundred days without a press conference and you didn't say shit.
 
What a rude question. I think I'll take a pass.

Bye.
What was rude?
You stated "This "INTERVIEW" is a farce." before the interview has even taken place.

Not answering a question and taking a pass is what many Trump supporters do when asked to about their opinion.
Now, if you had stated "This "INTERVIEW" is a farce." after watching you might have a point.

Bye :giggle:
 
What was rude?
Asking me if I was projecting.
You stated "This "INTERVIEW" is a farce." before the interview has even taken place.
You left out context.

trixare4kids said:
So what? If she was a QUALIFIED candidate who wasn't afraid to give a LIVE interview ON HER OWN, I'd listen to what she has to say.

This "INTERVIEW" is a farce.
Not answering a question and taking a pass is what many Trump supporters do when asked to about their opinion.
You got it. Read it again. Next time, maybe you'll understand the context of my statement.
Now, if you had stated "This "INTERVIEW" is a farce." after watching you might have a point.
The interview is a farce for the reasons I statement above
 
And all Presidential candidates do interviews with their Vice-Presidential running mates. This is nothing new.
What's not new is going without an interview or a press conference after for 40 days after Biden announced his retirement. You and the press would go ape if Trump went 40 days without taking a single question.
 
Palin was the VP nominee not the presidential candidate. She did two solo interviews prior to doing an interview with McCain. She was ducking and hiding for while for the same reason Harris is. She didn't discipline herself or have the acumen to understand complex foreign affairs. But she was only the VP nominee. I think McCain went for novelty over substance with his pick.
No, the point is that you don't say McCain needed his hand held, why do you say Harris does?
Never mind, we know why.
 
What's not new is going without an interview or a press conference after for 40 days after Biden announced his retirement. You and the press would go ape if Trump went 40 days without taking a single question.
The Harris campaign seems to be doing pretty good without taking advice from you. Maybe they learned something from the last election, something about watching Trump lose.
Any day now they'll start spending money and then Trump is really going to unhinge.
 
What's not new is going without an interview or a press conference after for 40 days after Biden announced his retirement. You and the press would go ape if Trump went 40 days without taking a single question.
Trump does go 40 days without answering a question from a reporter. Fox News doesn't count. So what are you talking about???

And it doesn't matter if you "take" a question if all you do is lie....which is what Trump does.
 

Kamala Agrees to Interview But Needs a Man with her.

Remember when Donny agreed to an interview right before the 2016 RNCC, but Donny too needed a man with him.

Donald Trump-Mike Pence Interview on ’60 Minutes’: 6 Awkward Moments

The interview, which aired on the eve of the Republican National Convention, has been described as everything from "awkward" to "tense" to "excruciating."


You folks on the Right have got nothing!
 
You raise an excellent point. Whatever happened to I am woman, hear me roar? She's a fraud.
Y'all will have to fill me in on the pre-recorded, and no doubt heavily edited interview tomorrow morning. I won't be watching.
All of them are pre recorded.

This topic is stupid
 
Sure ...


Only dictators can assure equal outcomes.
I have something that explains it further if you'd like to see it. It even fills in some details you might not be aware of.
Not even Reason went as far as you in making up the idea of a dictatorship.

So false.
 
Can you just imagine the flustered on the right as they get ready for the interview. They will be in overdrive
 

Is she planning to bring Walz with her to the debate on the 10th? Does this seem like a strong confident woman who can't do a solo interview without a man next to her?

I don't have a problem with her bringing Walz, for I get a kick watching his face cringe when she speaks. The problem is her first interview is taped, surely will be edited to make them look brilliant. After all, it's CNN.

Look forward to all the virtue signaling coming from the left. I'll be wearing my boots....well, I always wear my boots.
 
Asking me if I was projecting.

You left out context.

trixare4kids said:
So what? If she was a QUALIFIED candidate who wasn't afraid to give a LIVE interview ON HER OWN, I'd listen to what she has to say.

This "INTERVIEW" is a farce.

You got it. Read it again. Next time, maybe you'll understand the context of my statement.

The interview is a farce for the reasons I statement above
How is she not qualified?
 

Is she planning to bring Walz with her to the debate on the 10th? Does this seem like a strong confident woman who can't do a solo interview without a man next to her?
This post shows your desperation, almost like you believe Harris will win.
 
Why don't you tell her to stand up for herself? You think Trump needs to take JD with him to do an interview?
I was trying to tell her , but she's too... too... what's the word,

She's too strong willed to listen to MAGA.
 
Back
Top Bottom