Isn't it rather ironic that Justin Trudeau banned keeping whales and dolphins in captivity even though he's extremely adamant about a woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion? Pro abortionists argue that a fetus is not a human being but just a blob of tissue, therefore it should be up to each individual woman to decide whether abortion is right or wrong. But whales and dolphins certainly aren't human beings, therefore shouldn't it be left to each individual to decide whether or not keeping them in captivity is right or wrong?
You seem to harbor a very binary view.
How about the vast majority of pro-choicers who argue for choice, while still against late term abortions except in the case of medical necessity, how about pro-choicers who urge people to seek alternatives wherever possible while still supporting the basic notion of it being a woman's right to choose, how about pro-choicers who will side with pro-life in cases where it is nothing more than abortions of convenience?
How about the middle of the road in pro-life who will allow abortions in the case of rape or incest, or where the life of the mother may be in jeopardy?
You don't seem to think any of those people exist, do you?
Of course not...we're all just satan worshipping America hating pedos who drink fetal tissue milkshakes from the
Abortion On Demand Drive Thru fast food joint on the corner, right?
But even after all that, pairing that with whales isn't apples vs oranges, it's wolves and tangerines.
It's wolves and tangerines because I bet you cannot mount a rational defense IN FAVOR OF keeping whales and dolphins in captivity.
Sell me on the idea, or did you really want to
just talk about ABORTION and just used Trudeau as a cover?
PS: Irony has nothing to do with it. What you posted is not irony.
A handy guide to distinguishing the notoriously slippery concept from its distant cousins coincidence, satire, parody, and paradox.
thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
