• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Clarence Thomas accepted several luxury trips paid for by GOP megadonor, ProPublica report finds (1 Viewer)

Wait, so you spent all that time arguing RGB was being influenced by gifts, but you don't think that was corruption?

And that illegally hiding those gifts isnor corruption?

Fascinating. I would apologize, but my assumption was of course very reasonable.

Again, stay slippery.
I don't see the quote. Lol
 
I don't see the quote.
Yes, because I just accepted -- in the post you just quoted -- that you weren't calling it corruption. Please pay attention, you are rudely wasting others' time.
 
Well then it's nice to have opinions

It's a fact. There is nothing about breaking the law in the definition of corruption.

So, yeah, you're cool with it.
 
Yes, because I just accepted -- in the post you just quoted -- that you weren't calling it corruption. Please pay attention, you are rudely wasting others' time.
Then you lied. And refuse to answer a direct question


So leave
 
I made it already.



You ran. Lol
No, you only asked a question. I asked you to not waste my time and make your point.

And you have refused, repeatedly. Because I think you value these extended tantrums over honest discussion.
 
No, you only asked a question. I asked you to not waste my time and make your point.

And you have refused, repeatedly. Because I think you value these extended tantrums over honest discussion.
It's a simple question



Look how you run. Lol


Now I refuse to allow you to answer it
 
Then you lied.
No, I made a mistake. And then took your (admittedly, very shaky) word that you don't think any of it is corruption.

That's how honest, rational adults operate.
 
No, I made a mistake. And then took your (admittedly, very shaky) word that you don't think any of it is corruption.

That's how honest, rational adults operate.
Some also answer direct questions. Lol
 
Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly stating your point.
Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly answering a question



The answer must be terrifying
 
So, let's summarize:

- RGB did the same thing! (Not really, she did not illegally hide her gifts)

- If it's illegal (it is), then you posters should arrest him! (We are not federal authorities)

- None of it is corruption!

And that's about it.
 
Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly answering a question



The answer must be terrifying
You know it isn't. This is very childish behavior, on your part.
 
You know it isn't. This is very childish behavior, on your part.
You know it is. This is very childish behavior, on your part.


Keep up the insults



It's your concession
 
Rbg did it for decades. 14 trips in one year.....a record
Yeah, you're analysis is absolutely brilliant!!!

RBG had 14 trips funded by sponsors, such as universities and non-profits fully disclosed, which is the same thing as a $500,000 luxury trip with a big donor and not disclosed!

Do you have a newsletter where we can get more of this brilliant stuff?
It's not partisan
Not sure if "it" is partisan, but your argument is about as dumb as they get.
You should feel embarrassed
For recognizing the difference between a university paying the travel for a justice to a conference where they're speaking and dozens of luxury trip with private planes and a massive yacht that isn't disclosed?
 
Yeah, you're analysis is absolutely brilliant!!!

RBG had 14 trips funded by sponsors, such as universities and non-profits fully disclosed, which is the same thing as a $500,000 luxury trip with a big donor and not disclosed!

Do you have a newsletter where we can get more of this brilliant stuff?

Not sure if "it" is partisan, but your argument is about as dumb as they get.

For recognizing the difference between a university paying the travel for a justice to a conference where they're speaking and dozens of luxury trip with private planes and a massive yacht that isn't disclosed?
It was actually a Israeli billionaire that paid for a trip..... and she had previously ruled on his case
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom