- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,848
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Or yours it seemsView attachment 67443723
but then, i don't have your ability to predict the future
Or yours it seemsView attachment 67443723
but then, i don't have your ability to predict the future
Stop throwing a tantrum and make your point.Never ask me a question
I don't see the quote. LolWait, so you spent all that time arguing RGB was being influenced by gifts, but you don't think that was corruption?
And that illegally hiding those gifts isnor corruption?
Fascinating. I would apologize, but my assumption was of course very reasonable.
Again, stay slippery.
I made it already.Stop throwing a tantrum and make your point.
Yes, because I just accepted -- in the post you just quoted -- that you weren't calling it corruption. Please pay attention, you are rudely wasting others' time.I don't see the quote.
Well then it's nice to have opinions
Then you lied. And refuse to answer a direct questionYes, because I just accepted -- in the post you just quoted -- that you weren't calling it corruption. Please pay attention, you are rudely wasting others' time.
No, you only asked a question. I asked you to not waste my time and make your point.I made it already.
You ran. Lol
Well that's nice. LolIt's a fact. There is othing about breaking the law in the definition of corruption.
It's a simple questionNo, you only asked a question. I asked you to not waste my time and make your point.
And you have refused, repeatedly. Because I think you value these extended tantrums over honest discussion.
No, I made a mistake. And then took your (admittedly, very shaky) word that you don't think any of it is corruption.Then you lied.
Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly stating your point.It's a simple question
Some also answer direct questions. LolNo, I made a mistake. And then took your (admittedly, very shaky) word that you don't think any of it is corruption.
That's how honest, rational adults operate.
Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly answering a questionLook how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly stating your point.
Well that's nice. Lol
Well.....in your opinion. LolIt's nice that you're cool with corruption.
You know it isn't. This is very childish behavior, on your part.Look how you throw a 3 page tantrum to avoid clearly answering a question
The answer must be terrifying
You know it is. This is very childish behavior, on your part.You know it isn't. This is very childish behavior, on your part.
Well.....in your opinion. Lol
In your opinionBy its definition.
Yeah, you're analysis is absolutely brilliant!!!Rbg did it for decades. 14 trips in one year.....a record
Not sure if "it" is partisan, but your argument is about as dumb as they get.It's not partisan
For recognizing the difference between a university paying the travel for a justice to a conference where they're speaking and dozens of luxury trip with private planes and a massive yacht that isn't disclosed?You should feel embarrassed
It was actually a Israeli billionaire that paid for a trip..... and she had previously ruled on his caseYeah, you're analysis is absolutely brilliant!!!
RBG had 14 trips funded by sponsors, such as universities and non-profits fully disclosed, which is the same thing as a $500,000 luxury trip with a big donor and not disclosed!
Do you have a newsletter where we can get more of this brilliant stuff?
Not sure if "it" is partisan, but your argument is about as dumb as they get.
For recognizing the difference between a university paying the travel for a justice to a conference where they're speaking and dozens of luxury trip with private planes and a massive yacht that isn't disclosed?
In your opinion
Or learn how to spell it. LolIncorrect. I didn't write the dictiinary