We saw that at the recently concluded convention, which reminded anybody with a sense of history of the Nuremburg rallies of the 1930's. Same fanaticism, same cult like devotion to their God.
I think Hillary/Kaine is done, doa.
It's over.
Just my opinion, but I really do.
Yeah...Yeah....Yeah
I keep hearing the same BS by other paranoids like yourself.
Really? ..................Nuremberg rallies? Pretty stupid analogy..
You are just the most recent proof of what I stated to begin with.
No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
Please don't make Nazi comparisons. You just lose credibility in doing so.
I preferred the chants to throw her in jail, they're more suitable to her crimes.Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
Please don't lecture me. You don't have the education or life experience to do so. And maintaining credibility with you is not real high on my list of priorities.
Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
Please don't lecture me. You don't have the education or life experience to do so. And maintaining credibility with you is not real high on my list of priorities.
Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Follow
RevoltPolitic
@RevoltPolitic
HAPPENING NOW: Sanders supporters, including delegates, are locked out of the DNC rules committee AND have been kicked out of the building.
Not sure of the truthiness of this.
No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Considering that it was Russian hackers that hacked the DNC, I think Putin is trying to make trump the winner.
No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
What the OP quoted were emails that were released months ago. They are not new revelations or a game changer because they've already been dissected, chewed up and spit out by the media.
From the OP....
Those stones have already been turned over by congress and the FBI and there is no there...there.
I think I would respect Assange a lot more if he didn't show his political bias. The timing of this release just before the DNC convention is too politically obvious to be believed except by the most gullible and politically naïve.
^^ This.
Read the laws instead of taking someone's word for it. I'd like to think you're someone who thinks for themselves instead of taking someone's word for it because. Just because. I just showed you every law she broke based on Comey's information. This means that Comey has unintentionally testified against her. He also never specifically said she broke no laws. If I recall correctly, and I'm fairly certain I do, all he said was that using a private server did not break the law, not that what she did with it didn't break the law.
I have read the laws and I agree with Comey...she did not commit a crime.
In this country a prosecutor has to prove Mens rea (intent) and Actus reum (commited) to indict for a crime. The FBI did not find either in Clintons case.
:shock:
Wait a minute. Are you implying you are working with Julian Assange?
Considering that it was Russian hackers that hacked the DNC, I think Putin is trying to make trump the winner.
Then what purpose does lying serve? Usually it serves to cover up something that someone knows they did wrong. I'm also fairly certain that dismantling your server, destroying evidence, and the fact that she waited a full two years before destroying said evidence(During an investigation), and use of multiple servers and devices shows pretty clear intent.I have read the laws and I agree with Comey...she did not commit a crime.
In this country a prosecutor has to prove Mens rea (intent) and Actus reum (commited) to indict for a crime. The FBI did not find either in Clintons case.
This was covered in Comey's congressional hearings. She didn't request a "classification" be stripped off so that classified information could be sent without designation. There is a term for removing classified information in order to resend the rest of the document, the non-classified portion, to a non-secure source, and that is what she requested. Comey said this is common practice and has always been common practice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?