- Joined
- Jun 28, 2013
- Messages
- 1,681
- Reaction score
- 1,219
- Location
- Rhode Island
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
He wasn't even on the ticket when Bernie endorsed her. And certainly not when the convention is still in progress. I doubt the DNC even wants Kaine at the top of the ticket.I believe that Kaine would become the presidential nominee, since Bernie has already endorsed Hilliary.
Julian Assange is a scumbag. I'd take anything he says with a grain of salt.
Considering the timing, I would take what he is say with all the salt in the Dead Sea.
He wasn't even on the ticket when Bernie endorsed her. And certainly not when the convention is still in progress. I doubt the DNC even wants Kaine at the top of the ticket.
Is he still hiding in that one embassy to avoid being prosecuted for the rape(s)?
Hello, Pumpkin Row. :2wave:
Could you list it for us, then?
These are different from what was already released.
From what I understand.
Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation. He also reminded ITV’s Robert Peston that previously released emails contained one damning piece of communication from Clinton, instructing a staffer to remove the classification settings from an official State Department communication and send it through a “nonsecure” channel. Assange then pointed out that the Obama administration has previously prosecuted numerous whistleblowers for violating the government’s procedures for handling classified documents.
What the OP quoted were emails that were released months ago. They are not new revelations or a game changer because they've already been dissected, chewed up and spit out by the media.
From the OP....
Those stones have already been turned over by congress and the FBI and there is no there...there.
I think I would respect Assange a lot more if he didn't show his political bias. The timing of this release just before the DNC convention is too politically obvious to be believed except by the most gullible and politically naïve.
Bernie should not accept the nomination like this. Being handed the nomination by a bunch of opportunistic hackers would make sander's presidential campagin without merit.
Heck if he does become the nominee like this, I will forever call him the Russian candidate.
Yes, but I don't think it's for the "rapes". I don't know about any raping to begin with.
:shock:
Wait a minute. Are you implying you are working with Julian Assange?
I dunno, ****s gotten a bit crazy.
Well, according to his claims, he says he has an email of her requesting classification to be stripped off of a document so it could be sent to her. And, no, they didn't get all of her emails. Comey made this clear.
Does anyone think that Obama or Lynch will actually do their jobs? That's funny.
Kool Aid liberals wouldn't care what information Assange tosses out there, even if it actually turns out to be factual.
They are too preoccupied with their own hypocrisy, and tearing down everyone who doesn't think like they do.
Progressives are only "progressive" in their own minds, and the proof is often exhibited on here with their own vitriol when discussing conservatives.
Opposing views to a liberal/progressive are like kryptonite to Superman.
It's election season....time to shout at clouds.
False, I can list at least five laws she broke off the top of my head, just from the information the FBI has given us.
DNC rules committee allegedly has lock out Bernie delegates and they're supposedly talking about banning super delegates.
What I've seen written.
Many have said, if she is going to get indicted, it won't be over emails or benghazi. It will be something Clinton Foundation related. It feels like those times you imagine winning the lottery and what you would do with the money, but I can't help but play the "What if?" game. What if....something came out that made her sure to lose the general election?
Well, after having digested the previous email dump and stewed on the apparent fact that the DNC machine, contrary to it's own rules, was pulling for Shillary from the very beginning and running on all 8 cylinders while doing it. A lot of people are considering that maybe he would have won a fair contest. Now we get another dump friday, with more showing how they came up with attack strategies, at a time they were publicly demanding he back of his attacks and keep it civil in the party. Practically directing the media. If she is indicted or excluded in the next week, the DNC will have no choice but Bernie. Being so last minute, and with all that we've seen these last few weeks suggesting he either should have either lost a nail biter or won, the DNC won't have a chance to play Biden, or Bloomberg. Anyone the DNC reaches for who isn't Bernie will be seen as a puppet for a corrupt establishment, and Bernie would be perfectly justified in running 3rd party and have very good odds on election day. The timing can't be coincidental, and if I held the cards Assange claims he has next to the ones he's played already, I'd play them out the same way if I didn't want her as POTUS.
Here's for hoping!
Now that's new news..I'd like to see that. Do you have a link?
Read the laws instead of taking someone's word for it. I'd like to think you're someone who thinks for themselves instead of taking someone's word for it because. Just because. I just showed you every law she broke based on Comey's information. This means that Comey has unintentionally testified against her. He also never specifically said she broke no laws. If I recall correctly, and I'm fairly certain I do, all he said was that using a private server did not break the law, not that what she did with it didn't break the law.Well, I can quote the Director of the FBI who said she did not commit an indictable offense and that "no reasonable prosecutor" would indict her based on the laws you have in your head.
You'd have to be extremely unreasonable to indict Hillary.
Don't try think...it's not working out for you.
Unlike you right wing types, who are so tolerant and understanding of opposing ideas.:lamo
We saw that at the recently concluded convention, which reminded anybody with a sense of history of the Nuremburg rallies of the 1930's. Same fanaticism, same cult like devotion to their God.
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Well, I am not a Hillary supporter and I think that had she been anyone else she would have been indicted on the evidence already made public.
Having said that, I prefer to wait and see what Mr. Assange's evidence actually is. To be honest, whatever it is I doubt any action will be taken against her at this point in the campaign.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?