- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 38,591
- Reaction score
- 18,579
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton.
In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking documents that will provide “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation. He also reminded ITV’s Robert Peston that previously released emails contained one damning piece of communication from Clinton, instructing a staffer to remove the classification settings from an official State Department communication and send it through a “nonsecure” channel. Assange then pointed out that the Obama administration has previously prosecuted numerous whistleblowers for violating the government’s procedures for handling classified documents.
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Well, I am not a Hillary supporter and I think that had she been anyone else she would have been indicted on the evidence already made public.
Having said that, I prefer to wait and see what Mr. Assange's evidence is. To be honest, whatever it is I doubt any action will be taken against her at this point in the campaign season.
looks like he's trying to sink her before the convention so that they, in theory, have to vote Sanders. i tend to doubt that will happen, though.
Then the indictment would be "celebrity hunting" because no one has ever been indicted for "extreme carelessness" without intent or committing a crime. So to indict her would be to treat Hillary different than everyone else...but not quite the way you think.
Now, I am not a fan of puppeteers and conspiracy theory's, but why can't I shake the nagging fear that somebody is pulling Assanges strings?
Who do you think is pulling Assanges' strings? Got any ideas?
Who do you think is pulling Assanges' strings? Got any ideas?
Wrong. If they actually do have the email they claim then they have proof that her violations were done knowingly. Maybe you should reread the the OP.
James Franco?
The emails that Assange releasing have already been released to the public by the State Department months ago. So what is new in those emails that we didn't already know?
Vladimir Putin.
He seems to be interested in the DNC for some reason.
And if action is taken, she'll be pardoned by our failure president.Well, I am not a Hillary supporter and I think that had she been anyone else she would have been indicted on the evidence already made public.
Having said that, I prefer to wait and see what Mr. Assange's evidence actually is. To be honest, whatever it is I doubt any action will be taken against her at this point in the campaign.
The emails that Assange is releasing were released to the public by the State Department months ago. So what is new in those emails that we didn't already know?
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
I've heard something similar to that before, but I don't know if it's true or not.
False, I can list at least five laws she broke off the top of my head, just from the information the FBI has given us.Then the indictment would be "celebrity hunting" because no one has ever been indicted for "extreme carelessness" without intent or committing a crime. So to indict her would be to treat Hillary different than everyone else...but not quite the way you think.
False, I can list at least five laws she broke off the top of my head, just from the information the FBI has given us.
Many have said, if she is going to get indicted, it won't be over emails or benghazi. It will be something Clinton Foundation related. It feels like those times you imagine winning the lottery and what you would do with the money, but I can't help but play the "What if?" game. What if....something came out that made her sure to lose the general election?
Well, after having digested the previous email dump and stewed on the apparent fact that the DNC machine, contrary to it's own rules, was pulling for Shillary from the very beginning and running on all 8 cylinders while doing it. A lot of people are considering that maybe he would have won a fair contest. Now we get another dump friday, with more showing how they came up with attack strategies, at a time they were publicly demanding he back of his attacks and keep it civil in the party. Practically directing the media. If she is indicted or excluded in the next week, the DNC will have no choice but Bernie. Being so last minute, and with all that we've these last few weeks suggesting he either should have either lost a nail biter or won, the DNC won't have a chance to play Biden, or Bloomberg. Anyone the DNC reaches for who isn't Bernie will be seen as a puppet for a corrupt establishment, and Bernie would be perfectly justified in running 3rd party and have very good odds on election day. The timing can't be coincidental, and if I held the cards Assange claims he has next to the ones he's played already, I'd play them out the same way if I didn't want her as POTUS.
Here's for hoping!
The emails that Assange is releasing were released to the public by the State Department months ago. So what is new in those emails that we didn't already know?
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs
Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?