• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge targeted by Trump is assigned to Signalgate lawsuit

The lawsuit brought by left leaning watchdog group, American Oversight:
The Hill

Flashback to 2017, when
@TheAtlantic
called Signal “the gold standard of encrypted messaging” — and admitted it was used by Obama and Hillary Clinton staffers.
 
Given his decisions it actually is, since he's found in favor of Trump cases in the past and was the judge who ordered the release of Hillary Clinton's documents the FBI found, and he gave lenient punishments for the J6 rioters. Donnie Boy's rants and calling him a "radical judge" or whatever are just deflections because the message is always that anyone standing in his way needs to be demonized. That works fine for the Donnie Boy parrots, but less so for everyone else.
 
trixare4kids said:
The lawsuit brought by left leaning watchdog group, American Oversight:

The Hill
Click to expand...
As is their right to do, and as conservative groups have done in the past for policies/actions they didn't like.

trixare4kids said:
Flashback to 2017, when
@TheAtlantic
called Signal “the gold standard of encrypted messaging” — and admitted it was used by Obama and Hillary Clinton staffers.
Click to expand...
Remind us again when a reporter was added to any of these communications? Was there a Pentagon warning against using those apps back then? Apps like these should never be allowed for sensitive government communications, and the threat now is even greater than it was in the Obama years.
 
trixare4kids said:
Jeffrey Goldberg is the desperate Democrats useful idiot.

Click to expand...
Not really, since he isn't the one whose spinning his wheels trying to change the narrative.


The useful parroting of a laughable narrative by the administration is far more entertaining.
 
ElChupacabra said:
Not really, since he isn't the one whose spinning his wheels trying to change the narrative.


The useful parroting of a laughable narrative by the administration is far more entertaining.
Click to expand...
You should ignore her.
 
Aren’t cabinet officials provided with government issued secure comms?
 
Fast forward eight years…..

NSA warned of vulnerabilities in Signal app a month before Houthi strike chat

The National Security Agency sent a bulletin in February warning of Russian hackers trying to access encrypted conversations on Signal.
www.cbsnews.com
 
not relevant to ignoring the DOD directive not to use it in this case.
 
Artymoon said:
For real. And if anyone thinks this was a random assignment they're smoking something.
Click to expand...
Agreed. There appears to be nothing at all random about this.
 

From this morning: The Democrats shit show​

Wednesday, March 26​


Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are among officials appearing before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss global threats to the U.S. The hearing was scheduled before The Atlantic’s revelations.
“I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information,” Ratcliffe said. “It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information.”​
 
So now it’s “sensitive?” Yesterday it was something else. Today Gabbard’s memory is refreshed.
 

Again, there was no classified information shared in the chat and it's unfortunate for the country that a partisan Democrat political hack named Jeffrey Goldberg made a bigger deal out of this than necessary. I don't even see merit in the lawsuit.
It's frivolous to the nth degree! The Democrats once again prove why their approval numbers are historically lower than ever. Read your article. It said it was okay for chats where classified information is not shared.

You have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
Only a political hack would publish messages from a group chat they knew they didn't belong on.
He's the Democrats' biggest hero.
 
Trump is the one who is "cutting Congress out of the equation entirely" with his grab of the power of the purse.
 
trixare4kids said:
Only a political hack would publish messages from a group chat they knew they didn't belong on.
He's the Democrats' biggest hero.
Click to expand...
Complain to trump and his minions. THEY are the ones who sent the group chat to an editor/reporter at an MSM.

THEY didn't take the time to check this sort of significant detail.....remember? Blame THEM.
 
The real problem for our nation's national security is how the hell a well-known anti-Trump political hack's name was added to a high-level government group chat. Who did this? Was this done during the Biden administration as an attempt to set Trump's people up? I put nothing past the slimy Democrats. Nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…