Re: Judge strikes down Wisconsin gay marriage ban[W:287]
1.)There is a "slippery slope" LAW IS by its very nature a SERIES of slippery slopes as all past law, and future law is based on PRECEDENT
2.) assuming you are a liberal this should be a very foreign idea to you.
3.)It is that past laws and present laws effect FUTURE laws in the same way that past decisions by SCOTUS are typically cited in current decisions by SCOTUS.
4.) And to single out the word "Bestiality" out of the other examples such as "polygamy" and the whole foot mannequin thing...
5.)anyways I find it rather disturbing that you try to discredit my opinion with by saying that no "educated or honest person" could take it seriously.
6.)No my good sir just no Progressive LibDems will take me seriously (Not that I care what the LibDems think).
7.)Equal treatment under different names is still equal treatment.
8.) If we are going to argue for semantics purposes and semantics solely than it is not an arguement worth having.
9.) IF the LGBT wishes to throw my proposal away due to "semantics" then so be it it simply prooves how rigged, furvent, and blind progressive libdems of the LGBT truely are.
10.) Hopefully more people in the LGBT will realize that conservatives are simply concerned about the precedent this sets for future lawmakers and future activist groups.
1.) im so happy you mentioned PRECEDENCE and bolded it like it supports your failed and factually wrong claim when its exactly what proves your statement wrong..
if you think your factually wrong statement is true simply provide the precedent that can be used that is solely related to SSM to support beaslitalty.
2.) you assume wrong and this deflection further exposes how theres no accurate, logical, factual or legality based support for your claim
3.) see #1 this is what makes your statement wrong it doesnt support it
4.) use any one you want, it doesnt matter they will all fail based on the examples you provided. There is ZERO precedence that can be taken solely from Equal rights/SSM that lends itself to polgamy, beasitly or manniguins. Try it will be fun.
5.) again its not me that discredited the opinions and factually false statments you made its facts, laws rights, reality, legality and precedence that all do that. They all disagree with your false claim.
6.) another failed deflection, my statement stands nobody educated, honest and objective will ever take the comparison of equal rights to beastality seriously etc because it would be mentally retarded to actually thing those comparisons are parallel when they are not analogous and they are inane.
7.) factually false has history, law and rights prove and has was proven in post #293 which you totally dodged because it destroyed your failed statement.
8.) i agree your argument is worthless since facts, history, law, rights, precedence all easily defeat it
9.)the LBGT and all americans that support equal rights laugh and through it away because it is factually not equal which as already been proven and is further proven by the questions you dodge.
10.) please dont group your views with all conservatives millions of them disagree with you and support equal rights.
facts win again
again let us know when you have any facts that support your failed claims.