That is a nice story. First off, I voted for Jo, not Joe. I have voted for one Dem for POTUS in my lifetime and that was almost 30 years ago.
ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your lifesecond, while it probably helps you sleep at night to tell yourself that about why your god lost, the fact of the matter is that more than 58 judges, 3 state supreme courts and the US supreme court all disagree with you.
I think your shift key is stickyYes. You've argued that before. No one is buying it.
ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life
My fingers get ahead of themselves sometimesI think your shift key is sticky
Yes. You've argued that before. No one is buying it.
Can you clarify? What exactly does voter suppression mean to each group?Nope. "Voter suppression" means something entirely different to the Democrats that it does to every patriotic American.
ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life
To patriotic American is means efforts to stop people from legally voting.Can you clarify? What exactly does voter suppression mean to each group?
Perhaps you should go to another thread to vent your Trump hate.You should get out more, this is not the only case to allege illegal votes since the last election.
There’s always suggestions of wide spread illegal voting on the right but never any proof.To patriotic American is means efforts to stop people from legally voting.
To Democrats it means any efforts to ensure only legal votes are counted - VOter ID, signature verification, requesting mail-in ballots, efforts to ensure integrity of registration rolls, ballot challenges...
There’s always suggestions of wide spread illegal voting on the right but never any proof.
So why are Republican’s so insistent on solving a problem that doesn’t exist while making it even more annoying and cumbersome to vote?
Perhaps you should go to another thread to vent your Trump hate.
How sadly pathetic that anyone can be so duped into believing that the election was fraudulent! It means that you do not believe the DOJ, DHS, the Attorney General, CISA, the GOP Governors and Secretaries of States in Georgia et al BUT you do believe all the debunked conspiracy theories that sore losers cling to! It's to the point that no matter how many times courts, facts and recounts are done you'll never accept the results. Why? Because Trump to you that the election was stolen from him? You nor anyone else has shown any proof/evidence to dispute the results yet you relentlessly post made up shit that is so easy to disprove. We can disprove everything you claim yet YOU can't prove anything that you claim.And we realize that the only way you DEmocrats can win is with illegal votes - the point of the Counties' action. Sad.
ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life
Georgia. Senate run offs. Focus. Lose the hateHAHA! You need to look in the mirror. The only people here who have allowed Trump to "overtake" their lives are Trump supporters. What the rest of us have done is vote him out of office and it wasn't close. Trump's the only President to have never won the popular vote and he's relegated to being a sad, one-term President who history will remember as the worst President in American history. BYE DON!
A) They didn’t vote in this election. It’s a voter role purge and pre-emptive not as a result of out of state people voting.These people filed change of address forms stating that they moved out of Georgia. Then they voted in this election. You don't think this is a problem? You don't think it's worth investigating whether they voted illegally? Really? How is this making it "more annoying and cumbersome to vote?"
It is not a purge. No one is touching the registration rolls. The Counties were allowing them to vote, but only provisional ballots. Stacy's sister said nope. Read the whole story not just the propaganda from Stacy and Mark "Steele Dossier" EliasA) They didn’t vote in this election. It’s a voter role purge and pre-emptive not as a result of out of state people voting.
B) The list is like 4k names.
C) Purging voter roles with 90 days of a Fed election with zero notice is not allowed.
I read it from politico..what “non-propaganda” site are you referring to?It is not a purge. No one is touching the registration rolls. The Counties were allowing them to vote, but only provisional ballots. Stacy's sister said nope. Read the whole story not just the propaganda from Stacy and Mark "Steele Dossier" Elias
The AJC article in the OPI read it from politico..what “non-propaganda” site are you referring to?
These people filed change of address forms stating that they moved out of Georgia. Then they voted in this election. You don't think this is a problem? You don't think it's worth investigating whether they voted illegally?
Sorry, I don't share your vitriol. I simple said she should of recused herself.Ironically, the judge you hate so much said it is worth investigating, but that the people cannot be removed until such time as it is investigated.
She said the change of address form alone is not enough, which seems pretty logical to me
Any appearance of impropriety or favoritism is to be avoided so as to prevent accusations of bias and favoritism. Its called ethics.Other than a relationship, what evidence do you have that there is any bias or impartiality problems?
Yeah, but it's still not as cool as having a brother that is the governor of the state that determines whether or not you get elected.
Not on the surface, no. I disagree with the judge not recusing herself. The optics are piss poor.
If the intent is to issue a fair ruling that is in accordance with the law, then surely a different judge could have done the same thing and all of this could have been avoided.
If Republicans put the energy they expend in suppressing/depressing the votes of Americans into actually helping Americans instead, they then might have one hell of a political party.
And who gets to make that call? The judge. If it appears the judge has acted unethically, the state judicial commission (or whatever GA calls it) will call a hearing and determine if there has been an ethical violation. If there was, the judge will pay.Any appearance of impropriety or favoritism is to be avoided so as to prevent accusations of bias and favoritism. Its called ethics.
Don't even try to play the orange man bad card, it doesn't alleviate ethical decisions on the part of judges.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?