- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 59,432
- Reaction score
- 39,011
- Location
- Best Coast Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentialsCNN's legal challenge came in response to the Trump administration's decision last week to yank Acosta's "hard pass," which gave him access to the White House grounds, after Acosta clashed with the president at a news conference earlier that day.
In the process, the suit threw into stark relief Trump's increasingly fraught relationship with many mainstream media outlets, which he regularly decries as "fake news" and "the enemy of the people."
In their lawsuit, the network said the White House’s actions violated the network and Acosta’s First and Fifth Amendment rights to free speech and due process. CNN argued Trump stripped Acosta of his access because of the questions he posed to the president; and that the White House failed to follow federal regulations dictating press-pass access.
In his decision, Judge Kelly said that under previous precedent set by a 1977 ruling, the White House “must provide due process if they are to revoke Mr. Acosta’s hard pass.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
How many times do you think Acosta will be called upon in the future?
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
"The white house can pull whosoever's pass they want for any reason
but depending on why, it also opens them up for praise or criticisms.
In this case...... criticisms and much deserved criticisms based on trumps whack job triggered melt down. The best part is they know it hence the dishonest exaggerations and usage of doctored videos.
Regardless though i dont see how this is a legal matter unless theres some precedence out there i dont know about...seems like a waste of time.... . guess we'll see
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
A victory for free speech.
And the toddler-in-chief will have his usual mental breakdown.
Gonna be a rough week for him. :lamo
How many times do you think Acosta will be called upon in the future?
Process:
Step 1: You are asked to stop asking questions.
Step 2: You refuse to turn over microphone to WH staff
Step 3: You make contact with WH staff
Step 4: Your pass is suspended until all your advertisers pay their employees $15/hr (or more).
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
0. also this is a stay in the initial one this isn't a final ruling.
sure he can sit there, but trump can ignore him.
and if he wants to be belligerent during the conferences he can be asked to leave.
that is the better way to take care of acosta.
PS this isn't over this is simply a temporarly order delay.
the real case still has to go through.
While the judge temporarily restored Acosta's press badge, later hearings could determine whether Acosta's First Amendment rights were violated.
The only belligerent one is el trumpo. Acosta was merely doing his job, yeah maybe he could have given back the mic quicker but he wasn’t being “belligerent”, he was asking questions (again, that’s his job) which trump neglected to answer and chose to be disgustingly rude, condescending and took personal jabs at Acosta and others in lieu of answering those questions. Good for Acosta for fighting back against the tyrant in chief and the Judge made the right call here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
Looks like it ain't over until the fat lady sings...
A federal judge on Friday grants CNN’s request for a court order that would temporarily reinstate network correspondent Jim Acosta’s White House press pass.
Even if the ruling becomes permanent down the road, there is no ruling that says the WH must answer Acosta's bait questions.
The only belligerent one is el trumpo. Acosta was merely doing his job, yeah maybe he could have given back the mic quicker but he wasn’t being “belligerent”, he was asking questions (again, that’s his job) which trump neglected to answer and chose to be disgustingly rude, condescending and took personal jabs at Acosta and others in lieu of answering those questions. Good for Acosta for fighting back against the tyrant in chief and the Judge made the right call here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/16/jud...orter-jim-acostas-white-house-press-pass.html
Now it is in the WH backyard to devise a process for removing press credentials
Judge criticized WH for their ever changing stories
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cnn-wins-legal-battle-against-trump-over-acostas-press-access
Looks like it ain't over until the fat lady sings...
A federal judge on Friday grants CNN’s request for a court order that would temporarily reinstate network correspondent Jim Acosta’s White House press pass.
Even if the ruling becomes permanent down the road, there is no ruling that says the WH must answer Acosta's bait questions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?