• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Hands Gavin Newsom Control of National Guard in Blow to Trump

RaleBulgarian said:
Black’s Law is a much better reference for legal definitions.

Rebellion​

Definition and Citations:​

“Deliberate, organized resistance, by force and arms, to the laws or operations of the government …”
Click to expand...
I did a republic for government is the people and what the people vote for Donald Trump because they want him to remove illegal aliens that commit criminal Acts a judge saying no you can't be Commander in Chief over the national guard is rebelling.


RaleBulgarian said:
thelawdictionary.org

REBELLION Definition & Meaning - Black's Law Dictionary

Find the legal definition of REBELLION from Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition. Deliberate, organized resistance, by force and arms, to the laws or operations of the government, committed by a subject See Hubbard v. Harnden Exp. Co.,...
thelawdictionary.org thelawdictionary.org

Then there’s federal law, which should be familiar to all that witnessed the historic attack on Congress by deranged, violent Traitor Trump cultists.

§2383. Rebellion or insurrection​

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

IF January 6th, 2021 wasn’t a “rebellion”, no way the protests in CA are.

😄 Horse shit.

🤣 More idiotic horse shit!

🤣 Even more horse shit!

Judge Breyer’s order was not overturned.

The Traitor Trump administration was granted an “administrative stay”.
Click to expand...
 
RaleBulgarian said:
“In an order following an afternoon hearing, Breyer concluded that "Defendants are temporarily ENJOINED from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles. Defendants are DIRECTED to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom."

In the case, Trump is the defendant and Newsom is the plaintiff.”

“Newsom wrote on X on Thursday:"BREAKING: The court just confirmed what we all know — the military belongs on the battlefield, not on our city streets. This win is not just for California, but the nation. It's a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day. End the illegal militarization of Los Angeles now, @realDonaldTrump. History is watching."


🤣
Click to expand...
Newsom is desperate to maintain his leadership of the opposition against Trump. He is actively campaigning to stay in the news so he can launch his presidential campaign next year.
 
CLAX1911 said:
They don't seem to understand that the national guard is national in the answer to the Commander in Chief for those courts seeking deploy it that's his job.
Click to expand...
"The National Guard is a state-based military force"

The president is only allowed to deploy the guard in certain, very limited, curcumstances.

Generally speaking it is the gonernors job, not the presidents, to deploy the guard.
 
NolanVoyd said:
"The National Guard is a state-based military force"
Click to expand...
If Governor dick cheese I had not been fingering his starfish while la descended into chaos he would be humiliated by his lack of action.
NolanVoyd said:
The president is only allowed to deploy the guard in certain, very limited, curcumstances.
Click to expand...
Like seditious piece of shit governor in seditious piece of shit mayor letting terrorists destroy the city.
NolanVoyd said:
Generally speaking it is the gonernors job,
Click to expand...
World Governor horseshit for brains didn't do that
NolanVoyd said:
not the presidents, to deploy the guard.
Click to expand...
And in the case of an incompetent corrupt piece of shit worthless scumbag governor saying "**** you L A I hope you all burned to death" the president needs to act.

If governor's scumbag didn't want to be humiliated he should have been such a corrupt bag of asses. I think you should face charges of sedition
 
CLAX1911 said:
Governor dick cheese I

seditious piece of shit governor in seditious piece of shit mayor

World Governor horseshit for brains

incompetent corrupt piece of shit worthless scumbag governor

governor's scumbag
Click to expand...
Wow. Childish name calling and no evidence to back up your point.

If you think you can have an adult conversation someday get back to me.
 
AZRWinger said:
The District court judge granted the plaintiffs request to second guess the President’s decision to deploy the National Guard in the face of uncontrolled anarchy. The judge claimed there was no evidence to support the President’s decision despite the violence, looting, and organized illegal actions.

The law gives the President the authority to issue a finding of rebellion as just cause for deploying the National Guard. You don't understand that, do you? The judge decided to ignore the mountain of evidence supporting the President’s legal finding in favor of parroting the Democrats "mostly peaceful" propaganda.

Let's observe that your analogy is completely irrelevant to the issue at hand.

Indeed, the referee/umpire/legal expert isn't empowered to insert his or her personal opinion of the Bad Orange Man as a substitute for the law.

Wildly irrelevant. A violation of discovery rules has nothing to do with a District court judge second guessing a Presidential declaration.

The case was brought out of purely political ambition on the part of Gavin Newsome.

Except that is not what happened here. There was no lofty legal analysis involved. The judge ignored the evidence to side with the Orange Man Bad lynch mob.
Click to expand...

That was a Rebellion? Tell me why the Bundy Ranch wasn’t a Rebellion by these standards?
 
NolanVoyd said:
There is no evidence of "uncontrolled anarchy"


But there must be evidence of "rebellion"

The president cant just make shit up as an excuse to deploy the guard.

In this case there is no evodence of rebellion.

No the judge found there is no ebodence to support the presidents position.
Click to expand...
The 9th court of appeals, one of the most reliably far Left in the country, quickly stayed the judge's ridiculous denial of reality. But restoring order played no part filing the lawsuit. It's all about abusing the court system for political power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom