Nonsense.
There are these things on your smartphone called "apps". You can download them and they will increase the functionality of your phone/device. Now I know this might sound crazy but pretty much all news outlets have these so called "apps". Try to Google them if you want to get a better understanding of how they work.
More nonsense.
Go stir your sauce.
Or, educated person. Those of us who do not accept idiot sources.
And most younger folks dont use them or don't know the difference between real news outlets and bullshit.
proof?
It's how forums work, so not so much. You post something, and people will respond.
I know exactly how they work, but the massive gap in your overly simplistic analysis is how news aggregation works on different social media sites where consumers are viewing other content. So rather than going to specific sites, they view news through sites that aggregate news articles via a social media service, or are reposts from influential posters on those social media sites. It's a news coming to the audience model versus the audience going to news.There are these things on your smartphone called "apps". You can download them and they will increase the functionality of your phone/device. Now I know this might sound crazy but pretty much all news outlets have these so called "apps". Try to Google them if you want to get a better understanding of how they work.
Not really, and you would know this if you actually understood what's going on across media environments.More nonsense.
You can worry about my sauce, but you'd probably be better served by better researching this issue to avoid making silly comments.Go stir your sauce.
@ iamwhatiseem, and you know that, how?
Doubling down on the nonsense. Who do you think you are fooling?
I never gave an analysis on how news aggregation works. I simply pointed out in one instance your flawed logic, and questioned if you even new legacy news was also available to stream. You must still be struggling with that.
You have no idea what I know or don't know. It's just more nonsense. More passive aggressive insults.
You're sauce is very weak. Probably best just to throw out the whole batch and start over.
Again, more nonsense. This whole exercise was about MSNBC and CNN viewerships tanking. That has nothing to do with your charts or any other point you are trying(poorly) to make. It's because they lie to their viewers. They are only spewing Liberal talking points and Trump bashing.To help you on your path, some information to consider:
View attachment 67544529View attachment 67544530
Good luck!
Is that not how forums work?
I mean you tried, but the problem is there was no flawed logic because I was pointing out what is actually happening in how people are consuming news. All you did is blurt out "but news apps!" as if that provided any actual insight. Of course there are news apps, and news organizations have a presence in streaming, but that doesn't mean much when people are relying on those platforms less and sourcing their news through social media platforms.
I can only base it on what you post, and based on what you've posted on the topic, it is lacking based on what is actually going on and what you posit.
Indeed, and what I did is add much needed context to the laughably simplistic comment you made as to why. There's been all sorts of nonsense that what's happening is exclusive to Trump/the election results which is not the entire story. You then make a baseless remark that the audience dip is because they lie to their viewers, which is laughable given that Fox News settled for a record amount of money for lying and people still tune in.
You're not trying at all.You are trying too hard.
