That's absolute nonsense. You've even got the dating wrong. Like I've always said, you guys don't do your homework.
You are a
View attachment 67415650
Don't forget to mention you also have your Satanic looking arsenal of angry, vicious, rapid hyena pics.Nonsense. I have the historical Gospels and epistles. You guys have hot air and nothing of substance to knock down the resurrection. YOU HAVE NOTHING.
When did facts and logic ever matter to those buried in dogma?The body actually cant reanimate after so long being dead. Its just not possible.
We often use science to determine if what is claimed by historical figures actually happen.
He reminds me of a failed narcissist’s flying monkey on behalf of the biggest narcissist ever created.Don't forget to mention you also have your Satanic looking arsenal of angry, vicious, rapid hyena pics.
The internet remembers all.this thread might be more documented.
i'm looking for the "way back machine" Bible to see what stuff we didn't know.The internet remembers all.
Wait until he finds out who leads the hyenasDon't forget to mention you also have your Satanic looking arsenal of angry, vicious, rapid hyena pics.
Nonsense. I have the historical Gospels and epistles. You guys have hot air and nothing of substance to knock down the resurrection. YOU HAVE NOTHING.
How about we don't respond to this @Logicman any further, until he directly responds to the information he begged for and received multiple times?
Rotflmo
Sorry, your circular logic is a joke. You need to prove the dead can un-dead themselves.
Its always the same nonsense.
I'm certainly not going to ask where the resurrection was documented, we'd be here till the next great extinction. Trying to explain something expecting comprehension? Not wasting my time any more on that either.How about we don't respond to this @Logicman any further, until he directly responds to the information he begged for and received multiple times?
Please speak to my posts...
I have. See this post. https://debatepolitics.com/threads/jesus-christ’s-resurrection-is-probably-the-best-documented-historical-event-ever.478343/post-1076655326
You STILL have not provided any substantive arguments or evidences that demonstrate that the Gospel accounts of the resurrection of Jesus Christ are fictitious. If they were such a load of nonsense you ought to be able to demolish them ten times over. Yet all I get from skeptics like you are one or two kibitzer responses with nothing of substance .
Now do you have anything or not, and please spare me your one liners.
First show me the scientific studies that demonstrate that God and the supernatural - i.e. a resurrection - do not and cannot exist?
So, science isn't on your side and neither is history.
As for your nonsensical "circular logic" claim, understand this:
The Gospels / New Testament are not circular logic / reasoning. In fact, they weren't even "the Bible" in the first century. What they were, were some two dozen individual manuscripts, written by mostly different authors at different times in different locales. As such, those manuscripts constitute MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT REPORTS OR CONFIRMATIONS for the life of Christ, etc. So, the "circular reasoning" claim is not only sophomoric, but disingenuous as well.
I'm certainly not going to ask where the resurrection was documented, we'd be here till the next great extinction.
See a list of postings supporting the evidences for the resurrection here: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/jesus-christ’s-resurrection-is-probably-the-best-documented-historical-event-ever.478343/post-1076655310
And once again, it shouldn't be too difficult to read a book. The evidence is there, you just refuse to do your homework. Also, I don't recall where you responded to me asking for an example of when you claimed Dr. Habermas 'seemed confused'. Where is that?
View attachment 67415699
This has already been posted directly to him, multiple times. The point, that is. He never actually responds to it. He just enjoys the attention.
That's a lie. See the following post that refutes you and others who make the same unfounded claim: https://debatepolitics.com/threads/jesus-christ’s-resurrection-is-probably-the-best-documented-historical-event-ever.478343/post-1076655310
You presented no evidence. But when you thought you did, all of it was directly addressed.How about you people first go back and review the numerous postings where I provided information and evidences for the resurrection? Did all that go over your heads?
If someone does not have personal experience with something (be it "material" or "immaterial") then, if they accept second (or worse) hand information regarding the existence of that thing, they BELIEVE that that thing is "real".Rutabagas are a known physical thing. Your qualification that everyone doesn't know they exist is meaningless. When people don't know of something physical, they can be told about it. They don't have to believe in it. With gods, all there is only belief in them, no knowledge at all.
I'm quite prepared to bet that the Sun will appear to rise in the East tomorrow morning (to the extent of betting the ranch on it). On the other hand, I do not totally dismiss the possibility that the Sun might "go nova" while I am sleeping and, hence, will NOT appear to rise in the East tomorrow morning (although I don't make any plans that take that possibility into account).You know that the sun will appear because the sun exists and has a relationship in space with the earth. No belief i required for you to know this. You know that the sun exists at night as well. We have facts that we know about the sun and earth. We don't have to believe anything about them.
See above for the difference between "knowing" and "believing". A person can "believe" in something to such a level that they will always act as if that something is "real" and (depending on what that thing is) the odds may very well favour (and to an immense degree) them in their decision based on what they "believe to be real".Not sure what gambling has to do with the difference between knowing and just believing.
Obviously you have not read any of the "Holy Books" issued (and advertised as totally authoritative) by any religion.What reported observations of gods? There are none. That is the point you don't seem to get.
Betting on a sure thing is still betting.Not completely. Betting is still a game of chance, research is also testing hypothesis against eachother and more. Not remotely close to gambling. Desired results tends to lead to a lot of confirmation bias, when you lose your desired results you still learn something from it and change your desired results quite often.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?