- Joined
- Dec 27, 2017
- Messages
- 22,825
- Reaction score
- 25,556
- Location
- Middle of it all
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Oh Fox, tryin' ta keep those Russian handlers happy, don't ya know.
The problem is they're immune to facts as their constant nonsense has long proven.Oh Fox, tryin' ta keep those Russian handlers happy, don't ya know.
She sure seemed to have asked a legitimate question, and the press secretary sure seemed to have dodged the question.
Yet, sending MiGs would be considered offensive. Politicians sure like to have their cake and eat it too.Oh Fox, tryin' ta keep those Russian handlers happy, don't ya know.
The press secretary politely informed her that Ukraine is "defending" their country from the Russian Invaders. Therefore, the weapons in question are being used in a defensive capacity. That's the simplest way I can explain it to you so if your still having trouble understanding, I can't help you.She sure seemed to have asked a legitimate question, and the press secretary sure seemed to have dodged the question.
LOL, good ol' Jan - total bullshit and misdirection. Not even close to responding to the questionOh Fox, tryin' ta keep those Russian handlers happy, don't ya know.
How? Any weapon used to attack Russians invading Ukraine is a defensive weapon, much as any weapon used to attack Ukrainians invading Russia would be.She sure seemed to have asked a legitimate question, and the press secretary sure seemed to have dodged the question.
Watch it slower, maybe.
Why wouldn't that same logic apply to MIGs as well? This administration is using a metric different from your definition and the reporter simply asked which side di drones fall. Are they offense or defensive weapons? Psaki did not answer her question.The press secretary politely informed her that Ukraine is "defending" their country from the Russian Invaders. Therefore, the weapons in question are being used in a defensive capacity. That's the simplest way I can explain it to you so if your still having trouble understanding, I can't help you.
Somehow I think this administration would win a candor contest with the previous one, tho that is admittedly damning it with faint praise.Why wouldn't that same logic apply to MIGs as well? This administration is using a metric different from your definition and the reporter simply asked which side di drones fall. Are they offense or defensive weapons? Psaki did not answer her question.
What amazes about the lack of transparency this administration has about everything is in plain sight of the public. Many of us don't waste our breath complaining about it and just make a mental note of their lack of candor. I don't know how they think this is gonna play well for them during the elections.
She didn't dodge it. Russia is the aggressor. Ukraine is not moving into Russia. Therefore. The weapons Ukraine is using is defensive. 2+2=4She sure seemed to have asked a legitimate question, and the press secretary sure seemed to have dodged the question.
Who is Xiden? Is this something from Qanon?I almost feel sorry for Jen Goebbels. Has to be humiliating to go out there and gaslight the public every day, defending Xiden's constant pathological lying.
Sad!
The first 100 days of a US president’s tenure often mark the progress and promise of a young administration. Much can be accomplished during a president’s first 100 days, which is why pundits use it to signal each administration’s activity level.
Instead of investigating the first 100 days in terms of productivity or promises kept, let’s look at another characteristic: honesty. It is important to hold leaders accountable to the truth, especially early in their presidency.
The Washington Post suggests President Donald Trump told 30,573 false or misleading statements over 4 years. Based on this number, he is clearly a prolific liar.
But, were his lies observable during the first 100 days? Crucially, how does President Trump compare to other leaders such as President Biden and President Obama?
In his first 100 days, President Trump had 29 statements assessed by PolitiFact (17 false) compared to 12 statements from President Obama (1 false) and 4 statements from President Biden (2 false). As a raw count, Trump told more falsehoods than Biden and Obama combined.
You would be wrong too. In any case this isn't a contest between the last administration and the current one. This administration refuses to answer very basic questions.Somehow I thing this administration would win a candor contest with the previous one, tho that is admittedly damning it with faint praise.
It would if it were the Ukrainian's flying the migs.Why wouldn't that same logic apply to MIGs as well?
What a stupid question. Here it is in a nutshell just for you. Any weapons that the Ukrainian's use to defend their country from invading forces are, by definition, defensive weapons. I cannot explain it any simpler than that.This administration is using a metric different from your definition and the reporter simply asked which side di drones fall. Are they offense or defensive weapons? Psaki did not answer her question.
What's truly Amazing is you don't know that Russia is invading Ukraine and Ukraine is defending their Homeland. That makes any weapons Ukraine uses to defend itself, defensive weapons.What amazes about the lack of transparency this administration has about everything is in plain sight of the public. Many of us don't waste our breath complaining about it and just make a mental note of their lack of candor. I don't know how they think this is gonna play well for them during the elections.
No fair comparing Biden with Trump on lying, like comparing a utility infielder with Babe Ruth.Who is Xiden? Is this something from Qanon?
As to your claim about pathological lying,
Is capitalist Forbes conservative enough for you as a source?
Who Lied More During Their First 100 Days: Biden, Trump, Or Obama?
In his first 100 days, President Trump had 29 statements assessed by PolitiFact (17 false) compared to 12 statements from President Obama (1 false) and 4 statements from President Biden (2 false).www.forbes.com
So why didn't Psaki just say the drones are defensive weapons?It would if it were the Ukrainian's flying the migs.
What a stupid question. Here it is in a nutshell just for you. Any weapons that the Ukrainian's use to defend their country from invading forces are, by definition, defensive weapons. I cannot explain it any simpler than that.
What's truly Amazing is you don't know that Russia is invading Ukraine and Ukraine is defending their Homeland. That makes any weapons Ukraine uses to defend itself, defensive weapons.
I didn’t think it was a dodge. Tell me what she should have said.So why didn't Psaki just say the drones are defensive weapons?
Why dodge the question?
Oh look, a Putinbot who joined the forum 2 weeks before the Russian invasion has an opinion. How cute that you think anyone cares.I almost feel sorry for Jen Goebbels. Has to be humiliating to go out there and gaslight the public every day, defending Xiden's constant pathological lying.
Sad!
She did. She politely reminded the journalist that Russia attacked Ukraine. Should Psaki have to school an adult that any weapon you use to defend yourself is a defensive weapon? Where is the disconnect with you that your not understanding?So why didn't Psaki just say the drones are defensive weapons?
Why dodge the question?
That isn’t an answer to the question. If a Mig is an offensive weapon how is a drone a defensive weapon?She did. She politely reminded the journalist that Russia attacked Ukraine. Where is the disconnect with you that your not understanding?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?