Jen Psaki Angered After Chris Wallace Says Biden "Sheltered" From Press

[VySky]

Chris stepping it up since he’s looking for work.

Poor slow Joe

——

In a Wednesday interview Chris Wallace grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on why President Joe Biden seems to be carefully shielded from the press, resulting in her getting visibly agitated.

The tense exchange, which aired on the soon to be defunct CNN+, started with the former FOX host asking, "Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?" Watch Psaki grow flustered and increasingly upset while straining to present a smile:

Watch: Jen Psaki Angered After Chris Wallace Says Biden "Sheltered" From Press | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Mr Person]

ZeroHedge says that a spokesperson was "angered" by someone else's question?

This is supposed to be fodder for a political discussion? The only way that works is if the subject is the sheer vapidity of modern political discussion.

 

[VySky]

ZeroHedge says that a spokesperson was "angered" by someone else's question?

This is supposed to be fodder for a political discussion? The only way that works is if the subject is the sheer vapidity of modern political discussion.

Oh no, it works man.

Just not for you.

 

[Mr Person]

Oh no, it works man.

Just not for you.

"Works"?

Only in the sense that your masters can get the easily duped Trumpists hopping angry with the most hilariously irrelevant crap.




Hey, help me out a sec: was Psaki wearing a tan suit when she was "angry"? Did she perhaps make a comment about having eaten a burger with dijon mustard? Put her feet up on a desk? Those are the real crimes, and we all know how Obama uses deep state lizardman powers to make Biden dance like a puppet. Well, inbetween all the child sex trafficking pizza rings he runs.

 

[DiAnna]

"Zerohedge"

Not credible.

 

[Grandpappy]

Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?

Haha.

 

[tres borrachos]

Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?

Haha.

Eat more catfish.

 

[Mr Person]

Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?

Haha.

The Eastern bunny is a socialist commie who wants to force you to become vegan. You should praise Biden, for he refused the Bunny's racist request and stopped the Bunny from grooming children.

 

[Rawley]

Oh no, it works man.

Just not for you.

SHe's pissed that he's exposing their strategy of hiding the senile simp from the press.

 

[Grandpappy]

https://www.newsweek.com/video-easter-bunny-interrupting-joe-biden-viewed-5-million-times-1698817

 

[Linuxcooldude]

"Zerohedge"

Not credible.

Interview video is posted on their website. As usual, blame the source, not the information they provide.

 

[VySky]

Didn't the Easter bunny just tell Joe it was time for his nap, or something?

Haha.

That was red in that suit

 

[Buckeyes85]

Was that the right link? I watched, waiting for her to become "visibly angry." But didn't see that. What I did see was her pushing back from the erroneous contention of Biden being sheltered via use of hand picked stats like the number of interviews granted. If Trump invited a friendly reporter in from Faux news 75 times to loft him softball questions, is that really supposed to be an example of making himself available to the press?

 

[Peacenik]

Chris stepping it up since he’s looking for work.

Poor slow Joe

——

In a Wednesday interview Chris Wallace grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on why President Joe Biden seems to be carefully shielded from the press, resulting in her getting visibly agitated.

The tense exchange, which aired on the soon to be defunct CNN+, started with the former FOX host asking, "Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?" Watch Psaki grow flustered and increasingly upset while straining to present a smile:

Watch: Jen Psaki Angered After Chris Wallace Says Biden "Sheltered" From Press | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Wallace repeatedly interrupted Psaki, firing new questions at her before she had even had a chance to address the previous. It is rude. I would characterize Psaki's handling of the rudeness as 'rightfully perturbed.' It was a case of Wallace attempting to initiate an argument, and Psaki patiently attempting to be polite with someone who was not.

 

[Helix]

Zerocred

 

[mrjurrs]

Oh no, it works man.

Just not for you.

Works if you mean confuses R's further...

 

[Rawley]

Was that the right link? I watched, waiting for her to become "visibly angry." But didn't see that. What I did see was her pushing back from the erroneous contention of Biden being sheltered via use of hand picked stats like the number of interviews granted. If Trump invited a friendly reporter in from Faux news 75 times to loft him softball questions, is that really supposed to be an example of making himself available to the press?

Yup. What a right wing stooge. Hand picking the number of press interviews he gave as an indication of how few press interviews he gave. Outrageous.

 

[Mr Person]

Wallace repeatedly interrupted Psaki, firing new questions at her before she had even had a chance to address the previous. It is rude. I would characterize Psaki's handling of the rudeness as 'rightfully perturbed.' It was a case of Wallace attempting to initiate an argument, and Psaki patiently attempting to be polite with someone who was not.

I would be visibly annoyed with such a hamfisted attempt at framing.

"Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?"

It's built to make it look like Psaki is evading. She couldn't answer it directly without assuming the truth of the charge that Biden is "so sheltered." And he didn't ask "why doesn't Biden have X appearances instead of [current number] in [amount of time]", because of course the answer would be that the current amount is sufficient.

Maybe one could ask a reasonable question of "why has Biden only devoted X minutes to [issue], rather than A or B, like President [otherguy] did?"

 

[VySky]

Was that the right link? I watched, waiting for her to become "visibly angry." But didn't see that. What I did see was her pushing back from the erroneous contention of Biden being sheltered via use of hand picked stats like the number of interviews granted. If Trump invited a friendly reporter in from Faux news 75 times to loft him softball questions, is that really supposed to be an example of making himself available to the press?

The above is a lie

 

[Gateman_Wen]

Chris stepping it up since he’s looking for work.

Poor slow Joe

——

In a Wednesday interview Chris Wallace grilled White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on why President Joe Biden seems to be carefully shielded from the press, resulting in her getting visibly agitated.

The tense exchange, which aired on the soon to be defunct CNN+, started with the former FOX host asking, "Why has President Biden been so sheltered from the press?" Watch Psaki grow flustered and increasingly upset while straining to present a smile:

Watch: Jen Psaki Angered After Chris Wallace Says Biden "Sheltered" From Press | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

You're gonna need a source for that garbage.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

The above is a lie

Lol, irony is fun!!!

 

[Buckeyes85]

The above is a lie

People who continue to worship Trump as you do have permanently forfeited the right to proclaim when someone else is supposedly lying. You folks simply don't know what it means.

 

[VySky]

People who continue to worship Trump as you do have permanently forfeited the right to proclaim when someone else is supposedly lying. You folks simply don't know what it means.

I have forfeited nothing

 

[Buckeyes85]

I have forfeited nothing

Au contraire, you have forfeited quite a lot by continuing to fawn over that fraudster. Whether you admit it or not is immaterial.

 

[VySky]

Au contraire, you have forfeited quite a lot by continuing to fawn over that fraudster. Whether you admit it or not is immaterial.

Meh. Trumps not my first pick. But if he’s on the ticket he gets my vote.