Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking

[ataraxia]

This likely has nothing to do with the deep state. It could be that the DoJ simply cannot release a bunch of names of people who have not been charged with a crime and have not even been accused of a crime. If the DoJ has evidence that the CEO of Joe Blow Industries engaged in sex with minors on Epstein Island, then the DoJ needs to indict this individual

Oh yes, we all know Trump's DOJ has the professionalism and integrity to do something like that with Trump. Trump has really cleaned up the federal government. So now I hope you are enjoying your "shallow state"!

 

[uptower]

Most of your post is just misleading rhetoric that doesn't warrant any attention.
And you failed to address any of the substance. As in, why no arrests, and how can they justify throwing names of innocent people out there? Unless they have a case against someone, every name would have to be redacted.

So do they have the names or not? Bondi did not claim she was protecting anyone's privacy. She said they had nothing at all. Get your story straight.

 

[Airyaman]

These damn leftists are coming out of the woodwork.

 

[uptower]

Where did you see that Trump is "all over" the "list"? There are a few photos of Trump and Epstein, which means nothing, that the media keep recycling. How many times is "all over" the so called list? When did he go to the island? What woman was he with?

You're moving the goalposts again. We know DJT and Epstein hung out and he flew on the Lolita Express. We know there have been accusations of sex with minors.

I'm not here to argue whether everything we've heard is true or not: my assertion is Trump doesn't want these inconvenient photos and allegations back in the public eye. Since his name will appear in at least these known circumstances in the DOJ records, that's one reason not to want them released.

 

[Anthony60]

You're moving the goalposts again. We know DJT and Epstein hung out and he flew on the Lolita Express. We know there have been accusations of sex with minors.

I'm not here to argue whether everything we've heard is true or not: my assertion is Trump doesn't want these inconvenient photos and allegations back in the public eye. Since his name will appear in at least these known circumstances in the DOJ records, that's one reason not to want them released.

They are your goalposts, and you just moved them.

 

[venice_ca]

I may have visited the Chicken Ranch in La Grange, TX (a time or two), but never for the sexual experience.

Oh! Now I finally understand the reference in Willis Alan Ramsey’s song Northeast Texas Women.

“And if ya don't like love attachments,
If your taste in women gets strange,
Go on and spend the money my friend
Down in old La Grange.”

Ramsey was part of my crash course on Texas music by a long ago boyfriend originally from Lubbock, and a much easier sell than Bob Wills and the Texas Playboys.

 

[Peacenik]

You have the freedom to (occasionally) vote for candidates running for your state’s two US Senate seats, single US House District Representative and the POTUS. If you think a candidate is being unduly influenced by “big money” then don’t cast your vote for them.

How many of those races even have a choice of a candidate who isn't bought. Both sides are bought.

I hope you don't think you have any representation, do you? None of us do. Unless one of us is a billionaire. Billionaires have the influence.

The BBB Big Billionaires Bill was more unpopular than favored by the voters. But we got it anyway. Why? Because the billionaires wanted it.

We have to fix that. We need better candidate choices. We have to change the political climate. We better form local left/right coalitions to pass local nonbinding resolutions in support of the American Anti Corruption Act now. When that happens in enough places and goes viral? Then we will have better candidate choices. That will change the political climate. It will send the message that we want better candidates. Candidates who can't be bought. Candidates who only take small donations. Candidates who will pass the Act as soon as enough of Congress is replaced. That's how we do it. Yes, it's a long haul so we better get started by getting in touch with local town and county councils, talking to people. Find out who is in favor of corruption and who wants to take a stand against it.

That's how we do it. That's what we can do for our country.

 

[ttwtt78640]

How many of those races even have a choice of a candidate who isn't bought. Both sides are bought.

I hope you don't think you have any representation, do you? None of us do. Unless one of us is a billionaire. Billionaires have the influence.

The BBB Big Billionaires Bill was more unpopular than favored by the voters. But we got it anyway. Why? Because the billionaires wanted it.

We have to fix that. We need better candidate choices. We have to change the political climate. We better form local left/right coalitions to pass local nonbinding resolutions in support of the American Anti Corruption Act now. When that happens in enough places and goes viral? Then we will have better candidate choices. That will change the political climate. It will send the message that we want better candidates. Candidates who can't be bought. Candidates who only take small donations. Candidates who will pass the Act as soon as enough of Congress is replaced. That's how we do it. Yes, it's a long haul so we better get started by getting in touch with local town and county councils, talking to people. Find out who is in favor of corruption and who wants to take a stand against it.

That's how we do it. That's what we can do for our country.

You, like most of the electorate, likely voted for candidates backed by “big money”.

 

[Peacenik]

You, like most of the electorate, likely voted for candidates backed by “big money”.

Because the political climate for better candidates does not exist yet. If we want better choices all across America we have to make passing those nonbinding resolutions go viral. It will happen when people get fed up enough with billionaires making government serve them.

 

[Airyaman]

 

[911Sparky]

Sorry, article title did not fit, they made it too long.

Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking her?​

Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal client list

'Despite the rumors, Ghislaine was never offered any kind of plea deal. She would be more than happy to sit before Congress and tell her story,' sources tell the Daily Mail.

www.dailymail.co.uk

View attachment 67579678

It's on now MAGA. Will you let Ghislaine testify before Congress on the Epstein files/list? If you choose to not believe her, that's fine. But what about those who want to see some resolution to this whole debacle?

I suspect there are politicians on both sides of the aisle who are not anxious to hear from Maxwell.

 

[Airyaman]

Another leftist chimes in (one DP member's favorite Xitter source):

 

[uptower]

They are your goalposts, and you just moved them.

No my assertion has always been Trump doesn't like the stories repeated. There might be more, but what we've seen and heard is bad enough. It really gets under his skin.

And those of his fanbois it seems.

 

[911Sparky]

Tell us again, why is this list so damned important to the average citizen?
Is there not enough salacious news circulating around to satisfy Americans' prurient desires?

I, for one, would like to know if any of the men on the list are politicians or businessmen whose products I use, I would never vote for, or knowingly buy the products of a pedophile.

 

[Anthony60]

No my assertion has always been Trump doesn't like the stories repeated. There might be more, but what we've seen and heard is bad enough. It really gets under his skin.

And those of his fanbois it seems.

I think he just wants to get on with his agenda.

 

[Puigb]

I think he just wants to get on with his agenda.

So he should release the list and get it all over with...

 

[Anthony60]

So he should release the list and get it all over with...

What list?

 

[Puigb]

What list?

lol.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Let's be honest. Some of us believe Trump is wrapped up in all of this,

Only the TDS crowd. The rest can work out that if there was anything harmful to Trump, the democraps certainly would have used it in the lead up to the 2024 election.

 

[Puigb]

Only the TDS crowd. The rest can work out that if there was anything harmful to Trump, the democraps certainly would have used it in the lead up to the 2024 election.

So, he could release the files right now then.

 

[Airyaman]

Only the TDS crowd. The rest can work out that if there was anything harmful to Trump, the democraps certainly would have used it in the lead up to the 2024 election.

Dude they were besties for years, and there are more photos of Epstein with Trump than any other public person.

Even before his death Epstein supposedly said Trump was his best friend.

It's not rocket science.

 

[MAGAnificent]

So, he could release the files right now then.

Which ones?

 

[Puigb]

Which ones?

Epstein files. He could release them right now.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Epstein files. He could release them right now.

All of them? I assume you do not include the child pornography files in that demand.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Dude they were besties for years, and there are more photos of Epstein with Trump than any other public person.

Conjecture.

Even before his death Epstein supposedly said Trump was his best friend.

Did you get that from Mother Jones?