Jeffery Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell is ready to reveal 'truth' of the pedophile client list, say insiders. So, why are Republicans blocking

[WillyPete]

If there is a list, Bidens people compiled it. And then promptly hid it from the public. But its bad when Trump does the same thing. It must be great being a liberal when the only standard you need for anything is a double standard.

The difference being Biden never PROMISED his supporters he'd release it.

What's that got to do with liberals, Biden, Joe Mama, or anyone else except Trump and the goofs he's making promises to?

 

[Anthony60]

There's no "playbook". We're just reacting to the news as it happens.

LOL, sure.

You're butthurt for the same reason Trump is - his name keeps coming up with Epstein's no matter how hard he tries to bury it.

Well the more you lot try to run from it, the more I'll keep reminding you. As long as the story is hot.

The left wants that to be true, so badly. But, no, it doesn't. More Clinton.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

??? Lots of people on the right are upset by the handling of this. How do you not know this? The lefts only interest is hoping to nail Trump, not out of any interest of getting justice for the victims.

Proof? Or is this just what you want to believe because you're so upset that Taco is likely on the list?

If you found out tomorrow that Trumps name is NOT on the list, you would lose all interest in the Epstein affair.

A lie. When the Epstein files were a hot item for MAGAs (seconds before they found out Taco might be on the list), I was 100% on-board with them being released. I'm sure I posted about that at the time.

 

[Fletch]

Absolutely not.

You have no idea what you are talking about, nor do you actually have ANY interest in getting to the bottom of it, yours is the true virtue signalling.

I have been consistent on this issue from the start. Your interest is just your usual 'get Trump' attitude that you have on everything. I want the truth to come out. You dont.

Because lets be real, we know WHY all the evidence hasn't been released and why it was all hushed up, because of who's involved, so that's the base of it.

Probably which is why so many people on the right are disappointed in the way it is being handled. Even if there is no list, there are still likely hundreds of pedophiles out there that have escaped justice. We want them prosecuted. Your only interest is 'get Trump.' You dont give a shit about the victims or anything else.

Biden is dead to me and deserves the scorn of history for MANY reasons including this one, every single person who was involved across 3 administrations should be hauled before some untainted system to explain what occurred here and be held accountable.

Yeah, bullshit. If he had won reelection youd be here cradling his fossilized balls.

But at the core of it, you still support a person who:

Allowed Epstein to be killed on his watch.

Trump 'allowed' it?? Was he on duty at the prison at the time?

Has destroyed evidence.

Has released doctored video.

What are you refering to?

Is screaming at the top of his lungs for everyone to shut up about it.

Thats like the first ture thing you have written in months. Howd that happen?

And you are entirely unbothered.

Im not unbothered. And Ive said that over and over. You just refuse to listen to anything but your own biased, hateful beliefs.

 

[Emlee]

That's what people don't get. MAGA has been demanding "the list" for years, including Bongino and Patel. No one on the left was demanding any such list, it was MAGA. And then they all got their hopes up when Patel and Bongino went to the FBI and Bondi said she would release "the list".

The only thing the "left" is doing is mocking MAGA for falling for it once again. They get duped daily and come back the next day for more.

I'm not on "the left" but I don't want any list or files or anything. I would like to see some of the pedos held responsible, but it's obvious that will never happen.

What is obvious is that Trump gets very angry about the whole subject. His multi-page rant over the weekend exemplifies that. He has never wanted to release anything on Epstein., and that goes back to last year. Is it because he is implicated? I mean he and Epstein were besties for years, and he did fly on Lolita Express multiple times. But does that mean he is a pedo? We'll probably never know.

Exactly 100%

Except most people do get it but just refuse to admit it. Others don’t bother paying attention or care about any actual facts or how something actually transpired, just see that something is attached to dear leader and automatically go to deflection mode. It’s never about actual facts, how something transpired or even honesty, anything that touches dear leader or anyone close to him must be shouted down, deflected and flipped, no excuse is ever too lame.

This entire uproar was 100% maga induced, no one would even have been talking about it now if not for the Bongino/maga meltdowns. .

And it has come back to bite some right in the ass but dear leader demanded they all stop talking about Epstein lol.

 

[Fletch]

The difference being Biden never PROMISED his supporters he'd release it.

LOL. And that is somehow better??? Your argument is that Biden is a better guy because he just swept the entire Epstein affair under the rug? WTF dude

What's that got to do with liberals, Biden, Joe Mama, or anyone else except Trump and the goofs he's making promises to?

Yes, Trump would be so much better if he had just buried the story the way Biden did

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Most of your post is just misleading rhetoric that doesn't warrant any attention.

LOL there are posts on here, and everywhere, as well as news articles of the time, of MAGAs yelling for that list and for arrests.

Well, until they found out Taco might be on it. Now the tune has changed. Obviously.

And you failed to address any of the substance. As in, why no arrests, and how can they justify throwing names of innocent people out there?

I have no idea why. I have been calling for the list to be released since MAGAs were yelling for it. ETA: You know, that's not fully true. I think we all know why arrests are made on the little people but not on the wealthy and connected.

Unless they have a case against someone, every name would have to be redacted.

Okay, that's fine. Let's see the list, nobody's going to be arrested, not even Taco...right?

But it may give a jumping-off point. Who knows what's on that list besides simply names?

 

[Fletch]

Proof? Or is this just what you want to believe because you're so upset that Taco is likely on the list?

Who?

A lie. When the Epstein files were a hot item for MAGAs (seconds before they found out Taco might be on the list), I was 100% on-board with them being released. I'm sure I posted about that at the time.

Ill believe it when I see such a post. In the mean time I will just lump you in with the rest of the TDS Borg who only care because they think that Trump is 'likely on the list.'

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Who?

Ill believe it when I see such a post.

Okay.

Post in thread 'Time to stop the protection of the pedophiles.'

Dec 2, 2024

Yeah... cause Epstein was known to hang out with Republicans and not Democrats.

He hung out quite cozily with Dump.

Today that man is the president elect.

You don't want to know? I do. Any and all. Dem, Republican, who cares?

All.

• EnchantedMuggle

Post in thread 'Time to stop the protection of the pedophiles.'

Dec 2, 2024

What will happen to those in the log?
Nothing, perhaps one will run for president and win.

Already did.

Now, FWIW, I'm not sure what a flight log would prove. It can't prove actual rape.

But should any, and I mean the tiniest evidence of any contact with children on Epstein Island at any time, no matter how distant in the past, with any figure, no matter how public, no matter how powerful, no matter how old and pathetic...no matter what, be released?

I say YES. ALL. No holds barred.

• EnchantedMuggle

ETA: Not sure why my posts aren't showing up above but if you click on the links they take you directly to my posts.

In the mean time I will just lump you in with the rest of the TDS Borg who only care because they think that Trump is 'likely on the list.'

 

[What if...?]

SO, you are in favor of implicating anyone who was on that island with Epstein regardless if they engaged in any sexual acts with underage women?
Is 'guilt by association' enough to libel and slander anyone who was libidinous to visit that fantasy island?
How do you separate the actual sexual abusers from those who are unwitting gawkers?
Not to put too fine a point on that.

There really is no way they wouldn’t have known what was going on even if they didn’t “partake” themselves.

People with money eventually get tired of the “regular” things they get to enjoy that the poor don’t. And they move farther and farther into more and more extreme activities. Rock stars, athletes and yes, hedge fund managers etc.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

There really is no way they wouldn’t have known what was going on even if they didn’t “partake” themselves.

This! Come on, teenage girls are taken upstairs with grown men, nobody thinks anything is going on?

They are certainly implicated.

People with money eventually get tired of the “regular” things they get to enjoy that the poor don’t. And they move farther and farther into more and more extreme activities. Rock stars, athletes and yes, hedge fund managers etc.

 

[maxparrish]

??? You think thats a 'good reason???' Thats corruption by definition.

Zealots???? WTF dude? There are supposed a thousand women who were victimized as minors and it is zealotry to want those people charged with a crime.?

There is only one thing that explains a post like yours--TDS

A 'good political reason' does not suggest it is rooted in ethics, morality, virtue, or law - it denotes that it was motivated by beneficial strategic calculations in politics - in this case to avoid political fallout and protect oneself or allies.

'Zealots' is an accurate term. Regardless of the virtue, or lack thereof, of a Zealot's cause they are by definition fanatical, unwilling to tolerate nuanced or different views, and obsessed, e,g. .; much of MAGA and most of those going ballistic over the list that may never have existed.

 

[uptower]

Of course they have a file on him, they arrested him.
A DOJ list of people is not the much ballyhooed "client list".

Now, where you are going is a list compiled by DOJ for the trial, not the so called, much media hyped, super duper secret list, kept by Epstein and Maxwell.
So, as far as we know, no list exists or was ever kept.

I think this fixation on a "list" - notably first in the affirmative by MAGA when it was sure Clinton would would be the target and now in the negative because it looks like Trump is all over it - is another attempt to move the goalpost or muddy the waters. It doesn't matter what you call it, the DOJ has the skinny on Epstein's friends.

First Bondi claimed she had it, and now she swears she doesn't.

Why? Even if the only references to Convicted felon Donald Trump are what we already know about his relationship with Epstein, then at the very least he - and you apparently - can't stand it being repeated.

Bondi's clumsy attempt at secrecy only strengthens the notion it's worse than that.

 

[Airyaman]

Damn leftists, must have invaded the TPUSA conference!

 

[Anthony60]

LOL there are posts on here, and everywhere, as well as news articles of the time, of MAGAs yelling for that list and for arrests.
Well, until they found out Taco might be on it. Now the tune has changed. Obviously.
I have no idea why. I have been calling for the list to be released since MAGAs were yelling for it. ETA: You know, that's not fully true. I think we all know why arrests are made on the little people but not on the wealthy and connected.
Okay, that's fine. Let's see the list, nobody's going to be arrested, not even Taco...right?
But it may give a jumping-off point. Who knows what's on that list besides simply names?

Listen, I can't keep up with all the left's juvenile name calling. If you expect to be taken seriously and want a reply, don't bother with the 3rd grade stuff. It completely undermines everything you just said, and it makes no sense for me to reply anymore at that point.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Listen, I can't keep up with all the left's juvenile name calling.

You kept up with Sleepy Joe, Dementia Joe, xoe, Kamaltoe, Obummer, etc. just fine.

I think what you mean is, you can't keep up with the truth being shown here.

If you expect to be taken seriously and want a reply, don't bother with the 3rd grade stuff.

So you have no defense.

It completely undermines everything you just said,

So you have no defense.

and it makes no sense for me to reply anymore at that point.

I understand that you have no good argument. It's obvious. But that doesn't mean nobody should point it out.

 

[Airyaman]

I wish these leftists would just drop it!

 

[Anthony60]

I think this fixation on a "list" - notably first in the affirmative by MAGA when it was sure Clinton would would be the target and now in the negative because it looks like Trump is all over it...

Where did you see that Trump is "all over" the "list"? There are a few photos of Trump and Epstein, which means nothing, that the media keep recycling. How many times is "all over" the so called list? When did he go to the island? What woman was he with?

 

[Anthony60]

You kept...

Have a good one!

 

[WillyPete]

LOL. And that is somehow better??? Your argument is that Biden is a better guy because he just swept the entire Epstein affair under the rug? WTF dude

Politically, doing nothing and not lying was clearly a smarter move than doing nothing and lying about it.

And sure, morally Biden should have released it and let the chips fall where they may.

 

[EnchantedMuggle]

Where did you see that Trump is "all over" the "list"? There are a few photos of Trump and Epstein, which means nothing, that the media keep recycling. How many times is "all over" the so called list? When did he go to the island? What woman was he with?

That's it. Keep up with the defense of one man. Just one man. Under every possible circumstance.

To heck with the kids.

Right?

 

[Peacenik]

That’s hard to do when the federal government (alone) is fast approaching supplying 25% of US GDP.

I'm not talking about the size of government. Please allow me to edit that statement:

'Then it is time to get the influence of big money out of government.'

We will be fine with a larger government as long as that government is representing and serving We, The People. That we benefit from!

The problem is our government is bought. It serves the rich. That's the big money we have to get out of government. The influence of big money.

We want actual representation with our taxation.

 

[SCrider]

Why the **** would anyone with an IQ above room temperature believe her?

Do you really trust her? Why?

You believe Trump

 

[ttwtt78640]

I'm not talking about the size of government. Please allow me to edit that statement:

'Then it is time to get the influence of big money out of government.'

We will be fine with a larger government as long as that government is representing and serving We, The People. That we benefit from!

The problem is our government is bought. It serves the rich. That's the big money we have to get out of government. The influence of big money.

We want actual representation with our taxation.

You have the freedom to (occasionally) vote for candidates running for your state’s two US Senate seats, single US House District Representative and the POTUS. If you think a candidate is being unduly influenced by “big money” then don’t cast your vote for them.

 

[Airyaman]

Well known leftist Ben Shapiro simply will not drop this.