Aryan Imperium
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Messages
- 929
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
GySgt said:Don't they subscribe to the "PC" garbage now and refer to it as an "act of nature?"
ban.the.electoral.college said:Probably. I haven't been keeping hip to the latest insurance jargon. I remember once when I was buying car insurance, the agent was giving me a disclaimer on "acts of God".
I'm sorry...I haven't given the update as of yet...Calm2Chaos said:Has he been impeached yet??
:rofl
cnredd said:I'm sorry...I haven't given the update as of yet...
UPDATE...
10-07-05...
Bush is STILL not impeached...:2wave:
cnredd said:I'm sorry...I haven't given the update as of yet...
UPDATE...
10-07-05...
Bush is STILL not impeached...:2wave:
ban.the.electoral.college said:Wrong again pea brain. It's absurd to think that Bush "caused" Katrina. Katrina was an act of god. But, the catastrophic social negligence which followed, was an act of man.
However, you're right about baning the electoral college, and the words are music to my ears. Imagine a day when your votes actually mean something!
Actually, the social negligence which followed was an act of WOman...But that would negate your Bush hating angle, so why mention it, eh?...:dohban.the.electoral.college said:Wrong again pea brain. It's absurd to think that Bush "caused" Katrina. Katrina was an act of god. But, the catastrophic social negligence which followed, was an act of man.
However, you're right about baning the electoral college, and the words are music to my ears. Imagine a day when your votes actually mean something!
AK_Conservative said:Secondly, you want to ban the electoral college! Now wasnt you one of those brainless individuals that said Roberts would eliminate the bill of rights? Yet, there is absolutely no proof to that whatsoever! But here you are, trying to remove a vital piece of our constitution when you have no real understanding on what the electoral college does! The electoral college protects against tyranny of the majority, it preserves Federalism, recounts would be considerably easier, and so on! The only reason you want the electoral college abolished is becuase you can not let go of the fact that al gore lost in 2000 due to the electoral college! Now it is you who is trying to deminish our constitution!
AK_Conservative said:I think you misinterpreted his point ban! He ment cuased the damage! Which, in reality, was due to the local and state levels not acting accordingly! To say it was Bush's fault is absurd! Though there is some blame on the fed government, it majority of the blame is the state and local! During Huricane Rita, the mayor of NO told these people to come back, that it was safe! What if Rita demolished that area? You still would have blammed bush with your asinine rhetoric!
AK_Conservative said:Secondly, you want to ban the electoral college!
AK_Conservative said:Now wasnt you one of those brainless individuals that said Roberts would eliminate the bill of rights? Yet, there is absolutely no proof to that whatsoever!
AK_Conservative said:But here you are, trying to remove a vital piece of our constitution when you have no real understanding on what the electoral college does!
AK_Conservative said:The electoral college protects against tyranny of the majority, it preserves Federalism, recounts would be considerably easier, and so on!
AK_Conservative said:The only reason you want the electoral college abolished is because you can not let go of the fact that al gore lost in 2000 due to the electoral college! Now it is you who is trying to diminish our constitution!
HAHAHAHAHA :roflGySgt said:Very well said. Everytime I see your name I think of the Kalashnikov.
Agreed...SixStringHero said:"Abolishing the electoral college would restore voting power to the people. We live in an age where information is easily accessible unlike the day and age of 218 years ago when the US Constitution was originally framed."
^
Banning the Electoral College would grant precedence to predominantly liberal coastal states with denser populations precedence over the rest of the country. This isn't necessarily a good way to go about it.
SixStringHero said:"Abolishing the electoral college would restore voting power to the people. We live in an age where information is easily accessible unlike the day and age of 218 years ago when the US Constitution was originally framed."
^
Banning the Electoral College would grant precedence to predominantly liberal coastal states with denser populations precedence over the rest of the country. This isn't necessarily a good way to go about it.
AK_Conservative said:I think you misinterpreted his point ban! He ment cuased the damage! Which, in reality, was due to the local and state levels not acting accordingly! To say it was Bush's fault is absurd! Though there is some blame on the fed government, it majority of the blame is the state and local! During Huricane Rita, the mayor of NO told these people to come back, that it was safe! What if Rita demolished that area? You still would have blammed bush with your asinine rhetoric!
Secondly, you want to ban the electoral college! Now wasnt you one of those brainless individuals that said Roberts would eliminate the bill of rights? Yet, there is absolutely no proof to that whatsoever! But here you are, trying to remove a vital piece of our constitution when you have no real understanding on what the electoral college does! The electoral college protects against tyranny of the majority, it preserves Federalism, recounts would be considerably easier, and so on! The only reason you want the electoral college abolished is becuase you can not let go of the fact that al gore lost in 2000 due to the electoral college! Now it is you who is trying to deminish our constitution!
Not true and accuarate at all...ban.the.electoral.college said:And, What do you find so wrong about having a true and acurate reflection of the majority? States would still have equal representation before Congress.
cnredd said:Not true and accuarate at all...
I'll throw out a scaled down version....
Let's say there are 5 states...California, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and Utah...California is overtly Democrat...the other four overtly Republican...If they ALL had equal voter populations, you'd never see a Democratic President ever again...But that's not the case...quite the opposite...
Since California's voter population outweighs the other four states combined, there would be no need to campaign in any of them...Why push for 500,000 votes across thousands of square miles when you can push to get that in San Diego alone?...No one will go there...
Now AFTER the election, who will the winner pander to?...The people who got him in there...No representation whatsoever on the Executive level from the four states that were deemed irrelevant...California would be catered to and the rest of the country could go scratch...
Currently, populations of the top 10 states outweigh the remaining 40...If there was no Electoral College, the same scenario mentioned above would come into play...The nominees would see no reason to go to unpopulated areas when they could get more votes just by going to the states where there are large cities...
And guess who resides in most of the large cities?...That's right...The entitlement Liberals!
That's the whole thrust of your argument....A thinly veiled way to marginalize the "flyover" states and focus on the places where Liberals live...
Aryan Imperium said:Not having such a good time of it with your recent presidents are you?
Well there you go.In a "democracy" you get the "leaders" you deserve!
SKILMATIC said:Would it be ok to the moderators here if I totally could decimate this guy every time he posted? He is a aryan spic which were the ones who cause WW1 and WW2. I dont respect these individuals at all neither should we tolerate it.
Canuck said:that guy knows nothing
America isnt a democracy its a hypocracy
the ELITE run america's political parties
SKILMATIC said:Although I beleive that our gov doesnt care about anyone do you know what we are?
Listen you have to use common sense. These people only care for one thing and thats money. To attain it some people do bad things some do not so bad things. But its only common sense to conclude the only reason why they help people is becasue america right now still has the power to overthrow the gov. When they remove the right to bear arms is when america will be no more. And we are slowly coming to that.
SKILMATIC said:Would it be ok to the moderators here if I totally could decimate this guy every time he posted? He is a aryan spic which were the ones who cause WW1 and WW2. I dont respect these individuals at all neither should we tolerate it.
Pacridge said:Sorry tolerating everyone's voice is kind of a cornerstone American rights and liberty. As long as he follows the forum rules he can say whatever darn fool thing he wishes.
ban.the.electoral.college said::2razz: So, are you saying you think Katrina was an act of Bush?
I said it was an act of God, because that's how insurance companies describe a hurricane, hence they do not have to insure homes, cars, etc., affected by it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?