- Sep 28, 2005
- Reaction score
- Political Leaning
AK_Conservative said:This is where your ignorance comes into play with the Strawman approach. I did not need to repeat myself that the media is liberal. My opinion is still the same! But you took it into your own hands to say otherwise and turn my view around! Which in turn is pure ignorance!
Second of all, there is no proof bush lied. The evidence shows that there was intelligence that saddam had nuclear weapons so we acted upon it diplomatically, then it turned into war becuase saddam did not cooperate! Simple as that!
This may be the overlaying approach to this, but i believe it goes much much deeper as i expressed above! Now you can chose to turn your head and not take into consideration this is a cause, or you can sit back and be a true liberal and ignore every possible outlook on something and stick to your ignorant rhetoric like you provided in your last 3 posts!
So, your still stuck on the media bias thing?
The media's "bias" didn't make the Administration do questionable things, Like Rove for example.
They are covering things that happen, and things that they get from thier sources.
Sometimes, like in the situation of Dan Rather, they get information that is so appealing they forget to determine the credibility of thier source, and publish it. They publish it because they know thier show/segment will be watched by many and thier advertisers will be happy.
There was so much coverage of the Monica Lewinsky situation on the news I was getting sick of watching the same crap over and over, same thing with the Hurricanes (We DON'T need to see every buildings damage and a 2 minute description of it).
Thats all it is. I do not believe there is any media bias, unless it comes from individually biased shows like I explained earlier.