• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It wasn't what Kimmel said about Kirk that got him fired!

WisconIndependent

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
2,372
Reaction score
3,087
Gender
Male
Because he said nothing negative about Kirk. It was when he continued and made fun of Trump not going to the see Kirk off, but instead went and played golf. Trump's \fcc head basically came out and said anyone saying bad things about Trump in the future will lose their license to operate. This is a man who during his inaugural speech told us he was clearing the way for free speech. Guess free speech is only of you go after the "libs", but Trump is now off limits.
 
Now he says that it might be "worthwhile" to go after The View and SNL. The networks need to stand up to this crap. Can you imagine if the Biden DOJ went after Fox when they lost their lawsuit because they lied?
 
Maybe it was an excuse to 'move on'?

Are late shows really all that popular across the board these days?

I haven’t watched late night since Carson or Letterman. And neither of them would have likely touched those comments.

Used to be maybe some lighter political commentary; nothing divisive. Something everyone could laugh at.
Now everything I see mentioned about late night shows is pushing it as far as they can.

Gone political.
 
Maybe it was an excuse to 'move on'?

Are late shows really all that popular across the board these days?

I haven’t watched late night since Carson or Letterman. And neither of them would have likely touched those comments.

Used to be maybe some lighter political commentary; nothing divisive. Something everyone could laugh at.
Now everything I see mentioned about late night shows is pushing it as far as they can.

Gone political.
Political speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. Just like all those opinion shows on FoxNews/Pravda are protected. Just like Rush Limbaugh was protected. Just like the idiots on talk radio are protected.

Government pressure is unconstitutional. Late night hosts are free to engage in political speech just like anyone else. When the government steps in, might as well live in Russia.
 
Kimmel worked for a private business, they can fire him any time. Besides, even free speech has limitations.
 
Trump wrote. "That leaves Jimmy and Seth, two total losers, on Fake News NBC. Their ratings are also horrible. Do it NBC!!!"

Words fail me.
Sitting POTUS actively and openly calling for the censoring of media that hurts his feelings.
 
Kimmel worked for a private business, they can fire him any time. Besides, even free speech has limitations.
Kimmel should have seen the writing on the wall, ABC just used this as a golden opportunity'.
 
Kimmel should have seen the writing on the wall, ABC just used this as a golden opportunity'.
My God...it is amazing how quickly and eagerly some embrace the Trump narrative. I get it , because the truth stinks. Trump used his power to coerce ABC and they folded. We have the head of the FCC's own words and now he is going after the View and SNL When exactly did you abandon the Constitution?
 
My God...it is amazing how quickly and eagerly some embrace the Trump narrative. I get it , because the truth stinks. Trump used his power to coerce ABC and they folded.
Yeah, like the media has "folded" for over the last 10 years :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Not anything Kimmel ssid
Kimmel lied. So you are saying that his claim that Robinson was MAGA was not a lie? Not an attempt to flip the message on this murder? What he did was disgraceful but of course the left will defend it as free speech. Funny how the left thinks anything one of their own says, no matter how full of shit, is free speech.
 
Political speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. Just like all those opinion shows on FoxNews/Pravda are protected. Just like Rush Limbaugh was protected. Just like the idiots on talk radio are protected.

Government pressure is unconstitutional. Late night hosts are free to engage in political speech just like anyone else. When the government steps in, might as well live in Russia.

Relax, since Trump fixed that back in January. ;)

 
Kimmel lied. So you are saying that his claim that Robinson was MAGA was not a lie? Not an attempt to flip the message on this murder? What he did was disgraceful but of course the left will defend it as free speech. Funny how the left thinks anything one of their own says, no matter how full of shit, is free speech.
He never said that. It is you who are lying. Why?
 
The people on here defending and excusing Trump's dictatorial efforts to squelch free speech and punish anyone who is critical of him makes me want to puke.

You know who you are.

Pathetic humans. All of you.

Just wanted to express that while I still could.

That is all.
 
Kimmel worked for a private business, they can fire him any time. Besides, even free speech has limitations.
So a man who makes a joke about Trump can be fired, but a man who advocates for putting a bullet in the homeless keeps his?
 
Trump has the full support of a compliant Congress and a sympathetic Supreme Court.

CNBC reports, "President Donald Trump on Thursday suggested that the federal government might revoke the licenses of broadcast television networks that are “against” him.

"Trump’s comment came a day after ABC suspended airing the “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” show because of comments its host made linking the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk to Trump’s MAGA movement.

"Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr earlier on Wednesday had hinted that the broadcast license of ABC — which is a subsidiary of Disney — was at risk if it did not “take action on Kimmel.”

Speaking on Thursday to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I have read someplace that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily, all seven swing states,” referring to his 2024 election win.

“They give me only bad publicity, press. I mean, they’re getting a license,” Trump said, according to audio from a press gaggle provided by the White House.

“I would think maybe their license should be taken away,” Trump said.

No wonder Republicans are silent. Trump is killing their party with his big mouth.
 
Because he said nothing negative about Kirk. It was when he continued and made fun of Trump not going to the see Kirk off, but instead went and played golf. Trump's \fcc head basically came out and said anyone saying bad things about Trump in the future will lose their license to operate. This is a man who during his inaugural speech told us he was clearing the way for free speech. Guess free speech is only of you go after the "libs", but Trump is now off limits.

‘No dictator is inconvenienced or even displeased by cartoons showing his terrible person stalking through blood and mud…What he does not want to get around is the idea that he is an ass, which is really damaging.’
New Zealand-born cartoonist David Low
 
My God...it is amazing how quickly and eagerly some embrace the Trump narrative. I get it , because the truth stinks. Trump used his power to coerce ABC and they folded. We have the head of the FCC's own words and now he is going after the View and SNL When exactly did you abandon the Constitution?
Its as if donald is a hypnotist.
He tells them they're ducks.
They start quackin'.
 
I stand corrected. Not a bullet, but a lethal injection.

G1IWLjUW8AEXZ_K
 
Kimmel should have seen the writing on the wall, ABC just used this as a golden opportunity'.

These facts weaken the above:

FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatened ABC and its affiliates if they didn’t act in regards to Kimmel.

Carr said, “We can do this the easy way or the hard wayThese [COMPANIES] can find ways to change conduct and take action, frankly, on Kimmel or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC aheadremedies we can look at…You could certainly see a path forward for suspension over thisThis is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney.
[Emphasis mine.]

Carr also stated: “[R]eally sort of past time that a lot of these licensed broadcasters themselves push back on Comcast and Disney, and say, 'Listen, we are going to preempt, we are not going to run, Kimmel anymore until you straighten this out, because we licensed broadcaster[s] are running the possibility of fines or license revocations from the FCC if we continue to run content that ends up being a pattern of news distortion.'"

ABC, NexStar, and Sinclair have licenses issued by the FCC.

NexStar is pursuing acquisition of Tegnar, which requires the acquiescence of the FCC, specifically FCC Chair Carr’s approval is necessary for NexStar to acquire Tegnar.

There were meetings Wednesday afternoon, which included Iger and Dana Walden, executives, at times Kimmel, discussing, inter alia, how to address Kimmel’s remarks and Carr’s comments which could prompt costly litigation.

Now, it was the threat by a government actor, Carr, which in part played role to sideline Kimmel, and the 1st Amendment Free Speech Clause is applicable to government actors such as the FCC.

This wasn’t a mere business decision.

Carr’s comments were a threat to the licenses of at least all 3 entities, essentially the entities’ economic livelihood, with possible litigation that depletes the piggg bank as well, and because of Kimmel’s speech.
 
Kimmel lied. So you are saying that his claim that Robinson was MAGA was not a lie? Not an attempt to flip the message on this murder? What he did was disgraceful but of course the left will defend it as free speech. Funny how the left thinks anything one of their own says, no matter how full of shit, is free speech.

Kimmel didn’t claim Robinson was or is a adherent to MAGA.

Kimmel’s comment is describing what transpired and not stating factually or as a true proposition Robinson is or was a MAGA adherent.

Kimmel said, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

Kimmel is describing A.) what MAGA did, what action MAGA performed, and B.) that action was to distinguish or portray the murderer as not MAGA with the C.) the motive, and/or purpose and/or objective of political favorability. Nothing expicitly states or implies the murderer is or was a MAGA adherent.

Further analysis, inspired by a Jackson Pollock admirer in another thread with sentence diagramming.

/MAGA/ subject

/desperately/ adverb describing the action, a verb of: /trying/ verb (Thus far Kimmel is telling us what the subject, MAGA, DID, descriptive, describing, and the DID was “desperately trying,” desp. trying to what?

The what is: /characterize (describe Oxford English dictionary) this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them/ This is the what, MAGA did ^^^this, MAGA did try to what? characterize; characterize How?

The How, characterize how; /(describe)>as anything other than one of them/ describing how MAGA characterize/describe the murderer

Kimmel’s comment is to recount, to describe, what the subject (MAGA) did, how they did it, and then conjoined with WHY they did it, and is devoid of any assertion, whether implied, inferred, explicit, the murderer WAS an adherent of MAGA.



Kimmel neither affirmed or denied the characterization as false, true, or misleading. Kimmel is stating what MAGA did.
 
Back
Top Bottom