Have you remembered where you saw Springfield locals "testifying" Haitians were eating their pets?
Did you actually watch it or did Fox tell you about it?Trump nailed her at the start and finish.
Send her a MAGA hat
He smacked her with her Marxist ideology, and then asking why she didn’t get any of her ideas accomplished?
You are unbelievable.
But, but, he used the word "testified". Surely that counts for something?
You guys just can't help yourselves.
Wasn't much to fact check on one side.
Would you prefer the candidate who believes public schools are performing sex change surgeries on their students?
Are the dead cats in the room with us now, Zappa?
I think what they really like is the guy who would fellate Putin or Orban for a crisp twenty and an attaboy.
The moderators last night have become the new Monica Crowley. Ruined reputations. Awful is a compliment as to what happened last night.
Kamala didn’t generate any positive memorable moments. Nothing that people will recall and repeat.
She also had Al Gore disease, but worse. For example, laughing at the suffering she and Biden have brought upon the American people looked heartless and ridiculous.
Don’t believe me?
Here’s some proof the network propandists prefer you don’t learn:
Reuters interviewed 10 people who were still unsure how they were going to vote in the Nov. 5 election before they watched the debate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump or were leaning toward backing him. Three said they would now back Harris and one was still unsure how he would vote.
Some undecided voters not convinced by Harris after debate with Trump
Kamala Harris was widely seen as dominating Tuesday's presidential debate against Republican former president Donald Trump, but a group of undecided voters remained unconvinced that the Democratic vice president was the better candidate. Six said afterward they would now either vote for Trump...www.yahoo.com
NYT
Pundits Said Harris Won the Debate. Undecided Voters Weren’t So Sure.
For weeks, undecided voters have been asking for more substance. So it was perhaps no accident that Vice President Kamala Harris’ first words during the presidential debate on Tuesday were, “I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan.” Some Americans might need more convincing...www.yahoo.com
Pundits = Leftists
Why are some Trump fans so obsessed with sexual acts and people’s private parts in general?
Have you remembered where you saw Springfield locals "testifying" Haitians were eating their pets?So many Leftists pop out of their hovels, and yet none of you can rebut the attempted 3 on 1 sodomy claim.
One poster said he should expect it.
True, he should.
But it’s a great reveal by the Leftists, who knows, like anyone with a few brain cells, that the media is beyond biased.
Even the NYT admits, despite the attempted sodomy, the public has a different view and conclusion from the debate as the pundits.
It tells us: the general public doesn’t like journalistic gangbanger sodomists, and over the top one-sided bullshit fiestas.
Despite their best attempts, it was Trump who created the two most memorable smackdowns of the Lying Marxist (Lying Marxist being a redundancy).
You’re claiming Harris & Co let in a bunch of Jeffrey Dahmer types.
Really, it is funny that the only take away from this so called *ahem* debate was pet eating
We’re not.
Some Trump fans aren’t obsessed with sexual innuendo?
Just passing on what the NYT wrote.It's good to see illiberals like Zappa flailing around, trying to land blows on a target that isn't there. More please!
