• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israeli soldiers testify: Everyone passing through the Netzarim Corridor in Gaza is shot.

Most people identify war with civilian suffering....

Nobody claimed otherwise, so you are just waffling to the wind again
Not all civilian deaths in war are "murder".

Nobody claimed this either. Two out of two straw men

The ones were unarmed civilians enter into an unmarked zone the Israeli army has assigned as a killing zone, regardless of what the status of the person wandering in actually is ( a crime in and of its self imo) are murders.

I get that you don't care about the murdering of Palestinians and will do your level best to either ignore them or downplay them, or blame someone other than the actual murderer, as you have again here, but those who are able to apply standards evenly because they are not bound by bias and bigotry are right to make the distinction.

You considered such murders " extreme" actions but tellingly not crimes which is in keeping with your hopelessly biased and bigoted views on this conflict.
 
Nobody claimed otherwise, so you are just waffling to the wind again


Nobody claimed this either. Two out of two straw men

The ones were unarmed civilians enter into an unmarked zone the Israeli army has assigned as a killing zone, regardless of what the status of the person wandering in actually is ( a crime in and of its self imo) are murders.

I get that you don't care about the murdering of Palestinians and will do your level best to either ignore them or downplay them, or blame someone other than the actual murderer, as you have again here, but those who are able to apply standards evenly because they are not bound by bias and bigotry are right to make the distinction.

You considered such murders " extreme" actions but tellingly not crimes which is in keeping with your hopelessly biased and bigoted views on this conflict.

Much typing....
 
Civilized people don't openly support Islamist terror groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas or theocratic nutjobs such as the Iranian regime. You do.

Those you aided in Syria are " theocratic nutjobs " and head choppers and the West is now moving to take them of the " terrorist" list.

People who have any brain cells have long since sussed that the term terrorism is just being used as a tool of public deception. Terrorists cease being terrorists or become being terrorists dependent on who it is they are fighting.

Civilized people don't support the murder of innocent civilians, you do.
 
There is a lot of MSM media between far-left and far-right. How about we stick to it?
Because the MSM are the biggest problem when it comes to state propaganda
 
Black Knight, Act II

The record is clear, you got outed playing straw men and playing down the murders of kids. No wonder you want to hide behind a deluge of pathetic and childish posts
 
Black Knight, Act IV

There is no limit to the childishness in your postings here.

You are evidently unable to be embarrassed by them
 
Those you aided in Syria are " theocratic nutjobs " and head choppers and the West is now moving to take them of the " terrorist" list.
Israel didn't "aid them", it protected itself because Hezbollah was attacking its citizens.
 
You're not happy that Haaretz exposes Israeli atrocities to the world? Tough. Oh, and speaking of lies, shall we examine Israeli propaganda's unimpeachable record of truthfulness and moral integrity?


A Turkish professor told me that at least 90% of Turks are Salafi, (what I call Maddog Muslim). Where does that leave Turkey as a source of objective news?
 
A Turkish professor told me that at least 90% of Turks are Salafi, (what I call Maddog Muslim). Where does that leave Turkey as a source of objective news?
90% of Turks identify as Sunni of which Salafism is a component, and which is practised by the majority of Muslims around the world. Are they all your "Maddog Muslims"?

 
Israel didn't "aid them", it protected itself because Hezbollah was attacking its citizens.


Pathetic nonsense aimed at hiding the fact that Israel did indeed aid the likes of HTS in Syria

The irony being that Haaretz was the first news outlet to reference the evidence gathered by the UN observers on the Golan border

Reports presented to the United Nations Security Council reveal numerous interactions between Israeli troops and rebel groups on the Israel-Syrian border over the past year and a half.


UN observers in the Golan Heights meticulously detailed instances of contact between IDF soldiers and rebels, including Syrians being sent into Israel for medical treatment, and the transfer of items and containers, according to records maintained by the UN disengagement force in the Golan demilitarized zone.


The reports were first detailed by Israeli daily Haaretz on Sunday.


............................

The reports use “armed members of the opposition” as a blanket term to describe rebel and jihadi groups operating against the Syrian government.




Your constant lies about what Israel gets up to are truly pathetic
 
According to the people who believe that the Earth is flat, yeah.


Haaretz was the first Israeli news outlet to reveal that Israel was aiding jihadists in Syria who were fighting govt forces.
 
After a shooting, the bodies are left to attracting flocks of dogs that feed on them. It concerns a seven-kilometer-long line that divides Gaza in two, just south of Gaza City. According to CNN, Israel has built a road there "to facilitate raids." Although the line does not appear on maps or in official orders, it is referred to as the "line of dead bodies," according to a commander.





Have you noticed Juks how all the usual suspects here have tried to stay away from the actual story line as much as they can.

I put this same report up a couple of days prior to yours appearing and it's the same/similar story in that thread too.

The disregard for Palestinian life and the hypocrisy over war criminality from so many in this forum is truly vile, don't you think?
 
Seems like 'entering' would be more appropriate than 'passing through'.

Dead bodies might indicate possible risk.

Word travels quickly. Civilians who are smart avoid war zones.

Children should be kept with their parents or relatives who aren't involved in the war, unless they're being used for cover.

Or just post signs, "Those who enter will be shot."

Reading back through your ignorant and sickening blame shifting from the perpetrators onto the actual victims of war crimes it's hard to come to any other conclusion that you don't actually oppose war criminality or the illegal slaughter of civilians, including kids.

Your posts read like they came from the curriculum of the Ted Bundy School of Ethical Studies, doesn't that bother you?
 
Reading back through your ignorant and sickening blame shifting from the perpetrators onto the actual victims of war crimes it's hard to come to any other conclusion that you don't actually oppose war criminality or the illegal slaughter of civilians, including kids.

Your posts read like they came from the curriculum of the Ted Bundy School of Ethical Studies, doesn't that bother you?

Name calling and insults....
 
Back
Top Bottom