John.NoseTip
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2012
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 100
- Location
- Music City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I'm sure it's too much to ask that our government let Israel fight it's own war. Sooner or later the rest of the world is going to start kicking back against all this aggression and our leaders must know this. Therefore, I have to assume that there are people who want a large scale conflict in the world. Aren't constant wars one of the signatures of a society in decline?
Bloomberg
Meanwhile, the Nobel Committee can award Romney or Obama another Peace Prize.No one is hitting iran until after the election
As we all know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Possible war with Iran could be month-long affair: Israel minister | Top News | Reuters
I'm sure it's too much to ask that our government let Israel fight it's own war. Sooner or later the rest of the world is going to start kicking back against all this aggression and our leaders must know this. Therefore, I have to assume that there are people who want a large scale conflict in the world. Aren't constant wars one of the signatures of a society in decline?
Bloomberg
Meanwhile, the Nobel Committee can award Romney or Obama another Peace Prize.
I think it's just a signature of society.
I'm sure it's too much to ask that our government let Israel fight it's own war. Sooner or later the rest of the world is going to start kicking back against all this aggression and our leaders must know this. Therefore, I have to assume that there are people who want a large scale conflict in the world. Aren't constant wars one of the signatures of a society in decline?
Bloomberg
right. meanwhile, Russia and China just back right off and let Iran be conquered in a month. what a fairy tale.
Hmm? Did we read the same article? I don't think there was any mention of troops crossing Iranian borders at any stage of that article. I also don't think it's realistic to think that Russia or China would militarily intercede in a conflict between a nuclear power and a foe who is inimical to major energy producing countries in the Gulf. China might try and preclude military intervention for a number of reasons. But there is no way they are going to extend their neck out for them when the missiles start to fly. The same can be said for Syria.
i respectfully and strongly disagree that Russia and China will sit on the sidelines if a preemptive strike is launched on Iran.
What will they do? In this scenario when a flurry of Jericho-III Missiles and Popeye Turbo II cruise missiles hit Iranian early warning, air defense, and command and control sites, what will Russia and China's tangible response be? I think its ludicrous to think it will involve a military intervention.
What will they do? In this scenario when a flurry of Jericho-III Missiles and Popeye Turbo II cruise missiles hit Iranian early warning, air defense, and command and control sites, what will Russia and China's tangible response be? I think its ludicrous to think it will involve a military intervention.
how about the begin arming iran to the teeth
share nuclear weapons making secrets and materiel
build alliances with those who oppose the israel-USA - house of saud triple threat
and china could refuse to lend us any more money
both countries have already warned against iranian invasion
besides, what is the legitimate basis to justify an attack against iran
besides that we did not actually require one to invade iraq
i think it's ludicrous to argue that the Iranian nuclear program will be ended solely by a series of surgical conventional missile strikes. Russia and China have a plethora of (proxy and other) military and economic options at their disposal to respond to such a preemptive strike. and if the surgical missile strike is nuclear, the entire world community will respond to some degree.
this has certainly been a bonanza for the oil industry
israel keeps threatening iran, pushing oil prices higher
further reducing the rate of economic recovery
which can only hurt Obama's re-election prospects
the actual israeli government intent
i think it's ludicrous to argue that the Iranian nuclear program will be ended solely by a series of surgical conventional missile strikes. Russia and China have a plethora of (proxy and other) military and economic options at their disposal to respond to such a preemptive strike. and if the surgical missile strike is nuclear, the entire world community will respond to some degree.
...................
share nuclear weapons making secrets and materiel
build alliances with those who oppose the israel-USA ..........
That has already happened! ....China, Russia and you can add North Korea helping Iran to the mix as well
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?