• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Israel Is Committing Genocide in Gaza, U.N. Inquiry Says

TangoNoCash

Radical Far Left Socialist Communist
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2023
Messages
8,924
Reaction score
14,155
Location
US
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
A United Nations commission investigating the war in Gaza said Tuesday that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians, the panel’s most sweeping findings yet about the Israeli government’s conduct in the conflict.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza,” the panel’s leader, Navi Pillay, a South African high court judge and former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in a statement.


Hopefully this can bring about change and stop the killing.
 
A United Nations commission investigating the war in Gaza said Tuesday that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians, the panel’s most sweeping findings yet about the Israeli government’s conduct in the conflict.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza,” the panel’s leader, Navi Pillay, a South African high court judge and former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in a statement.


Hopefully this can bring about change and stop the killing.
*Hopefully' Israel will continue to kill Hamas terrorists.
 
Do you believe this justifies genocide, ethnic cleansing, mass destruction, etc assuming we interpret "from the river to the sea" as a call for the destruction of Israel and genocide of its people?

Nope, but “from the river to the sea” appears to be contest (battle?) between Arabs and Jews to claim (all or more of) that territory.
 
From the river to the sea… ;)
The cutesy wink seems inappropriate.

Both Palestine and Israel have their own little genocidal chants.

It’d be interesting if they could back off of one another and coexist without violence for a time. That’d be great. Easier said than done, especially for someone as uninvolved in their fighting as me.
 
As I said in the other thread on this, no one should be surprised this was the conclusion. Israel under Netanyahu has been on a revenge slaughter of everyone left alive in Gaza with the full intention of taking it all for Israel and resettlement.
 
Sure. we already know that you prefer a terrorist organisation to a democracy.
You are entitled to make whatever stupid assumptions you like. Care you comment on the UN inquiry declaration that Israel is committing a genocide?
 
A United Nations commission investigating the war in Gaza said Tuesday that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians, the panel’s most sweeping findings yet about the Israeli government’s conduct in the conflict.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza,” the panel’s leader, Navi Pillay, a South African high court judge and former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in a statement.


Hopefully this can bring about change and stop the killing.

It would be so much better, and faster, if Hamas just surrendered... or better, if they never conducted their terrorist attack in the first place.



.
 
It would be so much better, and faster, if Hamas just surrendered... or better, if they never conducted their terrorist attack in the first place.



.
That would be placing oct 7th in a vacuum.
 
Why settle for just a barren piece of desert land when your ultimate goal is the total destruction of Israel? Ignore the fact that you have no ability to self govern let alone become economically viable and your love affair with terrorist organizations taints your ability to find support among other middle east counties. Matter of fact, the only thing you can do is drum up support among bleeding heart leftist who happen to have a well meaning but counter productive knee-jerk compulsion to help the underdog.
 
Last edited:
Nope, but “from the river to the sea” appears to be contest (battle?) between Arabs and Jews to claim (all or more of) that territory.
That is how a lot of people interpret that slogan I believe. I ask because I think a lot of people who defend Israel's actions aren't defending them because they're denying war crimes, mass slaughter, mass destruction, calls for ethnic cleansing, etc are actually taking place, but that these actions, while regrettable, are justified given the situation. Their argument is that they had no choice because Hamas forced their hand. My question to anyone arguing this: in what circumstances are war crimes (as defined by international law), ethnic cleansing, etc justified? Are there any specific actions taken by Israel that are considered war crimes under internation law that should not be? How should international law be changed to account for these circumstances?
 
That would be placing oct 7th in a vacuum.
Nope. We are talking about the easiest and fastest way to save people's lives... that is surrendering, immediately.
 
A United Nations commission investigating the war in Gaza said Tuesday that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians, the panel’s most sweeping findings yet about the Israeli government’s conduct in the conflict.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza,” the panel’s leader, Navi Pillay, a South African high court judge and former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, said in a statement.


Hopefully this can bring about change and stop the killing.
The UN is filled with terrorists, some who even helped on Oct 7th.
 
Nope. We are talking about the easiest and fastest way to save people's lives... that is surrendering, immediately.
That solution depends on Hamas surrendering and Israel honoring any peace agreements and halting their offense. I view those things as pretty unlikely, so even if it's the easiest and fastest solution, I don't view it as a good excuse not to pursue alternative, more practical solutions as well.
 
That is how a lot of people interpret that slogan I believe. I ask because I think a lot of people who defend Israel's actions aren't defending them because they're denying war crimes, mass slaughter, mass destruction, calls for ethnic cleansing, etc are actually taking place, but that these actions, while regrettable, are justified given the situation. Their argument is that they had no choice because Hamas forced their hand. My question to anyone arguing this: in what circumstances are war crimes (as defined by international law), ethnic cleansing, etc justified? Are there any specific actions taken by Israel that are considered war crimes under internation law that should not be? How should international law be changed to account for these circumstances?

I suppose that depends on who makes international law and who has the power to enforce it. Was the US use of nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki a war crime or against international law?
 
That solution depends on Hamas surrendering and Israel honoring any peace agreements and halting their offense. I view those things as pretty unlikely, so even if it's the easiest and fastest solution, I don't view it as a good excuse not to pursue alternative, more practical solutions as well.

Fair enough...
 
Back
Top Bottom