- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Based off?Then these 'studies' are wrong as well.
Based off?Then these 'studies' are wrong as well.
Based on all the available evidence and the facts before us.Based off?
Based on all the available evidence and the facts before us.
It's not my job to educate you as to the facts. That's your responsibility.And they are......???
It's not my job to educate you as to the facts. That's your responsibility.
If you seriously believe the USA is responsible for the ongoing problems in the middle east then you, like many leftists, are simply unteachable.
ISIS militants reportedly burn to death 45 people in western Iraqi town | Fox News
These people seem to be daring us, BEGGING us to send in ground forces. Acts this brazen undoubtedly are meant to elicit a response...
Actually after reading all you put up in here it shows EXACTLY how much you don't know and why you always use those BS and weakass left talking Points. Just to utter some comments to those Conservatives. Thinking you actually knew something.
You don't and didn't.
Now what Part about 3 different Terrorist Organizations declaring War on us and our People.....confuses that grey matter sitting on those shoulders. Yeah thats what I thought. You got nothing.....your usual. What happened, your hackin just can't make the grade.
Oh looky what I just tripped across. You playing the high horse card again. It's not just a theme... its a meme with you. :lol:
The Crusades had nothing to do with religion either!
Again it is power that is the root core. The struggle between Shia and Sunni.. power. Power over people and land.
Absolutely. We'd do better busting our asses trying to make that land over there worthless so they could go back to fighting each other with sticks, stones and sand.
So... No answer... :thumbs:
As I've stated over and over again. This consequences of the US involvement in the middle east and the consequences of the destabilization of the region is bigger than one man. It goes all the way back to the 80's possibly further. Several presidents and their policies are responsible for this mass insurgency and destablization of the region.
But not the soviets at all, right?
Last I checked the Soviets were not supporting radical jihadists.
Move goal posts much?
You brought up the evil US's involvement in the mid east since the 80's. I pointed out the soviets also meddled a bit themselves/
Yea... With secular governments. Last time I checked the big worry in the middle east is radical islamists...
Meddling is meddling, the communists don't get a pass cause you like em.
The difference is our meddling was direct support for the jihadis. Their meddling was in opposition to jihaids.
Where do you find the contradiction?Funny that while Mr. Grant blames the Obama administration for the mess in the Middle East, he calls people blaming the US lefties. Oh the irony!!
Where do you find the contradiction?
And it's an understandable response. Why let a few despots control the world's oil supply while their people suffer?Sticks and stones may break their bones, but....
Exactly. If it weren't for their oil, our response would be the same as it is in Somalia.
Are you referring to my criticisms of the buffoon in the White House?With you blaming America, while criticizing lefties for blaming America.
Are you referring to my criticisms of the buffoon in the White House?